* Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-21 14:29]:
> Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am forwarding below a bug report filed against the octave2.9-emacsen
> > package. The submitter claims that the meta-backspace should not be
> > b
I am forwarding below a bug report filed against the octave2.9-emacsen
package. The submitter claims that the meta-backspace should not be
bound by octave-mode.
I would like to hear from you whether backward-kill-word is really the
standard keybinding for meta-backspace and whether it should be
* Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-19 11:04]:
> On 19 October 2005 at 10:47, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> | Niels is completely right in my view (Sorry Dirk). Nobody would be
> | adding personal preferences to mode hooks in these files.
>
> I have no particular attachment to this
[N.B. 1: Niels, Dirk, and other members of the DOG: I am moving this
discussion to debian-emacs. I cannot really make my mind on this issue
and I hope that broadening the discussion will help us to find a
consensus.]
[N.B. 2: Please, keep Cc: to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear debian-emacsen lurkers,
I
* Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-10-26 14:14]:
> On the other hand, maybe policy changes should be filed as bugs
> against emacsen-common?
Thanks for your suggestion, it is done for the present case. See
Bug#117359.
--
Rafael
te packages.
+
7) Mandatory binary symlink
Each emacsen main package must have a symlink
--
Rafael Laboissiere
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:17:05AM -0600, Rob Browning wrote:
> Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > dpkg-dev-emacsen and dpkg-dev-el have been suggested too, I guess so
> > that Xemacs/EINE/ZWEI or other Emacs variants users are not
> > jealous. I have no strong opinion for or against
an-emacsen a couple of days
ago (Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>). I though that we
all agreed that this file should go into a separate package, already put
together by Roland.
At any rate, I am going to sponsor Roland and upload the package to
Incoming, unless it is decided that it should go into emacsen.
--
Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sion number equal to "1". You should ask
the upstream maintainers (Peter Galbraith, I guess) about their
preference.
> PS: CC'd to my AM (I'm at the tasks & skills step in the NM process :-).
If nobody else step up, I will sponsor this package and make it into woody.
--
Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
s are not expected to do Debian package development. This would
be a real bloat.
In our archive, there are already a couple of small packages containing only
emacsen add-ons, like prcs-el and octave2.0-emacsen.
At any rate, thanks for your work on debian-changelog-mode.el!
--
Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 03:09:45PM -0400, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> To summarize:
>
> 1) Require that emacs init scripts which happen to be conffiles behave
>nicely upon package removal, as already required for init.d scripts
>by 3.3.2 of the policy manual.
This is what I will do r
debian-policy.
[BTW, I like your "callout" proposal.]
Thanks,
--
Rafael Laboissiere
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 05:17:36PM -0400, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > > Specifically, because
I am following up this bug report to the debian-emacsen mailing list,
because this is a issue that can raised for other emacsen add-on packages.
The Debian Emacs Policy document says nothing about making
/etc/emacs/site-start.d/* conffiles or not.
What should be done?
--
Rafael Laboissiere
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 07:43:07AM +, W. Borgert wrote:
> I didn't found anything in the Debian policy, nor in the
> Debian emacs policy, and nothing in the Debian emacsen
> mailing list, so: Is there anything I can do about file
> extensions, that Emacs already treats as something else?
> In
thread
started with Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
--
Rafael Laboissiere
--- Start of forwarded message ---
From: Per Abrahamsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,gnu.emacs.gnus
Subject: Free software: Packagers vs Developers
Followup-To: gnu.misc.discuss
Date:
15 matches
Mail list logo
