Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Nice! dictionary-el looks to be more feature rich than dict.el.
>
> I should remember to pass all this praise upstream. ;-)
Absolutely!
> > I suppose I should leave dict.el in the package anyway. T
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nice! dictionary-el looks to be more feature rich than dict.el.
I should remember to pass all this praise upstream. ;-)
> I suppose I should leave dict.el in the package anyway. They don't
> conflict. It needs to be checkdoc cleaned though.
Righ
2 matches
Mail list logo
