Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-27 Thread Jeff Carr
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 00:31, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If we use the "preferred form of the work for making modifications to > it" definition of source code, what is the form that best meets that > definition? > > What form of the work do the copyright holders use to make changes t

Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations

2008-10-27 Thread Jeff Carr
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 18:41, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Whoever the copyright holder of that work is (I read your remark above > to mean that the hardware manufacturer is that copyright holder), > there must be a "preferred form of the work for making modifications > to it". What fo

Bug#442394: ITP: virtualenv -- Python virtual environment creator

2007-09-15 Thread Jeff Licquia
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jeff Licquia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: virtualenv Version : 0.8.1 Upstream Author : Ian Bicking * URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/virtualenv/ * License : MIT-style Programming Lang: Python Descr

Bug#444022: ITP: papi -- OpenPrinting PAPI suite

2007-09-25 Thread Jeff Licquia
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jeff Licquia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: papi Version : 1.0 beta Upstream Author : Norm Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/openprinting * License : Mostly CDDL (some LG

Re: Bug#444022: ITP: papi -- OpenPrinting PAPI suite

2007-09-25 Thread Jeff Licquia
Vincent Danjean wrote: For me, papi is a library with its tools to access hardware performance counters. It used a lot on some plateform (NUMA, ...) to analyze the performance of HPC programs. Google with "papi" give this link in first : http://icl.cs.utk.edu/papi/ This software is not packaged

Re: ITP: cddb.bundle -- CDDB Bundle for GNUstep

2004-10-04 Thread Jeff Teunissen
Frank Küster wrote: > Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > > On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 05:27:59PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > >> Seo Sanghyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > >> > For example, "camera" package name was changed to "camera.app" to > >> > prevent namespace pollution. Are you

Bug#274957: ITP: susv3 -- Fetch and install SUSv3 documentation

2004-10-04 Thread Jeff Bailey
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: susv3 Upstream Author : Copyright (c) 2001-2003 IEEE and The Open Group * License : Installer Package: Public Domain Description : Fetch and install SUSv3 documentation This package was created at the request of Andrew Josey fro

Bug#274956: ITP: susv2 -- Fetch and install SUSv2 documentation

2004-10-04 Thread Jeff Bailey
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: susv2 Upstream Author : Copyright (c) 2001-2003 IEEE and The Open Group * License : Installer Package: Public Domain Description : Fetch and install SUSv2 documentation This package was created at the request of Andrew Josey fro

Re: ITP: cddb.bundle -- CDDB Bundle for GNUstep

2004-10-05 Thread Jeff Teunissen
Frank Küster wrote: > Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Frank Küster wrote: > > > >> If I'm wrong, I apologize and will not object against cddb.bundle (at > >> least not because of this. Still the ".bundle" part is meanin

Re: Re: ITP: cddb.bundle -- CDDB Bundle for GNUstep

2004-10-06 Thread Jeff Teunissen
Miles Bader wrote: > Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > For me, I don't want GNUstep in the names of my programs because I am > > not connected to GNUstep and don't want to be. It is just a couple of > > libraries that I use to write my apps -- yo

Re: Re: Re: ITP: cddb.bundle -- CDDB Bundle for GNUstep

2004-10-07 Thread Jeff Teunissen
(Note: I'm not subscribed to -devel, only -private and d-d-a, so please Cc me on replies -- this text is copied from the web archives, which is the reason the references are gone) Steve Greenland wrote: > On 06-Oct-04, 06:41 (CDT), Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: ITP: cddb.bundle -- CDDB Bundle for GNUstep

2004-10-07 Thread Jeff Teunissen
Petri Latvala wrote: [fixing attributions] > On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 09:20, Jeff Teunissen wrote: > > [Steve Greenland wrote:] > > > On 06-Oct-04, 06:41 (CDT), Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > And developers writing with GNUstep recognize the s

Re: Terminal - a good terminal?

2004-10-07 Thread Jeff Teunissen
Eduard Bloch wrote: > > #include > * Jeff Teunissen [Thu, Oct 07 2004, 02:20:31AM]: > > > > If we are going to allow generic names, then obviously they would be > > > applied to the most commonly used or "best for the novice" example, > > > so

Re: ITP: cddb.bundle -- CDDB Bundle for GNUstep

2004-10-08 Thread Jeff Teunissen
Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Jeff Teunissen [Thu, 07 Oct 2004 03:52:37 -0400]: > > > What DOES bug me is mindlessly adding "gnustep-" to the names of all > > packages that use it, because most of the developers of those packages > > have dick to do with some myth

Re: Terminal - a good terminal?

2004-10-08 Thread Jeff Teunissen
Eduard Bloch wrote: > * Jeff Teunissen [Thu, Oct 07 2004, 09:10:56AM]: [snip] > > > Who said that the "linux" console is a good kind of terminal > > > emulation? > > > > It's what's expected. > > By whom? By people who spend a lot of

Re: Re: Terminal - a good terminal?

2004-10-09 Thread Jeff Teunissen
[ I'm not subbed to -devel, this was pulled from the archive -- please Cc me on replies ] Thomas Dickey wrote: > Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Primitive? heh. And as for the rest, I haven't had trouble -- it's > > just an infocmp away.

Re: Re: Terminal - a good terminal?

2004-10-11 Thread Jeff Teunissen
[ I'm not subbed to -devel, this was pulled from the archive -- please Cc me on replies ] Thomas Dickey wrote: > Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Primitive? heh. And as for the rest, I haven't had trouble -- it's > > just an infocmp away.

Re: Re: Terminal - a good terminal?

2004-10-12 Thread Jeff Teunissen
[ I'm not subbed to -devel, this was pulled from the archive -- please Cc me on replies ] Thomas Dickey wrote: > Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Primitive? heh. And as for the rest, I haven't had trouble -- it's > > just an infocmp away.

Bug#277426: ITP: flumotion -- Fluendo Streaming Server for audio and video

2004-10-19 Thread Jeff Waugh
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: flumotion Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : Johan Dahlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.fluendo.com/ * License : GPL Description : Fluendo Streaming Server for audio and video Flumotion is a modern

Re: Bug#152778: DBS feature request vs dpkg-source v2

2002-08-22 Thread Jeff Bailey
ut I've been intending to move to it as soon as it's even minimally ready. If you have the feeling that it will take longer than 6 months to hit unstable, then you should maybe nudge me to write a patch for you. =) Tks, Jeff Bailey -- I reincarnated for this?

orbit/evolution/linux2.5 bug #168188

2002-11-26 Thread Jeff Carr
ead of apt-src perhaps? (As I noticed that it creates it's own entry in /etc/apt/sources) Jeff

Re: US Turkey Day!

2002-11-28 Thread Jeff Waugh
> I just wanted to wish all those who celebrate Thanks Giving today and wish > everyone a happy and safe day. Eat lots of turkey...drink lots of > beer...and watch football! And, for the Americans in the crowd: http://gnome.org/ - Jeff -- "PHP, when it first came out, didn

Re: i386 compatibility & libstdc++

2003-04-25 Thread Jeff Bailey
it likely ever run on i386. We're i486 (with a co-processor) and above. Tks, Jeff Bailey -- You said homosexuals form a small percentage of the population. So do Jews. Is that a reason to deny someone equality? - Richard Marceau

feedback on jablicator: package choice sharing tool

2001-09-03 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
d package collections want to share the fruits of their labor by posting their jablicator output? Thanks, Jeff [1] It's in incoming http://incoming.debian.org or maybe already in sid by the time you read this. If you try it out, make sure to get version 1.0-3 or later.

Re: Sparc buildd a cross-compiler?

2001-12-25 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 01:49:12PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > Of course it is broken. It is _not_ supported on sparc, other than to > make it available to users. _I_ do not want anything built on sparc that > doesn't use the default compiler (except in cases such as libc6-sparc64 > where we obviou

Re: Bug#126567: libreadline4 no longer respects directory separators in tab-completion

2001-12-27 Thread Jeff Lightfoot
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001 19:31:19 +0100 Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [CC to d-devel so that people stop reporting bugs agains bash, zsh, > libreadline... although I'll keep scanning debian-bugs]. > > Bill Gribble dijo: > > On Thu, 2001-12-27 at 12:20, Amaya wrote: > > > I am experiencing this

Re: quake I for woody

2001-12-31 Thread Jeff Teunissen
Joey Hess wrote: > > Jeff, unless I'm mistaken you've taken over maintainence of the debian > packaging of quakeforge and you have fairly current packaging in the > quakeforge-current tree in their cvs. I remember that when knghtbrd > decided to remove quakeforge pac

Re: quake I for woody

2001-12-31 Thread Jeff Teunissen
Joseph Carter wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 07:02:43AM -0500, Jeff Teunissen wrote: > > > Jeff, unless I'm mistaken you've taken over maintainence of the > > > debian packaging of quakeforge and you have fairly current packaging > > > in the quake

Bug#141070: ITP: aptconf -- debconf infrastructure for setting up apt sources

2002-04-03 Thread Jeff Licquia
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Aptconf will allow users to configure sources.list via debconf. It will also contain a configlet for setting up sources.list via the GNOME Control Center, in druids, and potentially other settings. The architecture will treat the existing sources.list as the cano

Re: Bug#141070: ITP: aptconf -- debconf infrastructure for setting up apt sources

2002-04-03 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 13:38, Rob Bradford wrote: > Ooh nice, maybe you could integrate with apt-spy or something to find > the fastest for the user? I don't see why not, though I'd be more inclined to add pin support first. I had a crazy idea of doing directed graphs for country support, so you c

Re: Rsyncable GZIP (was Re: Package metadata server)

2002-04-06 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 03:13, Otto Wyss wrote: > Please show use any figures first before you assert this. > > I know rsync imposes some load for the computing of the md5sum but > sendind only the difference outweighs it repeatedly. It's my understanding that rsync imposes a large computational b

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free software in main)

2002-04-07 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 19:28, Joseph Carter wrote: > On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:04:12PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > > The GNU FDL violates the DFSG ? > > > > > > In case this is true, nearly all KDE packages have to be moved to > > > non-free as they use the GNU FDL for the documentation. For

Re: Rsyncable GZIP (was Re: Package metadata server)

2002-04-07 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 13:16, Otto Wyss wrote: > > A large mirror in Australia does provide an rsync server to access debian > > packages. When redhat 7.0 came out so many people tried to rsync it at the > > same time, the machine promptly fell over. > > > What amazes me is that nobody is able or

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free software in main)

2002-04-07 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 22:08, David Starner wrote: > On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:26:48PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > > So the FDL is a free license because it's inconvenient for it to be not? > > > > No, they're saying that a vast majority of programs which are widely > > considered free by our

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free software in main)

2002-04-07 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 22:40, Joseph Carter wrote: > > This should have been dealt with sooner. But the past three times the FDL > has been discussed on this list, no concensus was reached. The only thing > we can be certain of is that there are enough problems with it to prevent > any consensus.

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free software in main)

2002-04-07 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 22:49, Joseph Carter wrote: > On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:20:28PM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > > > > So, we change either the status quo, or the DFSG, or issue > > clarifications on why the status quo (with GFDL-licensed components) > > doesn

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free software in main)

2002-04-08 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 23:54, David Starner wrote: > On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:20:28PM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > > Also consider that pulling gcc from main would fracture the project; it > > would become literally impossible to build a completely free OS, given > > that

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free software in main)

2002-04-08 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 00:05, David Starner wrote: > On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:54:40PM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > > I don't know. Call me an optimist, but I seem to be hearing a rough > > consensus. > > Where? Branden seems to believe that anything that Debian packa

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free software in main)

2002-04-08 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 00:43, David Starner wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:27:40AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > DFSG stand for "Debian Free Software Guidelines". > > Yes, and since Debian is 100% Free Software, that applies to everything > in Debian. Documentation isn't software. Neithe

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free software in main)

2002-04-08 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 01:42, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:27:40AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > DFSG stand for "Debian Free Software Guidelines". IMHO we ave to create a > > DFDG, "Debian Free Documentation Guidelines". > > Why? What freedoms are important for software th

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free software in main)

2002-04-08 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 09:01, Richard Braakman wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 12:08:05AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > > The point is that pulling everything out that's GFDL isn't really a good > > option; it damages the project for zero gain. This is especially true

Re: GNU FDL

2002-04-08 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 11:51, David Starner wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:53:54AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > > Documentation isn't software. Neither are conffiles, icons, etc. > > When I buy software, all of that is part of what I buy. Foldoc says > that one de

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free software in main)

2002-04-08 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 12:25, Branden Robinson wrote: > Jeff, you might want to read: Noted. > People who want to opine about licensing issues really, really should > subscribe to -legal. And I have (though only recently). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free software in main)

2002-04-08 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 12:32, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 12:22:00AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > > In that thread in debian-legal, he seemed to accept the possibility that > > some things packaged for Debian might not be software. His problem > > see

Re: O: gnu-standards -- GNU coding standards

2002-04-09 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 20:53, Branden Robinson wrote: > Why should the DFSG have to worry about such philosophical questions? > Why isn't it enough to worry about the license? Because software isn't documentation? Think of it this way: national security would be so much easier to maintain if we co

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free software in main)

2002-04-09 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 19:03, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: > >I wrote this up last night after getting fed up with this thread, then > >modified it this morning after reading the thread on -legal that was > >referred to. Flame away. > > > >http://peo

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free software in main)

2002-04-09 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 15:21, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:01:15AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > > > Why? What freedoms are important for software that aren't for > > > documentation? > > > > Revisionist history, for one. I'm s

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free software in main)

2002-04-09 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 00:55, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:01:15AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > > On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 01:42, Glenn Maynard wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:27:40AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > > DFSG stand for &q

Re: O: gnu-standards -- GNU coding standards

2002-04-09 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 01:08, Anthony Towns wrote: > Replies to -legal if you must make them. This list is for development > issues, not boring license pedantry. > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 12:12:41AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > > On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 20:53, Branden Robinso

Re: O: gnu-standards -- GNU coding standards

2002-04-09 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 08:45, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 12:12:41AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > > Similarly, it would be a lot easier to just define documentation to be > > software "for the purposes of the DFSG". But does it make sense? >

Re: O: gnu-standards -- GNU coding standards

2002-04-09 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 10:27, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:08:18AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > > I think there's a consensus that the DFSG and Social Contract are poorly > > phrased; [...] > > Uh, no, there's not. That you don't understa

Re: Python module for debconf

2002-04-09 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 14:00, Gerhard Muntingh wrote: > whaah! No compiled debconfscripts on my machine. While it > would be nice to have python bindings, I'd really like to > hack all sorts of scripts when I need to. Byte-compiling Python modules isn't the same as compiling C code; it's an optimi

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free software in main)

2002-04-10 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 14:39, Steve Langasek wrote: > > I'd be happy to hear clarifications from the author and contemporaries, > then; to be honest, my memory of Debian history isn't good enough to > even know who to approach. (The debian-doc package is conspicuously > lacking of the relevant c

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free software in main)

2002-04-11 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 12:43, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > Witness the response to Jeroen. I don't think we can draw any conclusion from the response to Jeroen other than "a lot of us think rudeness is a bad thing". (Including even Jeroen himself, per his apology a few flames back in that thread.) -

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-15 Thread Jeff Licquia
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 21:14, Lasse Karkkainen wrote: > Hi! (it's my first post here) > > You are probably sick and tired of this topic, but ... > IT'S A QUARTER YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF 4.2.0 RELEASE! > > Yes, it really has been three (3) months (!) since it was released. > > Time to throw some gas

Bug#522135: ITP: python-pip -- Alternative Python package installer

2009-03-31 Thread Jeff Licquia
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jeff Licquia * Package name: python-pip Version : 0.3.1 Upstream Author : Ian Bicking * URL : http://pip.openplans.org/ * License : MIT/X Programming Lang: Python Description : Alternative Python package

Re: tg3 firmware - was (Fw: [CASE#221365]: Closed - need firmware files)

2009-04-10 Thread Jeff Carr
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 01:14, Neil Williams wrote: >> * Firmware is: >> * Derived from proprietary unpublished source code, > electrical equipment or hardware tools, not text editors. As such, not > all firmware can be expected to have any source code. In this case, as > we have a decla

Re: Let's shrink Packages.xz

2014-07-14 Thread Jeff Epler
ctually used by current versions of apt. (ideally you'd just go sha256, but iirc it's the md5sum that is used in practice, even today. but please find that thread, don't trust my summary) Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject o

Re: Solutions for the Apache upgrade hell

2014-07-14 Thread Jeff Epler
a way to say this in aptitude to directly say what you want. Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140714172947.gb6...@unpythonic.net

Re: btrfs

2014-07-20 Thread Jeff Epler
Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140720134746.gb87...@unpythonic.net

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-08-11 Thread Jeff Epler
, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_Broadcast_Broadband_TV#Security_Concerns for just one problem that arises when you assume that an adversary is willing to aim a low-power broadcast at your antenna. Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "uns

Re: Bug#632240: pylucene status

2012-04-20 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
ll depends on Python 2.5 so can't be > installed at all. Bugreport about this was filled almost a year ago > (#632240). > > Looks like the latest information from Jeff (current maintainer) was in > 2010 (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518623#10): > > >

Re: Bug#632240: pylucene status

2012-05-13 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Dmitry, Pylucene is an incredibly useful package. The very best thing is for me to no longer be involved as a maintainer for pylucene. But in the short term, if you want or need me to sponsor an upload, I can do so as early as tomorrow. Let me know.

Re: systemd .service file conversion

2013-05-31 Thread Jeff Epler
more equal^Wreal than others. Jeff signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: systemd .service file conversion

2013-05-31 Thread Jeff Epler
db) others have recently filled in another missing piece with jdk7 support and I generally get the sense that there is a core of smart people who are dedicated to kfreebsd. The idea that somehow users of non-linux kernels don't matter or don't even exist as debian users is one of the most

Re: Biological data being used by an unpublished research paper is considered proprietary

2013-09-16 Thread Jeff Epler
-crime-law-part-1-no-prison-time-for-violating-terms-of-service Based on the scenario you describe, and if the communication passed through a system under US jurisdiction, you might be in violation of this stupid law. Jeff signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: think twice before enabling -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 for C projects without thorough build-time testing

2013-09-22 Thread Jeff Epler
of *not* defining this sn?printf extension and fixing packages where we encounter use of this idiom. Jeff signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: objcopy vs absolute addresses

2013-03-29 Thread Jeff Epler
ld-id=none ... Jeff signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Need advice on building a package

2014-02-12 Thread Jeff Epler
dependencies that were just built in the previous step(s) Initially setting up dput with mini-dinstall is documented, though I didn't take the time to google up a tutorial for you. Best of luck. Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "u

Re: Bug#727708: Fsck SystemD and its developers and its users. GR to override this please.

2014-02-13 Thread Jeff Epler
For software that is incompatible with pulseaudio, prefix the command with 'pasuspender': $ pasuspender oss-or-alsa-only-program args... Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list

Re: [lsb-discuss] Does anyone care about LSB on arm?

2011-06-01 Thread Jeff Licquia
On 06/01/2011 07:25 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: so in _that_ regard, the question becomes: "are the efforts of the free software community better off being spent elsewhere"? and "what benefit is there *TO THE FREE SOFTWARE COMMUNITY* of doing LSB for ARM"? forget the proprietary j

Re: init script cannot stop pid process

2015-02-11 Thread Jeff Epler
g to the specified --uid/--gid? Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150212022643.ga62...@unpythonic.net

Re: Should .a library contains non-reallocatable code?

2015-02-19 Thread Jeff Epler
y was written. Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150219231930.gb37...@unpythonic.net

Re: Should .a library contains non-reallocatable code?

2015-02-23 Thread Jeff Epler
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 05:19:30PM -0600, Jeff Epler wrote: > * foomodule is a Python wrapper for libfoo, so it must be shipped >as a .so, but if it links libfoo.a, and libfoo.a is not -fPIC, >it is not possible to build foomodule at all > >(The same goes for wrapp

Re: Minified javascripts in packages

2015-04-15 Thread Jeff Epler
n't see this rule mentioned specifically. Is this a rule or just a very strong preference? Jeff -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/2

Re: VI reasons (was Re: Base Set: Suggested additions & removals.)

1998-06-15 Thread Jeff Sheinberg
just rubs me the wrong way. Perhaps others react to ae in a similar way? Cheers, -- Jeff Sheinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: suggestion - AntiVir for Linux

1998-10-09 Thread Jeff Noxon
e a virus scanner on my Linux machine, since I receive a lot of Windoze e-mail attachments and have several Samba shares. Regards, Jeff -- It's time to close windows and open source. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.

Re: X window logo

1998-10-09 Thread Jeff Noxon
with no offense intended toward the kind person who created the current one!) But I can't draw, so I guess I should shut up. :-) How did we arrive at the current logo? My memory stinks. Regards, Jeff -- It's time to close windows and open source. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.

lack of wstring in libstdc++2.8-dev

1998-10-10 Thread Jeff McWilliams
okay, but adding basic_string{wchar_t} sString2 really causes it to blow up. I'm using the following line to compile: c++ -o test test.cpp Also, shouldn't the above code require a "using namespace std" before main, or for me to use "std::basic_string sString;" ?? Jeff

Re: Debian logo

1998-10-10 Thread Jeff Noxon
n the constition is in > place. Maybe I'll do it. Please contact me if you want to work with me on > the exact wording. > > > How did we arrive at the current logo? My memory stinks. > > Bruce made the decision after unfruitful efforts on the logo pages. Ah. :-) Regar

Re: Bug Report?

1998-10-14 Thread Jeff McWilliams
tee what is on the queue. For example, some other process (unrelated to our sample program) might be waiting to run - in which case, neither the parent nor the child would be scheduled next. Therefore, don't use sched_yield to enforce a particular scheduling order. It's too simple

Re: IA32 vs i386

1998-10-15 Thread Jeff Noxon
t misleading. It also leaves the possibility for a Debian distribution with packages optimized for (and possibly requiring) newer x86 chips. Regards, Jeff

Re: What Bruce had to say about non-Pixar names. Re: what's after slink

1998-10-17 Thread Jeff Noxon
get better? Chilly Willy was another famous cartoon penguin. Regards, Jeff -- It's time to close windows and open source. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds.

Re: Communicator - glibc2.1 breakage

1999-05-14 Thread Jeff Noxon
Java/Javascript, etc. I use Lynx/SSL for most of my browsing. The speed grabs me. Regards Jeff On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 03:59:59AM +0200, Martin Bialasinski wrote: > > Hi, > > we all know that netscape communicator is fscked up with glibc2.1 :-( > (bus error when closing windows

Re: APRIS GNU/LINUX EXPO UPDATES. (need debian Logo).

1999-09-16 Thread Jeff Teunissen
S to Gimp XCF directly. Note: The color change to the darker red was my doing, but nothing else has been changed -- I still have original-colored pristine EPS and XCF sources, if anyone wants them. -- | Jeff Teunissen -- President, Dusk To Dawn Computing -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Disclaimer: I am m

Re: libc recently more aggressive about pthread locks in stable ?

2016-11-06 Thread Jeff Epler
.g., https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671785#48 Jeff

Re: Bash different behaviour in jessie versus stretch (maybe a regression?)

2017-01-09 Thread Jeff Epler
I think these changes are both deliberate and documented in the release notes. Jeff

Re: Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly

2017-02-17 Thread Jeff Epler
testing, I tried sbuilding libsecret. So far, 2/2 builds failed. # grep ^FAIL libsecret_*.build libsecret_i386-2017-02-17T14:42:53Z.build:FAIL: test-collection 18 /collection/delete-sync libsecret_i386-2017-02-17T14:50:00Z.build:FAIL: test-collection 18 /collection/delete-sync Jeff

Re: Openvas too old - suggestion

2017-05-24 Thread Jeff Epler
f Debian. Only once Stretch is released will "testing" (which will then be known by the codename "Buster") start getting new versions from "unstable". Jeff

Re: Help needed for #871234 FTBFS with GCC-7: error: type/value mismatch

2017-09-05 Thread Jeff Epler
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 01:55:58PM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > GHash.hh:91:44: error: type/value mismatch at argument 1 in template > parameter list for 'template struct std::hash' > while (pos

Re: Renaming the Debian Project

2015-12-30 Thread Jeff Garra
"Being that the current year is almost 2016 and is 20 years after Debian started" Yes, let's rename a project because of an arbitrary date. That makes perfect sense. No it doesn't, that is absurd. "because having the project named after a white supremacist" Those are some pretty serious accusati

<    1   2