On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 10:27, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:08:18AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > > I think there's a consensus that the DFSG and Social Contract are poorly > > phrased; [...] > > Uh, no, there's not. That you don't understand the terms, or misinterpret > them, doesn't mean they absolutely need to be changed.
I didn't claim a consensus on whether they should be *changed*; I claimed a consensus on whether they should be *clarified*. A clarification that "documentation = software for the purposes of the DFSG", or Branden's proposals in debian-legal, wouldn't be changes, for example. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
