Holger Levsen (2016-07-05):
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:01:10PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > I still wonder if a fork of the last linux:src=4.4, updated to bring
> > it to linux-4.4.14 would be a lower support burden? I'm still finding
> > that there are a fair number of issues reported
e ftp team when they end up dealing with such requests, since
priority changes led to some fun/fallout during the installation process
in the past.
Regarding this specific case I see Tianon's already followed up, so I'll
go quiet now. :)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)
le without any pre-approval *should* be
fine. I'm sure we might be able to construct, or might even encounter,
counterexamples, but I lack imagination right now.
> (subject to the usual release team approval, "targeted changes only",
> etc. that apply to all frozen packa
ing for it, it just happened to show up on one of
my specific “important for the release” radars…)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois (2025-05-12):
> I do realize it might make some maintainers nervous as the next few days
> are the last ones before the hard freeze (scheduled 2025-05-15), and I
> do apologize for creating this awkward situation.
The very few packages that were out of sync betwee
Santiago Vila (2025-05-17):
> El 17/5/25 a las 1:13, Cyril Brulebois escribió:
> > Soren Stoutner (2025-05-05):
> > > Filing these bug reports sounds like a good idea to me. I don’t see
> > > any reason to wait as these will be severity:minor, so they won’t
>
.debian.org/raspi-team/image-specs/-/issues/75
You'll find some hindsight about upstream support by Rafael Diniz
and Daniel Moran in the first one.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consu
701 - 707 of 707 matches
Mail list logo
