On 2005-12-12, Linas Zvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A user should get the same visual feeling whether he chose GNOME or KDE
> for his desktop, whether he decided for KDM or GDM etc. This might sound
Why try to make kde and gnome look the same?
If it is a goal to make all Bob User desktops
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: comixcursors
Version : 0.3.2
Upstream Author : Jens Luetkens
* URL : http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=32627
* License : GPL
Description : X11
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kde-icons-korilla
Version : 1.3.5
Upstream Author : Patrick Yavitz pyavitz (at) gmail.com
* URL : http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=7264
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kde-icons-gorilla
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Patrick Yavitz
* URL : http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=6927
* License : GPL
Description : Yel
On 2006-09-05, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In short, as first approximation, I support the removal and I would
> consider any other further action by anyone else not involved in the
> pkg development as rude action.
Hi Christian
Don't you think that it is just typos in the bug
Hi!
I have started to wonder a bit about 'missing days' - a thing that is
especially importaint now when we are heading for a total freeze.
>From http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/udev.html:
Too young, only 1 of 10 days old
[2006-10-15] Accepted 0.100-2.1 in unstable (low)
and here my math works
On 2006-10-17, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But here:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kwin-style-crystal.html
> Too young, only 1 of 10 days old
> [2006-10-13] Accepted 1.0.2-1 in unstable (low)
hmm... one day has just gone here. now 2 of 10 (But I still miss
["Followup-To:" header set to gmane.linux.debian.devel.general.]
On 2006-11-11, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In all of the following discussion, no one has ever said
> anything about *WHY* policy states that clean must undo what build
> does. Unless we are clear on the r
On 2006-12-05, Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't see "seen" as a supported tag in the BTS documentation, and
'confirmed' maybe?
- but having 20 importaint bugs in one package and 1 wishlist in
another package -- in my world the 20 importaint bugs gets higher
priority
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kwin-style-crystal
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Sascha Hlusiak spam84 (at) gmx.de
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=13969
* License : GPL
On 2006-05-27, Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Odd, because my package depends on libapr0-dev (probably going to be
> libapr0-dev | libapr1-dev soon), and an apt-cache search for "0-dev" on my
The versionings is when stuff change to incompatible APIs, so probably
depending on (l
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kwin-style-dekorator
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : moty rahamim
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=31447
* License : GPL
Programming La
On 2006-06-22, David H. Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, my question is: Is there an equivalent cmd for 'start' (e.g. for
> KDE)?
kfmclient exec foobar.odt
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kwin-style-serenity
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Remi Villatel
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=35954
* License : GPL
Programming La
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kde-style-serenity
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Remi Villatel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=35954
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kommando
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Daniel Stoeckel
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=29514
* License : GPL
Description : A whee
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kde-windeco-powder
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Remi Villatel
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=29935
* License : GPL
Description
On 2008-02-02, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://wiki.debian.org/debian/patches
It claims that debian/patches is "not very convenient for very big
projects"
I very much don't agree. I am quite satisfied with working with
debian/patches and quilt and cdbs simple patchsys.
But of
Dear Debian-Devel, we need your advices.
Yesterday, we (the qt-kde packagers) uploaded qt3 version 3.3.8b. The biggest
differences over 3.3.7 is that it is now also gplv3 licensed.
And then this bug report came:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465028 - libqt3-mt: Missing
weak
On 2008-02-11, Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:44:02PM +0100, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465028 - libqt3-mt: Missing
>> weak symbols for stat64 functions
>
> libqt3-mt isn't suppo
On 2008-02-10, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D465028 - libqt3-mt: Miss=
> ing=20
> weak symbols for stat64 functions
>
> basically, in qt3 3:3.3.7-9 and earlier, libqt3-mt seems to provide some=20
> symbols:
>
On 2008-03-01, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I ask:
> - Who is in charge for taking such a decision ?
Release team
> - Where can I appeal ?
Tech-ctte
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2008-03-06, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 12:15:09AM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
>> Hello dear developers,
>>
>> As you may have noticed, a new architecture, armel, has been added to
>> Debian. Here are some highlights and a bit of information in a nutshell.
On 2008-03-10, Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it unlikely that the DAM, DPL, TC, and DSA would block useful
> updates to Debian for six months
Welcome to real world.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
On 2008-03-30, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --0IvGJv3f9h+YhkrH
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Michael Biebl wrote:
>> > - update-icon-caches
>> > - update-desktop-database
>> >These are not
On 2008-04-10, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > relieve system administrators of some of the drudgery of manually editing
>> the
>> > symbolic links.
>>
>> What's the advantage over exisiting tools like sysv-
On 2008-04-16, Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This isn't helpful for several reasons:
> a) Burying this information in a wiki where people may or may not read
> it in time (I just reverted a change already done in SVN).
I got the idea of pushing it out when Hertzog was talking about sen
On 2008-04-19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The newest fad in Mass bug closings is:
> All bugs against package "nurd5" have been automatically closed without
> further review,
> as "nurd5" has been removed from Debian.
>
> OK, fair enough, until one checks deeper and
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Jose Luis Tallon wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Jose Luis Tallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: mumble
> Version : 1.1.3
> Upstream Author : Mikkel Krautz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others
> * URL : http://mumble.sou
On 2008-04-19, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --=-DjuXQ9s0AhDVtNsDjVrA
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Le samedi 19 avril 2008 =E0 07:06 +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi a =E9crit :
>> I intend to hijack GnuPG[1]
>
> It wou
On 2008-05-02, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 07:36:25PM +, Sune Vuorela wrot
On 2008-05-03, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the MIA status of its only maintainer. On the contrary you have been
> speculating on the future (in)ability of someone to maintain gpg.
> Anyhow, my post has probably been too rude and I'm sorry for that, but I
> really don't think tha
Hi!
Noticing among others this bug report
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=322751 and observing the
many packages depending on $MTA | mail-transport-agent with $MTA having
values like postfix, exim, exim4, sendmail, nullmailer and probably others.
And some packages just dependi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: arora
Version : 0.2~git-of-the-day
Upstream Author : Benjamin Meyer
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/arora
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++ / Qt
Descr
On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am working on cleaning up the packaging of my project (GDCM) using
> cmake so that the .deb produced is consistant with the debian package.
> I was wondering if anyone had done the work before ? I am currently
> struggl
On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> I am working o
On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> What do you mean ? Indeed I want the whole process from src to .deb
>>> handled by cmake.
>>
>> Then please forget it. That doesn't make proper debs.
>
> because...
Because they doesn't use
- dpkg-shlibdeps
- python-support|python-c
On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And this is where the cmake folks are wrong (I once wrote them a long
email about it).
>>>
>>> link, please ?
>>
>> To Alex Neundorff and Bill Hoffmann.
>
> I originally wrote the deb plugin, Alex simply integrated in cmake. If
>
On 2008-06-16, William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That doesn't strike me as a valid configuration. Infact, it shouldn't
> work with lilo because lilo wants /boot to be on a real device. The fact
> that it does should be considered a bug, not a feature.
lilo-22.8$ head debian/patches/01_d
On 2008-06-16, William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That patch only makes lilo map LVMs to an appropriate physical device.
> It does not guarantee that you will be able to boot off of an LV on a
> physical volume. As such, the behaviour is still undefined.
>
> Consider a situation where /bo
On 2008-06-23, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> for months, looking at you drowning in your brain-dead system, you
> should try to write patches to make cdbs and/or debhelper 7 work
> transparently with cmake. This is the right way, and it requires much
cdbs already works pretty well
On 2009-07-29, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On the contrary, I think you are missing the point. The
> work-unit put in by developers is not the only issue this brings up,
>
> We do not want to have different helper package start inventing
> a helper specific way of building ddebs,
On 2009-08-10, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I would also add that the debug symbols should live in
> "/usr/lib/debug/" . /full/path/to/lib_or_binary, blessing the current
> practice.
You are missing the new features of build-id as written earlier by
insisting on this.
/Sune
--
To UNSUB
On 2009-08-10, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10 2009, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>
>> On 2009-08-10, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>> I would also add that the debug symbols should live in
>>> "/usr/lib/debug/" . /full/path/to/lib_or_binary, blessing
On 2009-08-11, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hmm. I see very little benefit here. Firstly, to use build id,
> you have to intercept the upstream build system and add --build-id
> (and perhaps the --build-id-style) option to ld, instead of the current
> method of letting the upstream build h
On 2009-08-13, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> track of a simple version, I suggest we start thinking about removing
> DD status from people based on a track record of incompetence.
Yes please.
But looking at S-V as a primary factor here is not the right thing.
More like "frequently introduces rc b
On 2009-09-02, Jens Peter Secher wrote:
> 2009/9/2 Torsten Werner :
>>
>> why is it a native package? Why do we need this package in Debian that got
>> removed recently from unstable? I would expect an explanation either in bug
>> #541265 or in the changelog.
>
>>From the changelog:
>
> * Upstre
On 2009-09-07, Andrew R Kelley wrote:
> --000e0cd3b27cf19d880472f5f8d4
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Can we have amarok 1.4 as an option to use? in my opinion, amarok 2 is not
> usable yet. I decided to give it a try when it replaced 1.4 in squeeze, but
> it's missing many 1.4
On 2009-10-26, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> --=-7ZxixtYBhhZyQIGhRFTI
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Le lundi 26 octobre 2009 =C3=A0 01:17 +0100, Norbert Preining a =C3=A9crit =
>:=20
>> I would suggest on the contrary that HOME *will* b
On 2009-10-26, Adam Majer wrote:
> People are lazy and like myself don't want to sync pbuilder and
> related stuff every time I want to upload something. Since my box is
heard of cron?
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
On 2009-11-02, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
>> Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
>> important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of
>> GNU
>> binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when
>> building
>> you
On 2009-11-02, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 02/11/09 at 12:12 +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>>
>> Binutils-gold is not the default. It is a bit 'stricter' in how it
>> works, but it is notably faster.
> I was talking about not making --no-add-needed the default
On 2009-11-18, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> I am a bit confused with respect to how buildd autosigning is required
> for this. It makes it sound somehow like it would affect porter binary
Basicalyl, the turnaround time is too long if we have to wait for manual
buildd signings.
For example, when we u
On 2009-11-19, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:16:41PM +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> On 2009-11-18, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>> > I am a bit confused with respect to how buildd autosigning is required
>> > for this. It makes it sound somehow like it
On 2009-11-25, Roberto C Sánchez wrote:
>
> --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:43:12PM -0500, Roberto C. S=E1nchez wrote:
>>=20
>> Does that mean that I am per
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela
* Package name: Shared-desktop-ontologies
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Sebastian Trueg and others
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/oscaf/files/
* License : BSD & cc-by 3.0
Programming Lang:
On 2009-11-28, Luk Claes wrote:
> Andreas Marschke wrote:
>> On Saturday 28 November 2009 09:46:51 Luk Claes wrote:
>
>>> gnat-4.4 FTBFS on mipsel which is blocking gcc-defaults from migrating
>>> to testing which is blocking at least the poppler and gnome related
>>> transitions. xulrunner was re
On 2009-12-24, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Have you got any suggestions for increasing productivity with proper
> IDE support for medium-sized C and C++ code bases?
>
kdevelop as in debiean expermental
/sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
On 2007-02-09, Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - The backtick version is not easily readable in high resolution screens
> or in terminals with small fonts
Solution: get glasses.
> - There may be problems in distinguishing character ' from ` with sme
> particularly sel
On 2007-02-22, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Strangely, packages.debian.org's page for bacula-console shows
> 1.38.11-7+b1 on all platforms except kfreebsd-i386. It doesn't make
> sense why the package would be bin NMU'd everywhere.
maybe problems with one of the dependencies made a r
On 2007-02-22, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 22-Feb-07, 11:00 (CST), Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > (This problem was reported in bug #411652)
>> >
>> > I think someone deserves a serious thwacking...
>>
>> Ma
with the bugs instead of
punishing people ?
You and others are most welcome to take a stab at the 1000 open bugs
against the official kdepackages.
Start here:
http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/bugs.html
Thanks in advance.
/Sune Vuorela
Member of the debian & qt maintainers
--
To UNS
On 2007-02-26, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have to completely disagree here. When I started in earnest with the
> effort to clean up the sasl package, I literally spent three twelve hour
> days in a row doing nothing but bug triage. I really am not surprised
> that people ha
On 2007-02-26, Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> xorg just sees activitiy to look at bugs (and it was really overdue),
> libc is a beast of itself. For the others I have no strong preference,
the x-maintainers have been lucky by having a Brice Gogling suddenly
dropping in and pinging a
On 2007-02-26, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All of those are obvious plusses in the big picture view of the project as=
>=20
> whole and the relationship of the project with our users.
Welcome as the new helper in the kde bugs in debian.
/me goes back to his bugs for no
On 2007-02-26, Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure. For doing some Work on such projects as glibc (Low level tools,
> I'm not the frontend programmer). But then come to another problem, (and
In the kde team where I are, we work in a svn archive where non-DDs like
me have commit access -
On 2007-02-27, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> maintainers not always responsing to bugs, then probably the simplest
> thing to do would be to code up a view in the BTS that lists bugs that
> have not had a maintainer response (filtering out responses that appear
> to be from the bug submitt
On 2007-02-28, Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> anyway. Otherwise suggesting "you may forward it upstream and/or send a patch"
> is a bad joke.
Why is it a bad joke ?
let us take `kmail' - it has around 2500 bugs in the upstream bugzilla -
and 100 bugs not forwarded in debian.
In or
On 2007-03-01, Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A third party organization, dunc-tank, which included a number of
> prominent Debian Developers, including AJ, did pay for two of the
How can it be a third party organization if it is launched by the DPL
_as_ DPL ?
(Source: AJs DPL review
On 2007-03-27, Roberto C Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In fact, yes. More so, even. The higher the bug count the *greater*
> the reward for triaging everything properly. It helps to prevent
> getting mired in a sea of bugs.
We still miss around 600 bugs in our backlog:
http://users.alio
On 2007-04-12, Lawrence Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On April 12, 2007 11:34:00 am Chris Lamb wrote:
>> Pierre THIERRY wrote:
>> > If not, which ones?
>>
>> + http://www.gnewsense.org/ ?
>
> Gentoo has done renames of Mozilla products such as Firefox too.
I asked one of my local gentoo d
On 2007-04-19, Evgeni Golov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can find a list of the packages here:
> http://files.die-welt.net/bad-depends-in-sid
There are some false positives. AFAIK at least kde* is binNMU'able.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
On 2007-04-22, Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd be interested to see some numbers on the archive size impact - my
> experience with C++ suggests that the size inflation caused by debug
> symbols can be enormous.
Openoffice currently ships a -g1 -dbg package. If it wasn't -g1, the deb
wo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: soprano
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Sebastian Trueg and others
* URL : http://www.kde.org/
* License : LGPL-2
Programming Lang: C++, Qt
Description
On 2007-05-09, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> chrooting into the dir, the error is that base-files postinst
> cannot find awk. mawk had indeed been configured earlier. So, while
> /etc/alternatives/awk exists, and points to mawk, there is no symlink
> /usr/bin/awk created.
On 2007-05-09, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 May 2007, [ISO-8859-1] Andr=E9 Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira wrote:
[A bunch of nice positive words about the idea and the concept and ...]
> I might add that I'm trying to develop some themes for presentations
> especially for LaTeX b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: eigen
Version : 1.0.5
Upstream Author : Benoit Jacob (jacob at math jussieu fr) and others
* URL : http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/
* License : GPL + incorporate-i
On 2007-05-29, Pascal Speck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, i have a big problem with debian packaging.
> I need to create debian packages of a program i've written, but i don't
> know how to solve the following problem.
>
> I want to have one Source Tree with a Subdirectory Drivers.
> When d
On 2007-06-04, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --=_Part_840_15471732.1180961520043
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> Then, would simply "sturmbahn" be a suitable name for the pac
On 2008-07-06, Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> fd.o menus are designed to allow distro-specific policy. It's the matter
> of Debian KDE/Gnome packaging/menu policy to get the proper subset of
> the packages in menu (e.g. moving Gnome/gtk applications deeper in KDE
> menu and Qt/KDE - i
On 2008-07-06, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > of Debian KDE/Gnome packaging/menu policy to get the proper subset of
>> > the packages in menu (e.g. moving Gnome/gtk applications deeper in KDE
>> > menu and Qt/KDE - in Gnome one).
>>
>> The users should have equal access to good progra
On 2008-07-07, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> /usr/lib/debug/$pathoforiginalfile
>
> This is where gdb is going to look for these debug info.
>
I thought gdb was looking at the .gnu_debuglink section as created with
objcopy?
Qt4 at least creates debug stuff slightly diferent, but are
On 2008-09-08, Eugene V. Lyubimkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My proposal is make the new file named, for example, debian/divergences, =
> containing
> important for end users changes made in Debian package. Suggested format =
> may be the same
> we are using now to display lists in packages' lon
On 2008-09-18, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The situation is now critical, indeed. Even though the decision is not
>> yet taken, there are risks that we (D-I team) finally decide to
>> de-activate Danish.
>
On Monday 29 September 2008 20:40:24 Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Leopold Palomo Avellaneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: solid
> Version : 3.5.6
> Upstream Author : Gino van den Bergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL
On 2008-10-06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>sqlite3
>
> If this is 500792, I'm not sure what has gone wrong with this one - it
> was downgraded, fixed and then upgraded.
It just needs to migrate to lenny.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On 2008-10-12, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've brought this up in the past on debian-devel, but didn't follow
> through at the time. We have lots of X-based terminal programs (xterm,
> rxvt, gnome-terminal, konsole, ...) which Provide:
> x-terminal-emulator. That's great and useful
On 2008-10-12, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sune wrote:
>>I dont think supporting title and stuff should be required for providing
>>x-terminal-emulator. I think we could require to handle -e properly, but
>>not much more than that.
>
> Out of curiosity, why not support setting of ti
On 2008-10-16, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are some DDs or -devel@ readers involved into Sidux development?
>
> What's their exact technical model? They duplicate the whole archive, or
> just change a few packages and use the normal Debian archive for the
> rest of the packa
On 2008-11-23, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Please quote from the original email explaining to me how it is sexist.
>
> Sexism defines the ideology of male supremacy, of male superiority and
> of beliefs that support and sustain it. Sexism and patriarchy
> mutually reinforce one anoth
On 2008-11-30, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> kdebase-workspace-bin
> kde-window-manager
is in experimental.
> system-config-printer-common
> system-config-printer-gnome
I am planning to request this split of system-config-printer quite soon,
so that we when next kde
On 2008-12-03, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Michael Tautschnig]
>> Instead, currently, they get distracted by many easy-to-spot errors
>> (including lintian warnings/errors, which really doesn't require one
>> to be an ftp-master to see...).
>
> This issue could be solved by au
On 2008-12-03, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> And from my maintainer point of view, lintian becomes more and more
>> irrelevant, as it warns about more and more stupidities, so the real
>> issues i
On 2008-12-04, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Latest, the warning about quilt patches without any description. Sure it
>> is nice to have a description, but I don't need lintian to tell it.
>
> I d
On 2008-12-04, Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will try to work on a dh-like command (or maybe a patch against dh_strip,
> depends on what Joey prefers) that will basically scan
> debian/*/foo-dbg/usr/lib/debug/(*) and try to find a file under debian/*/
> matching the subgrouped expre
On 2008-12-04, Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using ORed depends, I forgot to say.
How would OR'ed depends work?
let us look at a example:
package: kdepim-dbg
depends: korganizer (= ${binary:Version})|kaddressbook (=${binary:version})
version: 4.1.3-1
now, I install korganizer 4.
On 2008-12-18, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> As to the people who emailed me that they are putting together a
> petition for the DAM to have me removed from the project, I hear you
> too.
I don't like this.
> I am going to spend the next few days evaluating how important the
> project i
On 2008-12-18, Russell Coker wrote:
> culture. It is even sometimes used without the intent to make an accusation
> of homosexuality.
> Joss was intending to make an insinuation of homosexuality in order to
> offend.
I think you are seeing ghosts or just being prejudistic against
homosexuals.
On 2008-12-20, David Paleino wrote:
>> >Hello,
>> >trying to look at RC bugs, I just stumbled upon this one.
>> >IMHO it's not severity serious, since binary packages are built in clean
>> >chroots. Hence you don't have wx2.6 installed, but just the Build-Deps, =
> i.e.
>> >wx2.8.
>> >It's still "
On 2008-12-20, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:12:48AM +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> >> I don't agree with your arguing. Serious is defined as "severe violation
>> >> of Debian policy (roughly, it violates a "must" or "req
1 - 100 of 358 matches
Mail list logo
