On 2007-02-26, Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > xorg just sees activitiy to look at bugs (and it was really overdue), > libc is a beast of itself. For the others I have no strong preference,
the x-maintainers have been lucky by having a Brice Gogling suddenly dropping in and pinging all the bugs if they still apply. All the other mentioned teams could use a clone of him. > Hey, I was speaking about not releasing such packages at all (perhaps > except libc and the kernel (at least until hurd is ready ;->)). So Eh? you say that they should not migrate to testing ? > no problem at that front. After all, if noone reads the bug reports > anway, how should one find security relevant ones? The bug reports might be read, but not answered. There is no reason to send a content-less pong to a bug report. And often security issues are reported at RC severity, so no problems. > than to punish. (What about forcing NMs to take a look at a dozen > bugs in high-profile packages not yet answered, trying to verify them > and collect some data on them?) I think 'forcing' is bad, but it could be a starting-platform for those on hold in am-wait. And you are still welcome to help. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
