in?
>
Ok, Yes, if push comes to shove, I'll be happy to stand trial for the
inclusion of hot-babe in main.
Now, can we stop this stupid debate about something that is clearly a
non-technical issue and get on with doing what we do best?
Oh wait, this is d-d, isn't it...
Regards
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:58:42PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I would strongly caution against using Sarge for a production system
> until there is security team support. See this message I posted to d-u
> when someone pointed out that they were running sarge on some servers:
>
> http:/
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 07:45:12PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> >I subscribe to debian-security (+ d-s-announce) and get reports whenever
> >there's anything released.
> >I know what is installed on my boxes, so I know if this announcement
> >affects me.
> >
> You are probably in the minority, t
ebian.org/msg10770.html
Many thanks,
Neil McGovern
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
w upstream available, but it may be quite hard to package
hawhaw-doc.
If no one wants them, I'll ask for their removal.
Regards,
Neil McGovern
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 09:19:09PM +0200, Mikko Ma Aaltonen wrote:
> Hi Debian developers. (My first time post here.)
>
> I'm here to ask, if anyone of you know,
> has someone done some development work to get a Nokia (or some other
> brand) mobile to work with some other operating system than Sym
nference
> > you'll get involved in the future and help to make it even better.
>
> I am perfectly happy with the way the conference is being run. I am
> opposing those people who want the organisers to change the way it is
> being run, such that DFSG-nonfree papers will be th
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 07:11:26PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> Your ideas reminds me of the Mandriva Club system, where users can
[Snip]
Sounds like an idea that's being thrown around at the moment:
http://wiki.debian.org/FriendsOfDebian
:P
Neil
--
__
.` `. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:19:42PM -0500, Frans Jessop wrote:
> Ubuntu's launchpad is amazing. Do you think it would be helpful if all
> DD's worked through it on their projects? Wouldn't that keep things more
> organized and efficient? Or perhaps Debian could build its own version of
> launc
at progress has been made recently :)
All the best,
Neil McGovern
[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2005/04/msg00103.html
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=264069
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/08/msg01976.html
[3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 03:38:51PM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> If I understand well, those two names could be interesting:
>
> - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I find the first one a little bit ugly (the "webapp" word is not that
> clean for a mailing list I think) and I also
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 10:01:42AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 01:33:08PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > Eh, because you believe a new lists.d.o list could take a bit of delay,
> > an alioth list is better?
> >
> > Sorry, but I don't agree with the reasoning -- lis
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:21:30AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> >>>If interested people would think a l.d.o list
> >>>is better, that could also be nice.
> >>
> >>Once you've got me convinced the list is a good idea, it usually doesn't
> >>take too long to creat
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 11:54:07AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Neil McGovern wrote:
> >As per the list creation guidelines, I'll suggest the following, unless
> >anyone can improve on it:
>
> Ok, thanks.
>
> I sent your report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and retitl
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 07:48:11AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Nico Golde]
> > what about including the possibility of an RFS in reportbug?
> > I think this would be a good idea because I often see RFS
> > requests which are totally stupid.
> Well, either way, I'd suggest a separate script.
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 01:17:19AM -0700, Stephen Birch wrote:
> Today the EU gets to vote on the same issue. They can elect to have a
> thriving software industry well placed to replace the now crippled USA
> as the dominant force in the software industry.
They went for the former :)
http://www.
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 12:02:37PM +0200, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
> * Package name: pdfcrack
>
[snip]
> This software uses xpdf/poppler stuff (categorized as free).
>
Hi there,
Does this use xpdf or poppler? :)
poppler is a fork of xpdf which allows dynamic linking, so is much
preferr
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 05:37:58PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > also sprach Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.01.1221 +0100]:
> >> Building in chroots *hides* bugs.
> >
> > Uh, what? Please give an example.
>
> Missing Build-Confli
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 03:54:02PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings, and thank you all so much for your usual fantastic work on
> Debian!
>
> I just wanted to make a few observations about the recent decision to
> scrap m68k from etch:
>
[snip reasons which are complaining about other arc
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:31:01AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 25 octobre 2006 à 01:03 -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> > Here is a first draft of changes to the policy that I think
> > are required to bring ot closer in line with extant practice. I
> > removed portion
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: libphp-clam
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Gareth Ardron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://freshmeat.net/projects/php-clam/
License : GPL
Description : PHP bindings for libclamav
A small module that
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-27
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: drivel
Version : 0.9.1
Upstream Author : Todd Kulesza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/drivel/
* License : GPL
Description : A LiveJourna
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 11:15:23AM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
>
> > example, which has a somewhat similar package description). I think
> > the service is popular enough that you don't need to explain what it
> > is, in the same way that you don't need
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 11:41:43PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> * Package name: raptor
> Version : 1.0.0
> Upstream Author : Jon Rafkind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://raptorv2.sourceforge.net/
> * License : probably GPL, see below
> Description : a ve
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 10:40:15PM +0200, Angathule wrote:
>
> I'm trying to install KDE on a Sid Machine, but I can't, this is what I
> do:
>
I've got:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] $ apt-cache show libsensors1
Package: libsensors1
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: libs
Installed
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 09:49:46PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On Friday, Jun 27, 2003, at 11:05 US/Eastern, Luca - De Whiskey's - De
> Vitis wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 12:32:59AM +0100, Millis Miller wrote:
>>> * License : Custom
>> Its license is non-free, not "Custom":
>>
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 12:14:49PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > software
> >n : (computer science) written programs or procedures or
> >rules and associated documentation pertaining to the
> >operatio
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:16:15PM -0700, David Schleef wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:53:55AM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 02:34:56PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>>
>> | The Debian Social Contract says "Debian Will Remain 100% Free Software".
>> | If there are th
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-05
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: tkgamma
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Pixel Fairy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pixel.fairyden.net/tkgamma/
* License : GPL
Description : A simple color c
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-31
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: hawxy
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Norbert Huffschmid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.hawhaw.de
* License : GPL
Description : a script that makes PHP-en
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-31
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: hawhaw
Version : 5.0.0
Upstream Author : Norbert Huffschmid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.hawhaw.de/
* License : LGPL
Description : a PHP toolkit to create
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:17:43PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> So letting NMs wait for months without notice makes it better?
> Please explain this to me.
Personally, I think that this is the major problem with the process at
the moment. If it takes the applicant 2 years to get through the
proces
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 04:25:03PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:50:03AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Then he should spend the 10 minutes it takes to implement a "reject"
> > button on the webpage he ca
www.example.org/
License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description : This is the short description
(Include the long description here.)
------
Regards,
Neil McGovern
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 01:58:55PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Yaroslav Halchenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050801 12:20]:
> > I'm not sure if any additional AMs are necessary -- there is a
> > sufficient quantity of them to cover all current DD applicants...
>
> We would need more good AMs, we hav
lace debconf.
>
> Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>blootbot
>
Fixed.
Neil
--
__
.Ž `. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' !
`. `Ž gpg: B345BDD3
`- Please don't cc, I'm subscribed to the list
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:18:10AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see that alioth/haydn is down in the IRC channel topic,
> and trying to ssh to the server seems to confirm the situation.
>
> Is this a scheduled downtime that I missed an annoucement for or
> some unexpected breakage? (
stylee)
* Sync with mentors.debian.net for automatically detecting sources
So, please pop along and register.
All the best,
Neil McGovern
--
__
.Ž `. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' !
`. `Ž gpg: B345BDD3
`- Please don't cc, I'm subscribed to the list
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package name: roundcube
Version : 0.1-20051007
Upstream Author : Thomas Bruederli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.example.or
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 04:46:40PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Package name: roundcube
> Version : 0.1-20051007
> Upstream Author : Thomas Bruederli <[EMAIL PROTECTE
l over limewire. The only limewire I know of is
a p2p application, which doesn't have any subscriptions.
If you're using this application, I suggest you stop using it.
Regards,
Neil McGovern
--
__
.´ `. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Application Manager
: :' ! | Sec
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 04:16:51PM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> "Debian Desktop Edition" for most of the release cycle.
>
There is no Debian Desktop Edition. Perhaps you mean the Debian Desktop
subproject?
> This is a useful (but unintended) side-effect. The principal
> goal remains that Testing s
Hi all,
Just to re-iterate from a release team PoV, this could really do with
fixing.
(for d-d readers, this is a awesome bug, where dbus upgrades kill X)
This is holding up xcb-util, which is holding up python-visual, which is
preventing the removal (finally!) of GTK 1
Thanks,
Neil
--
hermanr
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:50:02PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Just to re-iterate from a release team PoV, this could really do with
> fixing.
> (for d-d readers, this is a awesome bug, where dbus upgrades kill X)
>
> This is holding up xcb-util, which is holding up python-v
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:45:14AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Giving a standard interface to reviewers is a laudable goal, but I do not see
> reviewers except in elaborate scenarios about security. Therefore I will not
> trade a real benefit for a hypothetical one, even if both are neglectible.
anual-DRAFT.sgml?view=log
Comments appreciated, I'd like to get these all in and integrated by end
of August, to push to the policy team for inclusion.
Thanks,
Neil McGovern
--
automake: the emo of Debian software. "You just don't understand me."
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 04:47:54PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 01 septembre 2009 à 15:36 +0100, Chris Jackson a écrit :
> > Well, /etc needs to be on /, since otherwise you can't get to fstab to
> > mount it, and generally things like /etc/hostname will be different, so,
> > while
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 12:25:51PM +0100, Penny Leach wrote:
> The problem we've come across is how to handle migrations. If we have a
> moodle package, that depends on moodle-mysql | moodle-pgsql, then package
> managers that just install the first dependency, could cause a situation,
> for examp
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 02:48:56PM +0100, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
> Should the web configuration be enabled by default? Assume apache2, and
> add configuration to /etc/apache2/conf.d/munin.conf?
>
Have a read of
http://webapps-common.alioth.debian.org/draft/html/ch-httpd.html
Neil
--
aut
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 03:23:22PM +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> Full ack, and I even like /usr/share/www. It's easy to understand and
> pretty unprobable that we'd have a package called www in the archive
> some day needing this location.
>
Sorry, I have to disagree with this approach. We woul
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: resiprocate
Version : 1.1rc1
Upstream Author : ReSIProcate Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.resiprocate.org
License : Vovida Software Licen
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 10:43:31PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> For this to work properly, all init.d scripts need to provide
> dependency information.
[snip]
> Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>blootbot
Blootbot requires a mysql database to be up and running, or it
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 07:31:29PM +0300, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> pirmadienis 18 rugpjūtis 2008, thacrazze rašė:
> > in the Amarok package is a security issue
> >
> > It is fixed in Amarok 1.4.10
> >(http://secunia.com/advisories/31418/,
> > http://amarok.kde.org/en/releases/1/4/10)
> Th
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:33:49PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 08:46:18PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > It seems we relied primarily on the release team, which has betrayed
> > > the goals of the project,
> >
> >
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 04:31:00PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 08:48:50AM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > While fixing
> > these issues is and should be a goal of Debian, it's hardly something
> > that can be done in the last few weeks before releasing.
>
> If I
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:51:22PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:23:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 October 2008, you wrote:
> > > But, in fact, fixes are not welcome from the team. They have raised a
> > > major roadblock, allowing only one kind of fix wh
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 07:06:14PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 05:41:05PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:51:22PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:23:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > &
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 11:40:22PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Where do I go from here to make sure the issue gets the appropriate
> level of thought and consideration that it deserves (after lenny gets
> released of course)?
>
Dropping lots of CCs.
Hi Michael,
I'd suggest asking on debian-
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 08:50:46PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli schrieb:
> > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 10:58:57AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> >> Why is this important mail hidden in -devel? I wouldn't have noticed it
> >> if I hadn't read something about this on planet-debia
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:07:12PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 16/12/08 at 14:21 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> > I think this question is nonsense. While the bug-fix rate was more or
> > less the same since the last two releases, it looks like in this release
> > we actually started the fre
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:13:41AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Adeodato Simó writes:
>
> > What does §4.1.7 mean, then? Can't it be read to mean that the DPL may
> > appoint a new Secretary not at end of term, if there's disagreement
> > between them?
>
> I believe this only applies in the cont
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 06:07:25PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> "clear that most people don't work on RC bugs instead of working on their
> packages": I don't have any data on that, it's mostly based on
> perception. Let's try to gather data on something relevant:
>
> Number of distinct posters
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 02:09:03PM +0100, Dionysios Kalofonos wrote:
> during soft freeze any changes can be made as long as no new RC bugs get
> introduced, and during hard freeze is what happens today.
>
Erm, doesn't this happen already?
Neil
--
<@nurn> Paedophile Glitter arrives in UK
<@nur
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 03:01:04PM +0100, Peter Tuhársky wrote:
> Amayita
[snip]
> american social identity problems.
FAIL.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
--
To UN
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:23:03AM -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> I have a feeling that the libwebkit currently in sid and lenny is pretty
> broken, from the looks of this bug.
>
Unfortunately, we don't seem to be able to get much/any response from
the maintainers. It would have been really usef
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:35:54AM -0500, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> So please, let these maintainers choose, rather than ordering them
> about. It is *they* who are in a position to decide whether maintaining
> gnome 1.x is worth it. Of course, it will also be up to them to do the
> maintenanc
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 02:46:25AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> doesn't matter. GCC-4.5 won't be the default for squeeze. if the GCC-4.5
> release is done before the squeeze freeze, then it will be uploaded to
> unstable and enabled to build for architectures where it doesn't show
> regression
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:59:35AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> This is a bug in the netatalk Debian packaging. You cannot assume the
> package will be built in a clean chroot; among other things, the buildd
> software explicitly does not guarantee that all packages will be removed.
>
Would it b
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 02:36:08PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Neil McGovern writes:
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:59:35AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> This is a bug in the netatalk Debian packaging. You cannot assume the
> >> package will be built in a cl
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:32:17PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > Would it be time to start looking at LVM snapshops + sbuild perhaps?
>
> we already have two or three buildds doing that... The buildd team (esp.
> HE) working on that and if it works out to be stable enough, we can see
> if w
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:48:11AM +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Description : advanced Python shell
>
> This Python shell permits to work in a more productive way with Python
> interpreter providing features not yet implemented in standard IDLE.
>
This short and long description need qui
pkg-clamav-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Bcc:
Subject: ClamAV supportability in stable releases
Reply-To:
Hi,
The release team have been asked to remove ClamAV from testing (and
hence the next stable release. See bug #587058.
The issue seems to be that it's not supportable in stable due to the
Hi,
With regards to #554788, is there a chance that this could be fixed, or
even replied to? I really would rather not remove courier from testing.
Neil
--
What is a sane place to look for washing machines around Manchester?
enrico: the canals :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-req
Well, it seems that other people haven't taken an interest in the bug,
and we've now frozen, again.
As there isn't a resolution in sight, I'll add a hint at the end of
August for the removal of the package unless there's significant
progress to fixing the issue.
Neil
--
the hacklab room is the
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 08:47:49PM +0100, Debian Project Secretary - Neil
McGovern wrote:
> In the brackets next to your preferred choice, place a 1. Place a 2 in
> the brackets next to your next choice. You may rank options equally (as
> long as all choices X you make are 1 or 2).
Pl
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 07:20:14PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 02:34 PM, Neil McGovern wrote:
>
> >> Then mail the ballot to: gr_nonpackag...@vote.debian.org.
> >
> > This means it shouldn't be sent to secret...@debian.org. I'm re-attaching
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: cslh
Version : 2.8
Upstream Author : Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.craftysyntax.com/CSLH/
License : GPL
Description : A live support chat system.
Crafty Syntax Live Support (cslh) is a live
nce
> experimental is not a full distribution -- it only contains packages and
> makes only sense with a "normal, codenamed" distro (sid) installed
>
I like it too :)
Prehaps it could be used as a codename for the new unstable when Sarge
is released as stable?
Regards,
Neil
Hi,
I can't seem to find the package that xf86config belongs to, but the bug
is as follows:
xf86config writes to /etc/X11/XF86Config, rather than
/etc/X11/XF86Config-4, which is the one being read.
Anyone know where this bug should be reported to?
Many thanks,
Neil
--
16 Channels in mode 4
I d
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:26:38AM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
> Emile van Bergen wrote:
> > So what do you propose then, to drop everything just because you
> > cynically point out that a lot of rules are being violated today?
> Society evolves and with it rules change, we need
> to accept this and se
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 03:25:42PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
> Neil McGovern wrote:
> > These are all valid points, however, I still don't want to read HTML
> > e-mail in mutt.
> You are figting a losing battle.
Unfortunatly, this may be so, but the latest trend I personally
Hi all,
While trying to upgrade libgd-perl I get the following error:
vivacia:/home/maulkin# apt-get install libgd-perl
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:57:25AM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> 920 cdrom://Lenny_DVD_1 lenny/main Packages
> 900 ftp://ftp2.de.debian.org lenny/main Packages
> 980 http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/main Packages
[...]
> Can someone explain, WHY the SECURITY mirro
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 02:47:04AM +, Noah Slater wrote:
> This has clear advantages for being able to post-process, check, search, and
> navigate copyright information using whatever tools the community decides
> would
> be profitable.
>
I'm not quite clear as to why this is an advantage ye
Hi,
Thanks for bringing this GR. I'd like to propose an amendment:
AMENDMENT START
General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements
to i
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 01:45:18PM +, Noah Slater wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:42:29AM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > I'm not quite clear as to why this is an advantage yet Currently, this
> > seems to have been designed to provide interfaces for future tools t
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:53:02PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> The first GR was passed in June 2003 and there were 804 developers.
> The last GR was passed in November 2008 and there were 1018 developers.
>
Actually, to be fair, the first vote was 1999, with 357 developers.
Neil
--
< vorlon>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:59:34AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> That's a fair question, but AUIU, it is not up to the proposer, having
> already proposed, to decide when the vote gets called.
>
It's up to the proposer or any of the seconders to do so.
Neil
--
hermanr_: I never studied german
I
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:53:58PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> That would be premature. As I understand it, we're waiting on (and I'm
> actively soliciting) input for other purposes of the information in the
> ‘debian/copyright’ file; not least from the legal counsel at SPI.
>
I could be wrong, bu
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:12:04PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> icewm
> linpopup
> wmclockmon
> cheops
> codebreaker
> gaby
> dbmix
> gcrontab
> gbuffy
> gcvs
> gcx
> geg
> gman
> gps
> gqcam
> gtkpool
> libjsw
> i2e
> mah-jong
> mbrowse
> predict
> xemacs21
> swami
> xoscope
> xscorch
>
Al
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 12:49:52AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> So, do I understand well that it's your view that just linking with
> AGPLv3 make it mandatory to re-license using AGPLv3? Is there such a
> clause in the AGPLv3 license?
>
No, it's required to re-licence it to AGPLv3, or an AGPLv3
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:43:15AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Sune Vuorela wrote:
>
> >The way is to put your time/money where your mouth is and provide the
> >code. Asking others to do all the work is not the way forward in OSS.
>
> I highly doubt you can call _me_ someone who does not do w
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 03:15:17PM +0400, vita...@yourcmc.ru wrote:
> I'm not a Debian developer, just a Debian user, and I want to say that I was
> happy to see XFCE being the default DE. Just because it's small, classic and
> neutral DE - which GNOME 3 definitely isn't. I think XFCE is a better
>
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 03:03:05PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Yeah, but Md is an arsehole anyway and requires printf to be
> a /bin/sh builtin instead of just adding /usr/bin to $PATH,
> especially now that the initrd mounts /usr already anyway,
> and CTTE decided to rather offend me than Md b
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 07:56:25AM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> This essentially is a reintroduction of the package "runit-run", which
> was added to Debian end of 2002, and removed on request of the release
> team end of 2010, with the package name changed. Since then, a backward
> compatibility f
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:43:13PM +, devo...@vote.debian.org wrote:
> This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
> Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
> Debian Project Secretary
Whelp, that wasn't meant to happen. Apologies for th
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 05:53:36PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 57dd4d7c-3e92-428f-8ab7-10de5172589e
> [ ] Choice 1: Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system
> [ ] Choice 2: Su
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 04:12:20PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 04:10:13PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 11:53:43PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anyth
November) in proper timing. Did I miss some announcement?
> >
> See the debian-devel archives from mid-Fenruary 2014. According to Neil
> McGovern, the code name shall be "zurg".
>
> >>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/02/msg00905.html
>
> Whil
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 06:12:46PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Neil McGovern writes ("Re: REISSUED CfV: General Resolution: Init system
> coupling"):
> > Indeed, unfortunately so. Given the rather rushed nature though, it
> > would be nice to try and work out a way o
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
