On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:21:30AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote: > Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > >>>If interested people would think a l.d.o list > >>>is better, that could also be nice. > >> > >>Once you've got me convinced the list is a good idea, it usually doesn't > >>take too long to create it. > > It really seems that such a list is needed, a lot of webapp maintainers > would be happy to have a common place to talk about that. > > Moreover, I do think that this list would have a decent lifetime, in the > first place, it will handle the Webapp Policy Writing but it won't > become useless when the policy will be written. > Indeed, I think that it will become the right place to help maintenance > of webapps. > > Here is the name that sounds to be the good one, according to this thread: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > We have to find a correct description for the list, let me give you a > first try: > > Coordination for web application maintenance and Debian Webapp > Policy issues. > > Feel free to give here other descriptions :) >
As per the list creation guidelines, I'll suggest the following, unless anyone can improve on it: Name: debian-webapps Rationale: There are now a large number of Web Application packages in and entering Debian. At the moment, there is no policy on how to package these applications. This list aims to: * Create and maintain a working policy for the packaging of Web based applications (Webapps). * Provide a forum for the discussion of packaging Webapps. Short description: Web Applications package maintainance and Web Application policy development Long description: Coordination for the maintainance of web application packages and Debian Webapp Policy issues. Category: Developers Subscription Policy: open Post Policy: open Web Archive: yes Warm regards, Neil -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
