On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 12:49:52AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > So, do I understand well that it's your view that just linking with > AGPLv3 make it mandatory to re-license using AGPLv3? Is there such a > clause in the AGPLv3 license? >
No, it's required to re-licence it to AGPLv3, or an AGPLv3 compatable licence. See, for example, http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#IfLibraryIsGPL and https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html Neil --
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
