Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:56:52 +0200, Martin Geisler wrote:
>
>> * Do the PHP4 maintainers find PHP5 too buggy for inclusion in
>> Debian?
>
> Yes. Hell, I consider php4 too buggy for Debian. php5 is even
> wors
hoi :)
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 09:42:39PM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> I think the package is ready for a wider audience. I just updated it
> to the just-released upstream version 0.9, it's available here:
why do you patch the Makefile?
does 'make prefix=/usr' not wo
hoi :)
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:45:32PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> Should we change some of these to /usr/libexec?
well, it would be against the FHS, I think.
The BSDs use libexec but I don't really see a good reason why it exists.
--
Martin Waitz
signature.asc
Description:
Should we change some of these to /usr/libexec?
I don't think so. Both FHS 2.1 (referenced by the current Policy) and
FHS 2.3 (the latest FHS version) mandate /usr/lib (or a subdirectory)
for internal binaries.
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
Christian Hammers wrote:
> I could package the whole libsnmp source code into the Quagga file, and
> simply compile it with --without-openssl and then link it statically
> or something similar brute force and ugly.
FWIW: Please don't. This would mean creating a security-support nightmare.
Regar
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> It seems that Red Hat has a lot of programs under /usr/libexec that are
>>> under /usr/lib in Debian. One example is /usr/lib/postfix
>>> vs /usr/libe
ndle that many files/subdirs.
And they are very likely in RAM already.
so, do you have any numbers?
--
Martin Waitz
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hared
libraries and internal executables "different kinds of things." They
are both binaries loaded and executed by a program.
If there is a _technical_ necessity to separate them (like directory
search times), this would be similar to /bin vs /usr/bin, which are
also separate for techn
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> If there is a reason to separate /usr from / (which so many people
>>> think th
f the Debian Melbourne guys have his
phone number. In fact, Russell Coker has organized a meetup on
Saturday so he might be able to ask Jon in person for you there
(assuming that he'll attend, obviously).
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
>
>> Afaik the good, old, slow linear list. With that file open/stat is
>> O(n) and ls also O(n) (cause you keep reading the dir instead of
>> starting at the top each time).
>
> In which case, we do have "that bug".
Would you agree that "that bug" should be fixed (in Etch), irrespective
of whether the FHS is also changed to split /usr/lib?
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rphaned I would happily
volunteer to take over the service if this helps.
bis dahin/kind regards
Martin Mewes
--
Welche Mailingliste zu welchem Linux?
suse-linux@suse.com -> SuSE Linux
debian-user-german@lists.debian.org -> Debian GNU/Linux
linux-k
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.sourceforge.net
Anyone interested?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 03:55:36PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Thanks to base64, I never forward any windows virus to myself, they
> are kept in my ~/mail directory. See my ~/pmrc/executables in master
> for generic anti windows-executable recipes.
I recently found this other source of procmail
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-04 22:29]:
> Brent Fulgham has decided to give some packages away (mostly Erlang
> and Dylan related packages but also some others); the following
> mail is forwarded with permission from debian-private:
anyone interested?
about what to do with cantus and cantus3?
Since you're the maintainer of cantus3 and you suggest it's removal,
can you go ahead and file a bug report on ftp.d.o? Should cantus be
removed too?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-03 14:54]:
> I intend to ask for removal of the following packages in the next
> few days unless someone is willing to step up as maintainer. All of
> these packages have been orphaned for over 60 days and have never
> been part o
quite
cluttered with all the control messages from the BTS.
What do other people think of this? Do you want a shorter WNPP
posting with only new entries on -devel?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe&
ho it's outdated. I'll file a bug report against ftp.d.o.
No, reassign the existing WNPP bug to ftp.d.o.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hich are going to be
removed soon. However, when I make a large removal run (versus just
removing one or two packages), I typically post to d-d-a or -devel to
give people a chance to adopt the packages.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-19 17:43]:
> I agree that this might be a good idea. debian-wnpp is quite
> cluttered with all the control messages from the BTS.
>
> What do other people think of this? Do you want a shorter WNPP
> posting with only new ent
* Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-20 09:55]:
> Throw in a link to the full list for RFA/O/RFH too? Apart from that,
> I'd love to see it on d-d-a.
OK, I'll add links. Note sure about d-d-a or d-d yet. Someone also
suggested an RSS feed.
--
Martin Michlmayr
emovals happening much more frequently and quickly these days, the
downside is that it doesn't give people a chance to complain when
someone is removed within minutes of it being requested.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
t;Something". Just a just typo...
> It's surely possible to put it back if the removal was bad, right?
Yes, of course, and the sources also stay on snapshot.d.net and in the
morgue for a while.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-20 09:55]:
> Throw in a link to the full list for RFA/O/RFH too? Apart from
> that, I'd love to see it on d-d-a.
I've done that now and will send the posting to -devel. I'm not sure
about d-d-a yet but that can easily b
which wasn't the case here.
Actually it's even a third required mistake: For Ubuntu we can only do
source-only uploads, Debian only accepts binary uploads.
Martin
--
Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian Developerhttp://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 06:02:52PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> That's still requiring /manual intervention/, and lying about the true
> state of the bug to the BTS. Ideally the BTS should understand that
> the bug was closed by a particular version of the package (the one
> which had Closes: in
#x27;s their policy and unfortunately it won't
change... however, maybe there's still hope, now that more people are
expressing that they'd like to receive patches and not just links to
patches.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
f authentication fails for
more users this could even be RC.
--
Martin Waitz
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
would be bad in any way? As long as
this remains an offering, I think Debian can benefit from that. And at
no time Ubuntu will be able to force decisions into Debian.
Have a nice day,
Martin
--
Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org
Debian Developerhttp://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-upgrade).
* Sid will be broken for a fair amount of time anyway since there are
more transitions ahead of us (g++ 4.0, dbus, etc.)
This mail already became longer than intended, so if you have any
question, please contact [4] or me personally.
Thanks and have a nice day!
Martin
[1] http:
all, Ubuntu
imports bugs from out BTS, so why shouldn't we do the same? (Of
course, we shouldn't have to, but given current affairs, it appears as
if we had.)
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
'm having a hard time
> thinking of any sensible reasoning.
Not really. The only answer I got was that we should respect that
they're chosing to contribute to Debian "in that way".
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Florian!
Florian Weimer [2005-06-07 19:24 +0200]:
> * Martin Pitt:
>
> > (2) PostgreSQL 8.0 brought a new SONAME for libpq (libpq4), which
> > removed a few symbols which were only intended for internal use,
> > but were used nevertheless by some
Hi!
Andreas Metzler [2005-06-07 20:03 +0200]:
> Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > I will upload the new packages to unstable very soon. This has a
> > reasonably big impact to all packages that depend/build-depend on
> > PostgreSQL since the p
#x27;t create a flood of RC bugs (hopefully).
This seems saner. I don't think it is necessary to flood the BTS if
many people fix their package anyway, so I'll just wait some weeks.
Martin
--
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
Deb
velopment has been for
> quite some time.
and
> I had planned to 'after stable is out'. I'll try to do a maintenance release
> of 2.0.17. If that fails, I can still remove it.
Do you think it should be removed now?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUB
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-12 21:13]:
> Do you think it should be removed now?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/05/msg00089.html lists some
other octave related packages that should probably be removed.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UN
2man to doxygen.
#313264 in dmachinemon
#313265 in libvformat
#313266 in wine
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-mule-canna-wnn
xemacs21-gnome-nomule
xsitecopy
yank
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d
> > coordinate a transition to libglade2 so libglade can eventually be
> > removed?
>
> libglade2 is the GTK2 version of libglade, so it would have to be a
> GTK->GTK2 transition.
And how hard is that? It seems that tons of stuff in the archive
still requires GTK1. I
Stephen Birch wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 05:02 -0500, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Quoting David Weinehall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > > Indeed. The Nokia OSSO (Open Source Software Operations) that work on
> > > this product consists of several DD's (myself being one), plus at least
> > > o
res without
actually gaining anything. So if you want to have that changed, you
really have to convince me that symlinks in /etc are evil and worse
than a config file option.
Thanks and have a nice day,
Martin
--
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu
Hi again,
Martin Pitt [2005-06-14 23:53 +0200]:
> The basic idea of the new cluster system was to have the complete
> information about a cluster's files in
> /etc/postgresql//. That includes the location of the
> log files and the data directory, which are configured using th
...]
}
As I said, I only regard the symlink target as configuration value, I
don't actually pretend that the actual log file is in /etc.
Martin
--
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
round for what? Against the problems with modern C/C++ code?
> Do you really need to remove it if it's a working code?
The tool is neither maintained nor supports modern programs, so I'm
not sure it's a great idea to keep it in the archive... Manoj wanted
to remove it in October
l
> available and it works quite well.
> If all else fails, I might re-think adopting it.
Andreas Tille expressed interest in this package and I find the
description quite interesting too. Does anyone know if there's a
suitable replacement which is still maintained?
--
Martin Mich
ear immediately (and maybe should
also stay in etch, see Murray Cumming's comment in #279392 about 3rd
parties), I'm wondering whether the GNOME/GTK team is willing to adopt
libglade and do some low-level maintenance.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
GPL but this
hasn't happened yet. It can always be re-uploaded once it's GPL.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Clemens Schwaighofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-21 14:44]:
> Are there any kind of documents describing how to move from raidtools
> safely to mdadm without loosing a raid?
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#s-mdadm
--
Martin Mi
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 07:16:22PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> On 2 of the systems I have upgraded, I had serious problems with
> mdadm.
>
> The documentation said that there was no need for a config file, and I
> never used a 2.2 kernel, so the paragraphs starting with "If your RAID
> array was cr
org will contain an archive. It's just on a different
machine so one needs to wait until mirroring has been done.
Regards,
Joey
--
/ Martin Schulze * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * 26129 Oldenburg /
/ Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only /
/ proved it cor
On Tue, Mar 10, 1998 at 07:40:46PM -, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Martin Schulze writes:
> > www.debian.org will contain an archive.
>
> Okay, just wanted to see if there were any archives before I asked a
> stupid question. There aren't, so here I stupid away:
I don&#
html .
Regards,
Joey
--
/ Martin Schulze * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * 26129 Oldenburg /
/ Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only /
/ proved it correct, not tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth /
pgpBpiMfiLdPk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am pleased to announce the availability of my new (English) book
> "The Debian System",
Congratulations, I'll order a copy soon! :)
> The hardcover edition will be available in stores in the beginning
> of July. A
#x27;t want to accept that.
You've done a great job in maintaining firefox, please don't
rename your package based on some personal differences with the
mozilla trademark policy.
--
Martin Waitz
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
d to it.
this should all "just work".
if you provide a pointer to the source package in question we can
have a look at the problem.
--
Martin Waitz
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 12:31:23AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> > please excuse this blatant cross-posting, i wouldn't do it if i didn't
> > think it were critical that i do so...
>
> > http://www.infodrom.org/~joey/log/?200506142140
>
> > say it isn't so!
>
> It isn't so.
the workshop on open source engineering are
available at http://opensource.ucc.ie/
Some researchers are quite new to free software and are only starting
to understand how everything works, but others do good work - work
from which the community can benefit.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com
than people using the standard KDE editor, defaulting to the
latter without bothering the admin seems a good choice IMHO.
Have a nice day,
Martin
--
Martin Pitthttp://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com
Debian Developer http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
De
. It does make sense on complicated server
packages which should run out of the box, but changing the user
interface of a graphical editor is neither complicated, nor is it
necessary to make the package work.
Martin
--
Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer http://w
On 7/2/05, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-01 23:34]:
> > > and we are doing a sociological survey on Debian in order to
> > > better understand the Debian community.
> >
> > didn't tbm do s
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-16 18:18]:
> There are currently over 200 orphaned packages, many of which have
> been on WNPP for quite a long time and some with RC bugs. I intend to
> request the removal of a number of packages in three weeks unless a
> packag
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> I have been corresponding with the developer and maintainer of httperf
> [0], which I intend to adopt. The issue was that a libssl linking
> exception was needed for the package. They are currently making
> inquiries at HP as to how exaclty go about this from their end
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: trafshow
Version : 5.2.3
Upstream Author : Vladimir VorobyevName
* URL : ftp://ftp.nsk.su/pub/RinetSoft/
* License : Free software (See below)
Descr
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the apt-show-versions package.
The package description is:
apt-show-versions parses the dpkg status file and the APT lists for
the installed and available package versions and distribution and
shows upgrade options within th
o), there are plenty of problems. As a starter, the
Cavium people haven't actually published kernel patches for inclusion
in mainline...
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
://wiki.debian.org/BSP2006Vienna
yours Martin
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux - The Universal Operation System
-!- mode/#debian.de [+v Aquariophile] by ChanServ
<+Aquariophile> nun steh ich ganz oben in der Liste :)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ld be possible. I run amd64
with linux32 installed and a 32bit dchroot for stuff like flash and co.
yours Martin
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux - The Universal Operating System
Nene, sie mag keine Horrofilme.. Schnulzen fallen da mit drunter :))
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
rap from backports.org even on debian
sarge systems.
> I think I'm going to take the easy way out and install a minimal dapper
> 64 in a small partition and use that to build amd64 binaries.
If you look for support of ubuntu you have come to the wrong place.
http://www.ubuntu.com/sup
unds the package up.
You don't run a lot of servers if you want to update them more
frequently.
yours Martin
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux - The Universal Operating System
lol, mein feuermelder ist dausicher
im batteriefach unter der batterie steht
"WARNUNG: B
* Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-28 12:35]:
> You don't run a lot of servers either if you never need versions of many
> different packages more recent than a couple of years.
That's when backports and chroots comes in.
yours Martin
--
<[EMAIL PRO
John Goerzen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:09:54PM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> > ciol wrote:
> > > The problem is that Debian doesn't speak a lot about nice features like
> > > volatile and backports, for instance in the official web site, where it's
> > > difficult to see the links.
> >
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mpop
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Martin Lambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://mpop.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Descrip
ow, try thinking about how many of the blocks which are not listed
> as depending on udev actually do.
I can't think of a single one that would not work with good old static
dev tough udev might be the recommended way.
yours Martin
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux - The Unive
sted
> > > as depending on udev actually do.
> > None, because udev isn't actually a hard dependency for any of those
> > scripts, so listing it as such is wrong.
> If it's in the picture then it's relevante.
Then the picture/scripts should be fixed.
yours Mar
thing today...
cheers,
martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A number of packages (at least three, but possibly more) fail to build
with the error:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lraw1394
Can someone investigate why this is the case. I've put built logs
(mbox file) at http://people.debian.org/~tbm/logs/1394.bz2
Thanks.
--
Martin Michlmayr
* Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-31 07:55]:
> Still open:
> > * kforth
> > (new Upstream)
Can you please file an O: bug?
> Taken:
> >
> > * festival, speech-tools
> Franz Pletz
Franz, when will you upload?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.
s on it. Bart, is that still needed?
> Likewise, guppi is a QA-maintained package with no reverse-deps aside from
> gnucash
I'll request it's removal.
> and several other chains of packages also look like we should
> consider removing them once the above-mentioned packag
* Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-16 20:20]:
> etch requires a 2.6 kernel too.
No. Debian won't provide a 2.4 kernel for etch but it works fine with
self built ones.
yours Martin
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux - The Universal Operating S
ar/lock on low memory
systems (which run 2.4 for the smaller memory footprint) so I can still
change it without manual intervention.
yours Martin
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux - The Universal Operating System
oh oh, can i get we.are.the.knights.who.say.ni ?
.no
--
To UNS
lications not supposed to include any headers below
/usr/include/asm or is this a problem with the header files?
In any case, what MaxDB seems to try to do, is to use get_cycles() from
for its internal timers. Is this a problem, and has it
been working for upstream just by accident, or is this ok a
es
*/
#ifdef __KERNEL__
#define BITS_PER_LONG 64
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
The same is true for the macro DECLARE_BITMAP which is used in cpumask.h
and defined in linux/types.h.
So this brings me back to me original problem: are user-space
applications allowed/supposed to use these headers? A
derbird when it was
installed and as I don't see a need for it I keep it purged on all of my
systems.
HTH Martin
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux - The Universal Operating System
Tuvok schrieb:
> wo genau soll es im böhmischen Prater einen Maulbeerbaum geben?
Die Wurze
Someone is interested in donating some older IDE hard disks with about
15-20 GB. They are located in the States and might be useful for
testing to someone working on the debian-installer. If you are
interested, please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com
the targeted policy; so the worst case scenario is that the
> there would be lots of log messages if someone "accidentally" turned
> on SELinux.
>
> I think we are ready. And shipping SELinux by default would
> be a positive thing, in these days of acceler
Oleksandr Moskalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> According to the chapter 3.3 of the Dev. reference the GR calls for votes
> should've been sent to the debian-devel-announce, but in reality they weren't.
> It seems that the only way to get those would be to subscribe to debian-vote
> or to trawl
A number of packages currently fail to build with:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lglib-2.0
Can someone please investigate whether this is a bug in those packages
or some underlying problem and file bugs. I've put some buid logs at
http://people.debian.org/~tbm/logs/glib.bz2
--
Martin Mich
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martin Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pyecm
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Martin Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/pyecm/
* License : GPL
Programming
* Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-18 12:35]:
> - I think there used to be a list of companies that provide Debian
> support and training, but I can't find it - can somebody help?
http://www.debian.org/consultants/
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To U
* Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-18 13:03]:
> > Did you mean this list?
> > http://www.us.debian.org/consultants/
>
> Yes - yow do I get to it from the main page?
debian.org -> Support -> Consultants -> Consultants
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www
re a number of architectures that still need
LinuxThreads.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 11:48]:
> > Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch?
> libc6 is frozen (at 2.3.x -- I assume you mean 2.4, not 2.5?), so no.
2.5 came out a few days ago.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyriu
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:54:02PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
>
> > cat /the/best/dictionary >> /etc/dictionaries-common/words
>
> I don't see the reason why /etc/dictionaries-common/words should be
> a symlink either. The right way to solve this would be to use
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martin Lohmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: php-auth-sasl
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Anish Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pear.php.net/packa
proposal: I propose to write and maintain a set
of configuration files for the current fvwm that cause fvwm to look
and behave the way fvwm95 does now under a C locale. The fvwm95
package will be transitioned to this new package.
Now, what do people think of this idea?
--
Daniel Martin <[EMAIL
e, don't hesitate to get in contact.
References
[1] http://www.linux-mips.org/wiki/Cobalt
[2] http://www.cyrius.com/debian/cobalt/
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.debs for amd64 are
available at http://home.arcor.de/martin.kittel/
Many thanks in advance,
Martin.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
401 - 500 of 2771 matches
Mail list logo
