In #232777, Dirk Eddelbuettel and I had a discussion about octave2.0. Dirk wrote: > We should consider removing octave2.0 as well. It is old code [1], and > upstream decided years ago to not port this code branch, but to concentrate > on octave2.1 instead -- and octave2.1 is where all development has been for > quite some time. and > I had planned to 'after stable is out'. I'll try to do a maintenance release > of 2.0.17. If that fails, I can still remove it.
Do you think it should be removed now? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
