* Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-16 08:20]: > > Srivastava pointed out that, "c2man has been dead upstream for years > > (which was, so far, not a problem), and does not work with modern > > C/C++ programs -- which _is_ a problem. The functionality has been > > superseded with packages like doxygen". He wanted to remove c2man > > back then (October 2003) but couldn't because some (but few) programs > > still used it. > > Hmm.. there is a way to work around it, and I've been using the > workaround.
A workaround for what? Against the problems with modern C/C++ code? > Do you really need to remove it if it's a working code? The tool is neither maintained nor supports modern programs, so I'm not sure it's a great idea to keep it in the archive... Manoj wanted to remove it in October 2003... so it's not as if the situation is getting any better. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
