change environment variables? If it is little used maybe it
isn't worth the effort in supporting.
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Brian May]
How many dhclient scripts actually make use of this "feature" of
being able to change environment variables? If it is little used
maybe it isn't worth the effort in supporting.
That is exactly the question Martin asked as he opened th
333 2007-10-24 00:37 _dhcdbd
At a quick glance none of these appear to change any environment
variables. They are read-only operations only.
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
told to do it manually. Otherwise the risk exists the modifications
might break something.
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T (File exists)
So, ok, this means the process can't continue any more (denial of
service attack), and if the process does continue this is a problem,
otherwise I can't see how this would bring the entire system down.
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
pgrade". This system had no problems. Normally I just do an
"apt-get dist-upgrade".
Unfortunately I was in a hurry to get the systems up and running (my
time is rather constrained) so didn't investigate in detail required to
file a quality bug report. I should still have t
shell so I can use the following:
[1] 'apt-cache policy ' essentially already does ordering
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mlink.
In any case, doing something better would be good because it means an
attacker can't run a denial-of-service type attack and prevent the
script from running.
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henning Glawe wrote:
you are right... sorry for the sloppy research :S... think it must have been
the perl-base<->perl-modules version mismatch. I'll try to reproduce this
immediately.
Yes, I think this is the issue.
I wrote an ugly script to reproduce from a almost pristine etch chroot[1]
might be the reason it was rejected.
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As a maintainer I would like to know when a package fails to build for
any reason, even if it is due to factors outside my control.
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
any requirement that says the source code must be editable in a
sane manner (e.g. editing a PDF file with a binary hex editor would not
be sane) with entirely DFSG compliant tools?
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ally endorsed if the manufacturer ensures users can't
change it - e.g. firmware for wireless interfaces.
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: "We want to able to to use
your product with Debian out of the box", which swings them towards the
"easier" option A (closed firmware distributed on ROM), not option C
(open firmware with source).
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
, but an excuse by the manufacturers (there seems
to be some disagreement here), we still aren't going to get the
manufacturers to change their mind by discussing how silly it is here,
or by encouraging people to buy hardware with the firmware on ROM.
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Miriam Ruiz wrote:
I'm not exactly sure that I like the new name, to be honest.
I saw the name and initially thought it was related to blender.
http://www.blender.org/
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
best approach would be to
rebuild the security update with the correct tar ball.
Otherwise, if the changes to the tar ball where deliberate, change the
filename as above.
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
n would be to vote for (C) first, and then decide the
wording on (A) and (B) depending on the outcome of (C). In which case,
even if there is a conflict, the wording can clarify if the second vote
overrides or doesn't override the first result.
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRI
... yes
checking for compress in -lz... yes
Error
Sorry, this version of CDK can not handle empty lists.
You must downgrade to a version older than cdk-4.9.11-20031210
=== cut ===
Hopefully there is a solution to this issue...
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Solution?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
at MIT Kerberos has named their library:
/usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2
Wouldn't this be a better solution then getting rid of the UMich
library?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ou could implement other
protocols in GSSAPI too.
Having said that, the only GSSAPI libraries in Debian I know of are
the two Kerberos libraries.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e the library that would be OK
though.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rs must be closed before calling
setsid. For this reason, normal redirection doesn't work with detach,
so explicit support for redirection has been added. detach also
contains an option for writing the pid of the detached process to a
file.
=== cut ===
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTEC
t instead of adding
Colin> yet another program.
The website gave me the impression both programs are the same, except
for the name.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unlike qcmu, it deals correctly
with passing on a SIGINT sent to it. Needs ssh for operation over the net.
detachtty looks closer to screen then detach/nohup/setsid.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
osition 4
Hagit> Does anyone knows why this could be?
I would assume that this is "normal" noise because the files normally
should be read-only, and the messages are not related to the crashes.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> "Raphael" == Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raphael> Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Raphael> dar-static
Raphael> Theodore Y. Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Raphael> e2fsck-static
Both of these (and maybe
bypassing the libc resolver.
I wouldn't use ".local" as that seems to be treated as a special case by
zeroconf enabled computers, and various OS seem to have zeroconf enabled by
default (like it or not).
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists
ptus-simple-cluster, print-server,
kubuntu-desktop, kubuntu-netbook, edubuntu-desktop, xubuntu-desktop,
mobile-mid, ubuntu-netbook-remix
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
is not yet available on all
modern computers.
Thanks.
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:47:54PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Brian May wrote:
>
> > 1) I believe Xen, with paravirtualization (that is without QEMU) is more
> > secure
> > then KVM (or Xen) with QEMU.
>
> I haven't heard
tualisation
extensions.
Like I said previously, I think dropping Xen support is a mistake because KVM
requires QEMU and QEMU seems to have a reputation of being insecure.
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
ely it is just a matter of binding to IPv4 and ignoring the error that
occurs when trying to bind to the IPv6 socket (or vice versa if IPv6 is
supported but not IPv4)?
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 04:55:27PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 01:21:55AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I believe we will have Xen hypervisor and Linux dom0 packages, but they
> >
27;t going to be Xen support, or limited Xen support maybe,
because upstream were slow to update from 2.6.18.
Fortunately Lenny did get Xen support, and for 2.6.26.
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
d be available shortly after Jeremy gets back from
> his vacation.
What chance does this have of making it in time for Squeeze?
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tion and full-virtualization. Mostly used
> on servers. Will be abandoned after squeeze."
This doesn't help answer your questions (which I am interested in
knowing the answers too), however there is also lxc - Linux Containers
which may be another solution for some problems. It is no
ack to using openssl, at least
with libraries such as openldap that are commonly used in pam and nss
modules?
Or is there another way?
Alternatively, have I got something wrong?
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
appears to have gone to unstable instead of experimental.
Is this because I used sbuild to build the package against a sid chroot?
How do I fix this mess up?
Thanks
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
tion-$arch or $distribution that exists.
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/3c5cf5261003181910w7d4bd396p7b629da95e292...@mail.gmail.com
On 19 March 2010 13:24, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> | k...@bowmore:/tmp$ sbuild -c sid-amd64-sbuild -d experimental
> gtk2-engines_2.18.5-2.dsc
What happens if you omit the -d and only have -c?
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
archive that do link against openssl. Not to mention
applications that use both PAM and openssl - there are GPLed PAM
modules in our archive too. I hope I haven't started a witch hunt...
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
disabled
Cgroup cpuset: enabled
--- Misc ---
Veth pair device: enabled
Macvlan: enabled
Vlan: enabled
File capabilities: enabled
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
es, if the requirement is to be able to create files in certain
directories with group permissions (I think that is what this is
about, but only skimming), can't you do something with default ACLs
that do the same thing on given directories without the extra
complexity to the groups?
Or have
ng about brokenness of HTTP pipelining here... Did
I miss something?
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktincd4paqge1xzpwxwn3ilenm1fzanva4qyg5...@mail.gmail.com
tions work without change. Although all these arguments have
been hashed out before, no point to repeat them.
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://list
e be
mangling the IPv4 address into a IPv6 address.
Where as you seem to be saying a server can create a socket that will
work with any protocol and is in no way specific to IPv4 or IPv6.
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject o
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Brian May
* Package name: django-ajax-selects
Version : 1.1.4
Upstream Author : Chris Sattinger
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/django-ajax-selects/
* License : Dual licensed under the MIT and GPL licenses
Programming
ay not really be broken.
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikxz9gtm2pn_lgorphfd-ggapvp3busioccj...@mail.gmail.com
m address is valid... To be fair,
it does print it out, but sometimes I get it wrong all the same.
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.deb
last point (above) may seem cosmetic, however this is a discussion
on getting more Debian users, and may be an important reason people
avoid Debian.
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...
On 26 July 2010 21:49, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Brian May writes ("Re: How to make Debian more attractive for users, was: Re:
> The number of popcon.debian.org-submissions is falling"):
>> I would really like to see a HTML/HTTP browser based interface for the
>> BTS. I w
we don't just do it.
br...@andean:~$ i="cat's meow.tar.gz"
br...@andean:~$ echo "`basename "$i" .tar.gz`"
cat's meow
(yes, the nested quotes don't seem to matter)
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.de
to be used anywhere. So
I am not sure why this is needed.
On the other hand, so what if it calls apt-cache policy - does that
matter? Maybe apt-cache policy is broken on Mike's system?
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
> solving this undermaintenance problem.
Do we really need two solutions for what appears to be the same
problem? Seems like it might be better to merge them or remove one.
Especially if one is under-maintained. This is one case I don't see
any advantage having two independent implementations.
getting the user to file the report upstream and
having the Debian maintainer act as the relay for all messages.
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http:
stable. So users are
forced to install the non-security updated version to work around
this.
Thanks.
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://list
most of the hard work has already been done.
> Note that for openbve, a "Request for Package" has already been filed:
> <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=522854>
> so at least one other person was interested in getting a package at some
> time.
d=harry:cpm, but that looks
seriously old, e.g. it refers to Sarge and Woody.
--
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktim
w-data read-only access to the
files, but anyone in the group can write to the files.
That way, if anybody compromises apache, the most an attacker
could do is read any web file, but not write to them.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 05:01:31PM +0200, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote:
> IIRC maximum number is limited to 32 groups for a single user. Just in
> case you are going to add more :)
What happens if you exceed this limit?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Debbugs-CC:" BTS header.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
can emerge with out being obvious,
for instance if a package detects an extra library
is installed on the maintainers machine and automatically uses it
without the maintainer being aware of what is happening
(this happened with early versions of Heimdal and libhesiod0 in fact).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
o on platform Y, so it doesn't get tested on other
platforms.
2. The package may be broken in that it is inconsistant,
but still work fine, or work fine for most features.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ob.
- Maybe even asked around find out potential problems that could occur
and what to do if if this happened at new job.
There are probably other things he could have done, thats all I can
think of right now.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
testing | mips, mipsel
libc6 |2.3.2-7 | unstable | mips
libc6 |2.3.2-9 | testing | arm, hppa, i386, m68k, powerpc, s390,
sparc
libc6 | 2.3.2.ds1-8 | unstable | arm, m68k
libc6 | 2.3.2.ds1-9 | unstable | hppa, i386, mipsel, powerpc, s390,
sparc
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t by its proper name (if we refer to Linux, that is).
apt-get source kernel-source-2.4.22
???
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ly on
> you, no matter what the other person has done.
Perhaps English is not his native language, and he didn't realize
how harsh his wording was?
Anyway, on the given topic, are "reverse-suggests" possible?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
arked as broken in aptitude when selecting
kde)
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
; a fully correct lilo.conf by itself? Besides the text is wrong instead
> of "initrd=initrd.img" it should be "initrd=/initrd.img".
...because you might be using grub and not lilo?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
;
> We want screenshots!
I have tried debian-installer, and found it to be great!
I just have three feature requests, if they aren't already
supported:
1. Linux 2.6.0?
2. Grub instead of Lilo?
3. Software raid support?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
NMU, but still no response.
I went to do the NMU, but instead get a unrelated (and unreported)
FTBS error.
(SCSI_DISK_MAJOR undeclared in misc/util.c:116).
What are my options now?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 01:51:31AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> That's true. It can be any string. The fact that it just happens to
> look like an HTTP url and DTD is actually at that URL is not part of the
> standard, AFAIK.
Errr, we are not getting confused??
An example is:
http://www.oasis-open.or
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 06:46:11AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 09:53:48AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > You can find copies of the source code at
> > http://www.microcomaustralia.com.au/debian/experimental>.
>
> the sources are broken, run autor
d be caused by a non-release
critical bug in another package.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 01:46:02PM +, Mark Howard wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 06:56:13PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > A release critical bug in one package could be caused by a non-release
> > critical bug in another package.
>
> How?
> If the bug is caused by a pr
> > pre-release kernels.
>
> Yes but also the debian servers would not have been vulnerable if they had
> used 2.4.23. At least not at that point in time.
Just because Debian doesn't have a time machine...
There is simply no excuse!
;-)
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
so I can't test this...
Hmmm... Wonder if this is a local problem with my Internet connection or
a problem with the remote system... Probably a local problem.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: server said: Permission denied.
What are my options now?
PS. Please CC me as per the Mail-Followups-To header, as I can't read
debian-devel mail until I get login access to gluck again.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
y scanning all harddisks on all busses to find RAID devices.
So yes, maybe initrd/initramfs is the way of the future (I have read
proposals that would make loading modules in an initramfs compulsory for
all systems), but I think there are still a few issues that need to be
resolved first.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ut when I asked the initrd maintainer I was given a good reason
why it was not used (sorry; I can't remember what this was now; it might
simply be that the mdadm code is unreliable, inefficient, or buggy).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ted packages.
Any better ideas?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 10:58:53AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> Otherwise, there is no way to filter out this bug report in BTS
> listings.
Not to mention the problem that if -1 is closed, XX needs to be
manually too, but the "owner" of XX is not informed that -1
has be
n my mind
> today is the ability to check the NEW queue.
Is it still possible to run madison to check what versions of a specific
packages are available?
I am gussing this isn't possible, but I found it very useful.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
00, pR: 180.54
I also used bogofilter, but crm114 was suppose to be better. I might
go back to bogofilter sometime...
My computer CPU is AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1800+
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ng postfix to bounce valid emails.
Jesus> Indeed the latest version of CRM114 managed to eat my CPU,
Jesus> but i downgraded to the previous one and everything went
Jesus> back to more than fine.
What version did you downgrade to?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ely including a
Thomas> new upstream release is not good enough.
The tradeoff here, is that the maintainer/whoever in doing the
back-porting might make mistakes, causing unnoticed breakage, or not
port all security fixes (especially if code was rewritten upstream).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
.
I could mark the bug as forwarded upstream to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]",
where n is the real bug report, but it isn't really upstream...
Also a method of automatically finding out when bug n is closed, so I
can close my bug report would be nice, too.
Is anything like this possibl
ht miss the second title (unless I knew A
was linked against libb).
When bug report 2 is closed, the maintainer of A may want to double
check to make sure that the bug really is fixed in A (maybe bug 2
wasn't the real cause after all), before 1 gets closed.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
eported against, ...) are the same.
Martin> Just for the record, tags are an exception. They are
Martin> merged when you merge bugs.
What happens to the tags if the two reports are split apart again? Are
their original values restored, or do they keep their new values?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> "Bernd" == Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bernd> On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 05:54:44PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
>> I could just close the bug against my package, but this means other
>> people will encounter the same proble
py of the
package when bugs in other packages are fixed.
It also will only work if you use reportbug. If you are just browsing
the BTS via HTTP to find a solution to your problem, you may not find
anything.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Adrian> Reading the rest of the thread, I conclude that adding an
Adrian> explanation to the bug and tagging it wontfix is probably
Adrian> the best solution.
You could be right here.
You won't get informed if the bug is closed though, and the wontfix
status may imply you don't want to fix the bug.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
in> repository.
You mean via HTTP? This would be possible to add, I think. I guess it
hasn't been considered a priority.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
e related, but
not the same.
>>>>> "Colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Colin> If you like, you can reassign both bugs to "foo,bar" and
Colin> merge them.
Only if the two bugs are exactly the same.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
. Other solutions/workarounds may also be
possible. Closing y means x is probably fixed
but needs testing.
If more thought was put into this, I am sure we could come up with
something better.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ange. I have never had any problems with debootstrap and apt-proxy
myself (unless it was because the server was down or something at the
time).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
d no doubt if I kept my
testing systems up to date with testing, this would vanish in several
days time.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
modules at boot time
Petter> are welcome. :)
Edit /etc/discover.conf and delete the appropriate lines (discover
2.0.4-5).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
401 - 500 of 878 matches
Mail list logo
