On 21 March 2010 06:59, Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > Applications that use NSS/PAM, and individual NSS/PAM modules, are > useful without the other and it is a matter of user configuration > whether they are used together at all. The OpenLDAP modules are not > used by default. So I don't see that copyleft licences of applications > using NSS/PAM can possibly extend to them.
Yes, that is my understanding of how Debian has made decisions too. I should be able to dig up references if required. Also I do note that there are a number of PAM modules currently in the Debian archive that do link against openssl. Not to mention applications that use both PAM and openssl - there are GPLed PAM modules in our archive too. I hope I haven't started a witch hunt... -- Brian May <br...@microcomaustralia.com.au> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3c5cf5261003201844v271807eex611eef23dafd5...@mail.gmail.com
