Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
If the tarball has changed then how about a 7:2007b~dfsg2-<whatever>?
That way the filename will differ and no conflict will arise.
I am a bit surprised that a security update requires modifications to
the upstream tar ball.
I would speculate this was a mistake, and the best approach would be to
rebuild the security update with the correct tar ball.
Otherwise, if the changes to the tar ball where deliberate, change the
filename as above.
--
Brian May <br...@microcomaustralia.com.au>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
