The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 303 (new: 25)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 85 (new: 3)
Total number of packages request
Hi Daniel,
> Hi everyone,
>
> I tried patching cplay to use mplayer(>=1.0pre7) which can also do
> speed-control on audio-files. My patch creates and uses a fifo to control
> mplayer and adds some keybindings to cplay (decr: [, incr: ], reset: =).
>
> I tried to write the patch as clean and stab
Hi,
It's nice that people spend extra time in taking care of the packages
of others, for example when they upload a NMU to fix serious or
important issues, however this is not always desired or required
immediately.
I suppose some people think the green flag has been waved for NMUin
Le ven 23 juin 2006 16:33, Loïc Minier a écrit :
> PS: DELAYED is fine, even if that might mean that the work might be
> made twice, once by the NMUer, and once by the maintainer.
delayed upload means that the NMUer sent his patch to the bug report,
and then the maintainer can start from that to
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 04:33:50PM +0200, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's nice that people spend extra time in taking care of the packages
> of others, for example when they upload a NMU to fix serious or
> important issues, however this is not always desired or re
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> delayed upload means that the NMUer sent his patch to the bug report,
> and then the maintainer can start from that to do his work. so it's
> basically *not* doing the work twice :)
delayed upload means the NMUer lost the time to prepare the NMU ev
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 04:33:50PM +0200, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Probably the biggest reason why I feel this extra time would be useful
> > is because the new Python Policy and the tools supporting it saw
> > non-negligible changes
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 06:43:57PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 04:33:50PM +0200, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Probably the biggest reason why I feel this extra time would be useful
> >
Dear Debian Developers,
I've been pleased to summarize some ideas for the general public.
More details and sources can be found at the end of this mail.
I'm not subscribed to all lists, so please CC any replies to me.
--
I p
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 18:43 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Yes:
> http://www.ouaza.com/wordpress/2006/06/23/the-python-transition-can-continue/
>
> I wonder if I should make a second announce on -devel-announce just to
> make it clear to everybody.
At the lease I would appreciate (as a python ap
10 matches
Mail list logo
