On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 06:43:57PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 04:33:50PM +0200, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > Probably the biggest reason why I feel this extra time would be useful > > > is because the new Python Policy and the tools supporting it saw > > > non-negligible changes in the last days. All of this only settled very > > > recently. This explains why maintainers have been reluctant in moving > > > packages to the new policy immediately. > > > > > > (This is not a call against properly done NMUs in general, but a > > > specific call to postpone NMUs concerning the Python Policy by a few > > > days because the situation just stabilized.) > > > > Is it actually stabilized ? > > Yes: > http://www.ouaza.com/wordpress/2006/06/23/the-python-transition-can-continue/ > > I wonder if I should make a second announce on -devel-announce just to > make it clear to everybody.
I think it'd be better. With a statement about NMUs, it would be even better. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
