Hi!
You wrote:
> * videogen
> (easy pickings)
If no one else is interested, I'd like to take this one.
It could take me a few weeks to find time to upload though, as Real Life
is getting in the way atm.
--
Kind regards,
++
On 29 May 2006, at 23:53, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Em Seg, 2006-05-29 às 22:08 +0100, Chris Boot escreveu:
SLIND sounds interesting indeed, I've been using a buildroot-built
system for mine so it was difficult getting dpkg built in the first
place, but I've got it mostly all going. All the arch-inde
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:47:53PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Or just dump all packages into the buildds queue file (as
>
> That would be ~buildd/build/REDO
>
>> package_version, one per line) and start it.
>
> That would be
>
> package_vers
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hendrik Sattler wrote:
>> Am Montag, 29. Mai 2006 21:16 schrieb Thomas Viehmann:
>>> Hendrik Sattler wrote:
No, but you could manually set all stuff in Depends to the needed
versions. That would also work for the buildds, I guess.
>>> And bre
On 30 May 2006, at 08:53, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
On 5/30/06, Chris Boot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 29 May 2006, at 23:53, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Yes, I can see that could be handy. I'm guessing SLIND is based on
woody?
No, it is based on testing/unstable. Host part is mostly sarge (it was
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:00:21AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> binNMU & recompilation: won't break if the app really works with this
> >> older
> >> version and the lib must be ABI-compatible anyway.
> > ... and this one is plainly wrong. binNMUs for rebuild against
> > dependency lib
Hi,
Andreas Fester schrieb:
I create a new package with the new name which will
get uploaded to the NEW queue. This package replaces the
old package and conflicts with the old package:
Replaces: oldPackage
Conflicts: oldPackage (<< firstVersionOfNewPackage)
IIRC the correct way to do that is
Hi,
* NTP server
(some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian
NTP Team, which consists of zero active members)
I'll take it.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 30 May 2006, at 09:12, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
On 5/30/06, Chris Boot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just make a list of everything you have installed and rebuild each
package one-by-one until you've covered everything. I can't see where
the problem is.
In the real world (tm) building things
On 5/30/06, Chris Boot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 29 May 2006, at 23:53, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Yes, I can see that could be handy. I'm guessing SLIND is based on
woody?
No, it is based on testing/unstable. Host part is mostly sarge (it was
in the 0.1 prerelease, now most of it is sid).
Well i
On 5/30/06, Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What I do think it would be really nice is to have a "contrib-builds"
SLIND repository (like backports do). This would make things easier for
sharing this effort.
Will be there Real Soon Now (tm). Hardware is already at the desk, I
just need t
On 5/30/06, Chris Boot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just make a list of everything you have installed and rebuild each
package one-by-one until you've covered everything. I can't see where
the problem is.
In the real world (tm) building things by hand is not acceptable because of
a) complicated bu
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:23:44AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Andreas Fester schrieb:
> >I create a new package with the new name which will
> >get uploaded to the NEW queue. This package replaces the
> >old package and conflicts with the old package:
> >Replaces: oldPackage
> >Conflicts: oldP
On 5/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am sorry (and not happy with myself) that I've been procrastinating
about this for too long. This decision has not been easy. However,
I need to focus more on (a) work that actually feeds my kids, and
(b) time that is *not* spent hacking.
Morning...
Matthias, your "From:" line appears to be missing. Or my MUA is b0rked.
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:29:34PM +0200, wrote:
> * NTP server
> (some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian
> NTP Team, which consists of zero active members)
I'd take my chance on t
On 5/30/06, Chris Boot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Of course, but I'm just talking about getting a basic environment set
up from scratch. I realise slind removes the need for that now, but...
I'm not insisting on you using slind, I just want to convince people
to contribute to it. :)
--
I am fr
[Benjamin Seidenberg]
> FYI:
> 12:33 < Ganneff> and for all those impatient waiting for NEW: i will
> clear that in my jetlag time, in those nights i
> cant sleep (ie 1st -> 2nd june, 2-> 3) :)
Sounds good, but do not really addresses the fundamental problem here
Hi,
Steve Langasek schrieb:
Package: oldpkg
Depends: newpkg
Description: transitional dummy package
Package: newpkg
Replaces: oldpkg
Conflicts: oldpkg
Description: ...
*NO* *NO* *NO* *NO* *NO*. Look closely at the package relationships you've
specified. Why would you upload a package to
Hi,
Christoph Haas schrieb:
* NTP server
(some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian
NTP Team, which consists of zero active members)
I'd take my chance on this one. There is a large number of bugs open and
I believe that this package is very important. Still I'd li
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:25:58AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Christoph Haas schrieb:
>
> >>* NTP server
> >> (some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian
> >> NTP Team, which consists of zero active members)
>
> >I'd take my chance on this one. There is a large number o
Hi
On Tue, 30 May 2006 11:22:51 +0200
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Steve Langasek schrieb:
>
> >>Package: oldpkg
> >>Depends: newpkg
> >>Description: transitional dummy package
> >
> >>Package: newpkg
> >>Replaces: oldpkg
> >>Conflicts: oldpkg
> >>Description: ...
>
> >
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Andreas Fester schrieb:
>
>> I create a new package with the new name which will
>> get uploaded to the NEW queue. This package replaces the
>> old package and conflicts with the old package:
>> Replaces: oldPackage
>> Conflicts: oldPackage (<< f
Hi!
Sorry for late response.
* "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-24 12:10]:
>> However, contrary to what the NM templates suggest, symbol versioning
>> is not a cure-all for all ABI incompatibilities. If libetpan returns
>> a DB_ENV * in its API, you need to port[1] a
> Have fun with updating the library, it won't affect depending packages.
> :) Some times are that easy to solve, you know?
Ok, will upload today :)
pgpHAIvddyz9K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
> Perhaps my just-posted message has too many words to see my point.
>
> In the paragraph above, marked >>>, which was written by you, you
> speak of deception and forgery. Nothing in the reports of the
> recent incident involving Martin suggests any decept
On 30 May 2006, at 12:50, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
Sorry for late response.
* "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-24 12:10]:
However, contrary to what the NM templates suggest, symbol
versioning
is not a cure-all for all ABI incompatibilities. If libetpan
return
On 27 May 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane verbalised:
> On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 05:19:21PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On 27 May 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane spake thusly:
>>> On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 27 May 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane stated:
>
> The U
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:28:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
> > Perhaps my just-posted message has too many words to see my point.
> >
> > In the paragraph above, marked >>>, which was written by you, you
> > speak of deception and forgery. Nothing i
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:04:29AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> [Benjamin Seidenberg]
> > FYI:
> > 12:33 < Ganneff> and for all those impatient waiting for NEW: i will
> > clear that in my jetlag time, in those nights i
> > cant sleep (ie 1st -> 2nd june,
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:57:04AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Whether doing it this way is a good idea, though, I don't know. Buildd
> > surely wasn't designed for this.
>
> It is much simpler than to set up wanna-build and a local archive
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:05:26PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Timeline
>
>
> Now, let's please take a more detailed look at the time line:
>
>
> Thu 15 Jun 06:
>
> last chance to switch to gcc 4.1, python 2.4
> review architectures one more time
> last
On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst spake thusly:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:28:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
>>> Perhaps my just-posted message has too many words to see my point.
>>>
>>> In the paragraph above, marked >>>, which was written by you,
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:49:34AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst spake thusly:
>
> > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:28:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
> >>> Perhaps my just-posted message has too many words to see my p
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst spake thusly:
>
>> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:28:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>> On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
Perhaps my just-posted message has too many words to see my point.
In the pa
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Christoph Haas schrieb:
>
>>>* NTP server
>>> (some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian
>>> NTP Team, which consists of zero active members)
>
>> I'd take my chance on this one. There is a large number of bugs open and
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:04:29AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>>
>> [Benjamin Seidenberg]
>> > FYI:
>> > 12:33 < Ganneff> and for all those impatient waiting for NEW: i will
>> > clear that in my jetlag time, in those nights i
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:09:07AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Christoph Haas schrieb:
> >
> >>>* NTP server
> >>> (some work required; currently, not-really-maintained by the Debian
> >>> NTP Team, which consists of zero active mem
On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst stated:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 07:49:34AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst spake thusly:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:28:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
> Perhaps my just-p
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:50:41AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst stated:
[...]
> > However, "trusted processes" do not lie with people who are trying
> > to convince you of their identity. If you trust anyone to tell the
> > truth about their identity, which is wh
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
Hi all,
As gcc-4.1 may be the default compiler soon (I hope so), I have tried to
build the glibc with it.
Currently it builds and works on the following architectures:
amd64, hppa, i386, mips, mipsel, sparc
The packages are available [1], but a but outdated. It shoul
People, please move this thread over to -project
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:13:37AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:04:29AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> >> [Benjamin Seidenberg]
> >> > FYI:
> >> > 12:33 < Ganneff> an
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:31:33PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I haven't done a build on m68k yet.
I tried it on akire, but was interrupted by real world issues.
When you could give a more detailed HowTo (sbuild, dpkg-buildpackage,
whatever) I would retry...
--
Ciao...//
On 30 May 2006, Frank Küster told this:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 30 May 2006, Wouter Verhelst spake thusly:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:28:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell stated:
> Perhaps my just-posted message has to
Hi,
This is to forestall those of you who seem to be be arguing
that the debconf6 KSP crack was a red team attack -- here is how that
attack differed from a legitimate red team effort (I have been a
member of red teams before, and have lead a number of red team
attacks in my time).
Hie Gonéri and *,
Am 2006-05-19 12:26:23, schrieb Gonéri Le Bouder:
> > However, another solution would be just place these JPGs and PNGs flat
> > on the server and have apt just download them and save them
> Yes, a public repository where people download the picture when they need it.
This was m
Ingo Juergensmann a écrit :
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:31:33PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
I haven't done a build on m68k yet.
I tried it on akire, but was interrupted by real world issues.
When you could give a more detailed HowTo (sbuild, dpkg-buildpackage,
whatever) I would retry...
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libdata-dump-perl
Version : 1.06
Upstream Author : Gisle Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://mirrors.kernel.org/cpan/modules/by-module/Data/Data-Dump-1.06.tar.g
Manoj,
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:52:11AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> This is to forestall those of you who seem to be be arguing
> that the debconf6 KSP crack was a red team attack -- here is how that
> attack differed from a legitimate red team effort (I have been a
> member of r
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What Martin Krafft showed you was,
>>>
>>> How do I know that person actually was Martin Krafft?
>>
>> This is getting ridiculuous.
>
> With this I tend to agree. Your credulity is unbelievable.
>
>> If what I've read about the incident is
Christoph Haas wrote:
Darcs looks like a nice competitor but has some issues regarding
checking in changes automatically (might as well be my ignorance but it
sounds like I need weird scripts and a .procmailrc to merge changes
automatically).
You don't *need* them; you can choose to do that, bu
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:44:49PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >I tried it on akire, but was interrupted by real world issues.
> >When you could give a more detailed HowTo (sbuild, dpkg-buildpackage,
> >whatever) I would retry...
> Very easy:
> dget http://people.debian.org/~aurel32/glibc/gli
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I really think either you are deliberately being obtuse, or
> nothing I can say will get this through to you. I fail to see how
> one can assert that there was no forgery going on -- do you
> automatically assume that if a shiney laminated
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I claim to be president George Clooney, and show you a
> document that proves I am such, and I earnestly claim it was not
> forged, but Bubba looked at all kinds of documentation that says I am
> such a person, you would proclaim from th
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I guess You can't read. I have never stated that I know it is
> a forgery: I can't since I do not have that data. I have stated I
> have absolutely no trust path to the identity proclaimed, so I am
> going to treat it as though it were; s
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is to forestall those of you who seem to be be arguing
> that the debconf6 KSP crack was a red team attack -- here is how that
> attack differed from a legitimate red team effort (I have been a
> member of red teams before, and have le
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:29:34PM +0200, wrote:
> * libdigest-hmac-perl, libdigest-sha1-perl, libdigest-md2-perl,
> libdigest-perl, libio-interface-perl, libio-socket-multicast-perl,
> libnet-xwhois-perl, libvideo-capture-v4l-perl
> (easy pickings; check for new Upstream)
I guess these pa
On Mon, 29 May 2006 21:29:34 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Unknown) said:
> * ufraw (need to package new Upstream; easy)
I can take this if nobody else wants it.
--
Hubert Chan - email & Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA (Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.
On 30 May 2006, Frank Küster verbalised:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What Martin Krafft showed you was,
How do I know that person actually was Martin Krafft?
>>>
>>> This is getting ridiculuous.
>>
>> With this I tend to agree. Your credulity is unbelievable.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Based on this thread, I would think that Stave Langasek was
> dead on: any transitive trust in Debian's keyring is
> non-existenet. So, using the signed key as a mesure of trust in the
> identity of a NM candidate by the DAMS is probably mi
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:46:30AM -0700, Zak B. Elep wrote:
> >* libdigest-hmac-perl, libdigest-sha1-perl, libdigest-md2-perl,
> > libdigest-perl, libio-interface-perl, libio-socket-multicast-perl,
> > libnet-xwhois-perl, libvideo-capture-v4l-perl
> I'd like to take these up.
Oops, I just saw yo
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:28:19AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This is to forestall those of you who seem to be be arguing
> > that the debconf6 KSP crack was a red team attack -- here is how that
> > attack differed from a legit
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Claiming that what Martin did was good since he was showing
> something useful for our community is equivalent to saying it was a
> "red team attack". Nobody used that term explicitly probably because
> they are unfamiliar with it. I kno
"Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Claiming that what Martin did was good since he was showing something
useful
for our community is equivalent to saying it was a "red team attack".
Nobody
used that term explicitly probably because t
Christoph Haas wrote:
>
> I'm currently looking into several systems. Usually I use Subversion and
> svn-buildpackage but due to a lot of trouble with svn-buildpackage I
> have moved away from repositories for my Debian packages lately.
>
Out of curiousity, what problems have you encountered with
Dear Debian Devel,
Im personally emailing you today to discuss a partnership. I noticed
that your web site debian.org has linked to Tel3. Pingo is a virtual
VoIP calling card service that helps the world save on there long
distance and international calls.
I'm sending you this invitation to
"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, if KSPs are not changed, then the Web of trust becomes
> effectively worthless. Manoj should be far more concerned about
> that, then about Martin's demonstration of this.
Personally, I'm especially worried about the developers who were taken
in by t
also sprach Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.30.1920
+0200]:
> I do agree with Manoj that this was *not* a legitimate experiment (i.e.
> not a "red team" test) and that Martin *did* abuse our [0] trust [1]
I acknowledge this and would like to apologise to everyone.
My
also sprach Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.30.2002 +0200]:
> Personally, I'm especially worried about the developers who were
> taken in by the Transnational Republic ID. So, can we have
> a "fess up" time now? Manoj, did you sign the key on this basis?
He did not.
--
Please
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (gmane.linux.debian.devel.general) you wrote:
> On (29/05/06 21:29), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
>> * gnutls, gcrypt, libtasn1, libksba
>> (security-critical, some work required, having a team for these
>> packages
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:45:10PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Christoph Haas wrote:
> >
> > I'm currently looking into several systems. Usually I use Subversion and
> > svn-buildpackage but due to a lot of trouble with svn-buildpackage I
> > have moved away from repositories for my Debian
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 10:40, Joe Smith wrote:
> But Martin decided to publish this experiment.
> Is this really a bad thing? He proved that KSP are bad for the web of
> trust.
Isn't what Martin and this thread actually demonstrated is that signing keys
based on IDs you cannot reasonably authent
also sprach Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.30.2120 +0200]:
> Even the guy at 7-Eleven has the big book of north american ID cards with
> pictures and descriptions of what makes a real one for when they encounter an
> ID that they've never seen before. Surely Debian can do as well as t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for all your answers, my package successfully transformed
to its new name with apt-get dist-upgrade in my test environment :-)
One last question: would it be safe to say
Architecture: all
in the dummy transition package since it does not cont
* Andreas Fester [Tue, 30 May 2006 21:42:27 +0200]:
> One last question: would it be safe to say
> Architecture: all
> in the dummy transition package since it does not contain
> any architecture specific files anymore, or is it better to
> leave it as it is with "Architecture: any" to create
>
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:20:14PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Even the guy at 7-Eleven has the big book of north american ID cards with
> pictures and descriptions of what makes a real one for when they encounter an
> ID that they've never seen before. Surely Debian can do as well as the guy
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:48:14PM +0200, I (Christoph Haas) wrote:
> * svn-inject
>
> Injecting new packages through svn-inject fails here. I get errors about
> the MKCOL method not being allowed on the remote WebDAV server. Perhaps
> it's a problem that the Apache runs on Sarge while I'm develop
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On arm, ia64 and alpha the glibc fails to build with gcc-4.1.
On Alpha the problem is:
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:341: Error: macro requires $at register while noat in effect
{standard input}:374: Error: macro requires $at
Hi,
* Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-30 22:19]:
> [ crosspost to live, -devel and -edu; replies please to -devel ]
> at the moment, we have two types of Live CD images:
>
> * the small one which contains only packages of standard priority,
> * and three larger ones, each of which
Is it posible to have a minimum size image with a WM that can stay
below 125MB? This would be a great size for USB versions and versions
running under Qemu or VMWare. Just a thought.
desNotes
On 5/30/06, Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ crosspost to live, -devel and -edu; replies ple
Falk Hueffner a écrit :
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On arm, ia64 and alpha the glibc fails to build with gcc-4.1.
On Alpha the problem is:
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:341: Error: macro requires $at register while noat in effect
{standard input}:374
On 5/30/06, Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ crosspost to live, -devel and -edu; replies please to -devel ]
Hi all,
at the moment, we have two types of Live CD images:
* the small one which contains only packages of standard priority,
* and three larger ones, each of which conta
wrote:
> * gnulib
> (easy pickings; need to package new Upstream from CVS, every month or so)
I'll take that.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Falk Hueffner a écrit :
>> Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>On arm, ia64 and alpha the glibc fails to build with gcc-4.1.
>> On Alpha the problem is:
>> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
>> {standard input}:341: Error: macro requires
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 13:02, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:20:14PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Even the guy at 7-Eleven has the big book of north american ID cards with
> > pictures and descriptions of what makes a real one for when they
> > encounter an ID that they've neve
Christoph Haas wrote:
>
> Yes, of course. Besides some minor things I don't quite like about
> Subversion (merging looks like black magic for me and getting out old
> revisions of a file means typing the full URL for no reason) these are
> the actual problems I encountered with svn-buildpackage:
>
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:50:16PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:05:26PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Timeline
> >
> > Now, let's please take a more detailed look at the time line:
> > Thu 15 Jun 06:
> > last chance to switch to gcc 4.1, pyth
[ crosspost to live, -devel and -edu; replies please to -devel ]
Hi all,
at the moment, we have two types of Live CD images:
* the small one which contains only packages of standard priority,
* and three larger ones, each of which contains one of the common
desktop-environments on it (gn
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:29:34PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> * gnulib
> (easy pickings; need to package new Upstream from CVS, every month or so)
I ported quite a lot of C software between IRIX/SunOS/AIX/Linux, so
I'll take it.
> * tcng
> (some clean-up required)
I have some idea about
Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Falk Hueffner a écrit :
> >> Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >>>On arm, ia64 and alpha the glibc fails to build with gcc-4.1.
> >> On Alpha the problem is:
> >> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
> >> {sta
Paul Johnson wrote:
>> See, if you visit a bazaar, I bet a helpful guy with a Russian accent
>> can sell you a perfectly valid passport for less than $50. Several
>> years ago, a friend of mine actually asked someone at the Stadion
>> 10-lecia in Warsaw, and was led to a guy with a number of blan
This one time, at band camp, Paul Johnson said:
> On Tuesday 30 May 2006 13:02, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > See, if you visit a bazaar, I bet a helpful guy with a Russian
> > accent can sell you a perfectly valid passport for less than $50.
> > Several years ago, a friend of mine actually asked someon
Nico Golde wrote:
> Would be useful if you could provide the package lists for
> the two images so we can see whats already included and send
> you patches.
The small one contains the standard system only, means, packages which
have Priority: standard and nothing more. That's about 80MB (the ima
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:57:18PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 May 2006 13:02, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > See, if you visit a bazaar, I bet a helpful guy with a Russian accent
> > can sell you a perfectly valid passport for less than $50. Several
> > years ago, a friend of mine actual
Michael Fisher wrote:
> Is it posible to have a minimum size image with a WM that can stay
> below 125MB? This would be a great size for USB versions and versions
> running under Qemu or VMWare. Just a thought.
Yes, but those mini-images are separate thing we do anyway (or provide
an easy possibli
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Heikki Henriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: evolution-jescs
Version : 2.6.2
Upstream Author : Several Authors
* URL : http://www.go-evolution.org/Evolution_JESCS
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
On 29-May-06, 03:57 (CDT), Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FWIW, libtool scripts are a bit more complex. Unrelated though,
> Libtool records the shell and its features; if you change /bin/sh
> from bash to dash, the installed /usr/bin/libtool will have its
> $echo setting wrong, and
Eric Cooper wrote:
> I suggest that you provide the same packages that Knoppix does (as long
> as they're free), since Knoppix has been out there with a real user
> community for several years now. No need to reinvent the wheel.
True, but knoppix is i386/amd64 only. Debian Live works on i386/amd6
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 14:26, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:57:18PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 May 2006 13:02, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > See, if you visit a bazaar, I bet a helpful guy with a Russian accent
> > > can sell you a perfectly valid passport for le
On Tuesday 30 May 2006 14:15, Linas Žvirblis wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> >> See, if you visit a bazaar, I bet a helpful guy with a Russian accent
> >> can sell you a perfectly valid passport for less than $50. Several
> >> years ago, a friend of mine actually asked someone at the Stadion
> >> 1
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 10:32:15AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I am actually quite ambivalent about whether I think what he did was
> wrong; I think to determine that I would need to read carefully what
> the KSP organizers said. Martin certainly should follow the protocols
> established,
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
