Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I guess You can't read. I have never stated that I know it is > a forgery: I can't since I do not have that data. I have stated I > have absolutely no trust path to the identity proclaimed, so I am > going to treat it as though it were; since there is, in my opinion, > already an act of bad faith in play since someone is trying to trick > people into signing keys based on a identification paper from less > than trusted sources.
Whether a source is trusted depends on the truster. An ID might be an excellent trusted path for one person and not for another. For example, my University of California ID. Indeed, I might sign a photograph affidavit of identity for a friend of mine. People who know me and know my signature would accept that as ID for the friend; people who do not know me or do not know my signature should not accept that as ID. It is you that do not trust a Transnational Republic ID, and with good reason. You shouldn't trust it, and neither should or would I. But that does *not* mean that anyone who presents it is trying to trick you. >> Why do you keep claiming that he did deliberately change things on >> this Transnational Republic ID card? > > Where did I make this claim? I know english is not your first > language, but you know, these idiotic accusations are getting rather > shrill. You claim that there was forgery. Or at least, you were claiming that. > No, giving me Bubba's ID cards and putting the burden of proof > on me does not absolve the evil doer from the fact that an attempt to > trick people was in play. What was the trick? Exactly, please. What fact were people being tricked into believing? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
