On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 08:15:21AM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> * Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-10 23:11]:
>> there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release
>> team whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch.
> I'm in favour of gcc 4.1 as it would provid
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 01:10:16AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Unfortunately, other mailing list discussions have been less
> happy. A somewhat acrimonious argument between Sven Luther and members
> of the d-i team spread out across various lists, starting at
> [3]. There has been quite lot of p
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:33:45PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Why would that not fly?
> Both versions of the arch-independent package could be installed at
> the same time.
/usr/share/foo/bar can't point to two different files at the same time,
so you can't install multiple package version
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 08:59]:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
> > whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading to
> > freeze etch rather soon
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:00:46AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 08:59]:
> > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
> > > whether we could switch gcc to
On 5/11/06, Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:33:45PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Why would that not fly?
> Both versions of the arch-independent package could be installed at
> the same time.
/usr/share/foo/bar can't point to two different files at the sa
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
hi,
> there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
> whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading to
what about the transition to python 2.4? is it going to start or etch
is go
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 01:10:16AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Unfortunately, other mailing list discussions have been less
>> happy. A somewhat acrimonious argument between Sven Luther and members
>> of the d-i team spread out across various lists, sta
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 11:00]:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > Hi,
> >
> > hi,
> >
> > > there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to th
Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 10:09 +0200, Domenico Andreoli a écrit :
> what about the transition to python 2.4? is it going to start or etch
> is going to ship with 2.3?
An upload of python-defaults switching to 2.4 has been repeatedly asked
during the last months, and it was ignored by the maintainer.
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 10:48]:
> Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 10:09 +0200, Domenico Andreoli a écrit :
> > what about the transition to python 2.4? is it going to start or etch
> > is going to ship with 2.3?
>
> An upload of python-defaults switching to 2.4 has been repeatedly as
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> hi,
>
> > there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
> > whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for e
Hello Lars,
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 03:35 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> A checksum is a number that identifies the contents of a file: if the
> contents change, so does the checksum. If you create a checksum before
> you burn a CD, when you know the files are correct, you can easily
> check the
On Tue, 9 May 2006 11:07:27, John Goerzen wrote:
: Hello,
:
: I intend to take over the Bacula package. I would first like to say
: thanks to Jose Luis Tallon for initially packaging it for Debian and
: maintaining it for these years.
:
: A brief history of why I intend to do this:
:
: * Bacul
Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 11:12:35AM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
>> > The rest of the system accounts are happily running with /bin/false
>>
>> There is now /bin/nologin which is more secure
>
> I think you mean /usr/sbin/nologin, right? Please define "more sec
> I didn't hit this problem myself yet, but it has been mentioned on
> sparclinux list that 4.1 currently miscompiles the sparc kernel.
Do you know if this still happens, and if so, whether someone has
tracked it down?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
* Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 09:13]:
> I'd certainly prefer we shipped with the least bugs, rather than with
> "fairly recent" software; I don't know if these goals contradict or
> concur in this particular case.
FWIW, the GCC 4.0.3 Status Report (2006-01-15) says, "It's in
Roberto Lumbreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Ok, the maintainer has not fixed the bugs, has not packaged the last
> version of it in time, etc, but he has done a great job anyway, and I
> still don't see the point of hijacking the package.
So he has done not one of the things expected of
* Roberto Lumbreras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I don't agree, all those things are not in my opinion enough for the
> hijacking.
Thankfully, you're wrong.
> The package has bugs, lots of them, and for that reason has been removed
> from testing, well done, unstable it is here for that.
It's *n
Hi Andi,
On Wednesday, 10 May 2006, you wrote:
> there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
> whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading to
I know, tbm tried to build all packages on mips*. It would be intersting
to know, how other architectu
> I am strongly against compressing PDFs
To add insult to injury, PDF 1.5 introduces ``object streams'' which
allow compressing arbitrarily long chunks of a PDF file without giving
up the random-access properties of PDF. All current Free PDF readers
grok PDF 1.5, although as far as I know no Free
Package: general
Severity: wishlist
It would be great if we could move to GCC 4.1 for etch. The release
managers have now given us a concrete target we have to achieve before
this can happen: the majority of outstanding 4.1 specific bugs in
packages have to be fixed by mid of June [1]. The RC bu
On 3/9/06, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/6/06, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I think you can tell pretty clearly that Bernd has no objection at all
> > to NMU's.
>
> yes, but please not for wishlist bugs. Again:
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 01:09:11PM +0200, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
> The package has bugs, lots of them, and for that reason has been removed
> from testing, well done, unstable it is here for that.
Uh no. I find it scary that you share this same idea as the original
bacula maintainer. Unstable is
Roberto Lumbreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The package has bugs, lots of them, and for that reason has been removed
> from testing, well done, unstable it is here for that.
No, it isn't. Maybe experimental is for that; but unstable is for
software that is targetted to be moved to etch and to
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> An upload of python-defaults switching to 2.4 has been repeatedly asked
>> during the last months, and it was ignored by the maintainer. I'm not
>> aware of anything preventing this upload currently.
> The maintainer is not ignoring it, but the t
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 01:09:11PM +0200, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
> rover, Jose Luis's sponsor and uploader of many of his packages including
> bacula, you can blame me also if you want
Others have pretty well addressed the rest of your message already. I'd
like to expand on this point.
I've be
* Ganesan Rajagopal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 14:12]:
> > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> An upload of python-defaults switching to 2.4 has been repeatedly asked
> >> during the last months, and it was ignored by the maintainer. I'm not
> >> aware of anything preventing this
* Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 13:38]:
> I know, tbm tried to build all packages on mips*. It would be intersting
> to know, how other architectures behave. Also i have not seen any
> comments from doko yet.
I built mips and amd64, and in the mean time also powerpc and most o
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 07:46:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
:
: Roberto,
:
: Your mailer is busted. You might want to fix it- it's setting an
: invalid Reply-To address. Below is the bounce (including my reply, if
: you don't see it on d-d).
My fault, I misplaced the msgid of the mail
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 14:20]:
> > I know, tbm tried to build all packages on mips*. It would be intersting
> > to know, how other architectures behave. Also i have not seen any
> > comments from doko yet.
> I built mips and amd64, and in the mean time also powerpc and m
* Roberto Lumbreras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Speaking about your mail, I think it's your opinion, mine is different.
Sure, but you're looking through some very rosy glasses.
> Jose Luis doesn't want just his name in some place, he has worked a lot
> in bacula in the past, and I don't know why
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 366820 by 357961
Bug#366820: Transition to GCC 4.1 for etch
Was blocked by: 355163 355352 355396 355598 355841 355983 355989 355997 356004
356093 356109 356110 356116 356160 356228 356232 356238 356246 356248 356303
356304 356366 356370 356436 3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 366820 by 355163
Bug#366820: Transition to GCC 4.1 for etch
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 355163
> block 366820 by 355352
Bug#366820: Transition to GCC 4.1 for etch
Was blocked by: 355163
Blocking bugs added: 355352
> block 3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 366820 by 366821
Bug#366820: Transition to GCC 4.1 for etch
Was blocked by: 275774 355163 355165 355189 355325 355326 355352 355396 355463
355598 355599 355663 355738 355739 355741 355744 355841 355980 355983 355986
355988 355989 355990 355992 3
Martin,
Is this auto-trace program available for public use?
Thanks,
Stan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 10:00]:
> > One: What's the easiest way to extract the list of gcc-4.1 related bugs
> > from the BTS?
>
> There is none I know - I asked Martin already yesterday on IRC to
> provide such a way.
I've created the following meta bug: 366820
--
Martin
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A checksum is a number that identifies the contents of a file: if the
> contents change, so does the checksum. If you create a checksum before
> you burn a CD, when you know the files are correct, you can easily
> check the CD at any time: just comp
On 5/11/06, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 10:00]:
> > One: What's the easiest way to extract the list of gcc-4.1 related bugs
> > from the BTS?
>
> There is none I know - I asked Martin already yesterday on IRC to
> provide such a way.
* Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 11:20]:
> Why you did this metabug thing, and not just usertagged the bugs ? The
> results seems to be similar, but i don't think that a metabug can be
> managed by email, usertags are.
What can not be managed by email?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cxxtools
Version : 1.4.1pre2
Upstream Author : Tommi Mäkitalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.tntnet.org/
* License : GPL v2 or later
Programming Lang: C++
Descri
also sprach Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.1535 +0200]:
> * License : GPL v2 or later
That will make it pretty useless for non-GPL applications. Why don't
you choose (if possible) a less "viral" licence?
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.'
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:46:22PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.1535 +0200]:
> > * License : GPL v2 or later
>
> That will make it pretty useless for non-GPL applications.
Non-GPL compatible applications, you mean?
> Why don't y
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:46:22PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>> also sprach Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.1535 +0200]:
>> > * License : GPL v2 or later
>>
>> That will make it pretty useless for non-GPL applications.
>
> Non-GP
Frank Küster wrote:
> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:46:22PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> >> also sprach Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.1535 +0200]:
> >> > * License : GPL v2 or later
> >>
> >> That will make it pretty useless for
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:46:22PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.1535 +0200]:
> * License
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:46:22PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>>> also sprach Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.1535 +0200]:
>>> > * License : GPL v2 or later
>>>
>>> That will make it pr
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That will make it pretty useless for non-GPL applications.
[...]
> As a derived work of a GPL'd work, the aggregate is covered by the GPL
> license.
So the aggregate, in other words the *application* would be a
GPL-application, right? Which make
Frank Küster wrote:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:46:22PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:46:22PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTEC
Sorry for the late answer...
> 3) How would synaptic (for instance) know which packages have which
> images? I suppose you would need a Packages-like file with this
> information... (This will not be incorporated in the main Packages
> file... not before this idea being proved as possible and usef
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 02:21:37AM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>> I am strongly against compressing PDFs
> To add insult to injury, PDF 1.5 introduces ``object streams'' which
> allow compressing arbitrarily long chunks of a PDF file without
> giving up the random-access properties of PDF. A
On 5/11/06, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 11:20]:
> Why you did this metabug thing, and not just usertagged the bugs ? The
> results seems to be similar, but i don't think that a metabug can be
> managed by email, usertags are.
What
* Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 14:39]:
> >> Why you did this metabug thing, and not just usertagged the bugs ? The
> >> results seems to be similar, but i don't think that a metabug can be
> >> managed by email, usertags are.
> >What can not be managed by email?
> The metabug itse
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libwiki-toolkit-perl
Version : 0.70
Upstream Author : The Wiki::Toolkit team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.wiki-toolkit.org/
* License : Dual GPL/Artistic
D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libwiki-toolkit-formatter-usemod-perl
Version : 0.19
Upstream Author : The Wiki::Toolkit project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.wiki-toolkit.org/
* License : D
On 5/11/06, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 14:39]:
> >> Why you did this metabug thing, and not just usertagged the bugs ? The
> >> results seems to be similar, but i don't think that a metabug can be
> >> managed by email, usertags ar
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # This bug is from 2000, and the submitter failed to give the requested
> # followup information. Furthermore devfs is dead meat.
> close 78282
Bug#78282: DevFS incompatabilities
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 02:20:29PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 13:38]:
> > I know, tbm tried to build all packages on mips*. It would be intersting
> > to know, how other architectures behave. Also i have not seen any
> > comments from doko
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:59:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
>
>I have created a new page in the wiki to track info and status
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/multiarch
I looked at the "upstream standards proposal":
http://lackof.org/taggart/hacking/multiarch/
It's good.
I am particularly pleased by the specification:
"The terms arch and os represent the Archit
On Thu, 11 May 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Ganesan Rajagopal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 14:12]:
> > > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > >> An upload of python-defaults switching to 2.4 has been repeatedly asked
> > >> during the last months, and it was ignored by the mainta
also sprach Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.1702 +0200]:
> > That will make it pretty useless for non-GPL applications.
>
> Non-GPL compatible applications, you mean?
Yeah well. IMHO that pretty much excludes all sensible licences.
> > Why don't you choose (if possible) a less "vi
* Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 15:05]:
> >Well, I've no idea what you mean by "manage". You can add new
> >blockers to the meta bug and remove them, which is all I want to
> >do.
> by mail, really ?
Yeah, "block xx by foo".
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UN
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 08:37:35AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
: * Roberto Lumbreras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: > Speaking about your mail, I think it's your opinion, mine is different.
:
: Sure, but you're looking through some very rosy glasses.
hey, I've tried to be fair...
: > Jose Luis doe
On Thu, 11 May 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "The terms arch and os represent the Architecture and Operating System
> as defined and provided by config.guess."
Well, config.sub is the one whose function is to provide canonical
names, config.guess might not do so for one reason or another (but
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:30:40PM +0200, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
> He has packaged the last version of bacula, and it is not uploaded
> because it's not ready, then a new version was showed up... he has a
> personal apt repository that users from bacula mailing list uses, and
> packages (not yet
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 11:34:50AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:59:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:56:04PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 11:34:50AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:59:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL
> > > PRO
Does anyone know why the binary package gnome is no longer in testing?
The source package meta-gnome2 is there
Julian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 16:46 +0200, martin f krafft a écrit :
> also sprach Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.1535 +0200]:
> > * License : GPL v2 or later
>
> That will make it pretty useless for non-GPL applications. Why don't
> you choose (if possible) a less "viral" licence?
* Julian Gilbey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 22:17]:
> Does anyone know why the binary package gnome is no longer in testing?
> The source package meta-gnome2 is there
Seems like an accident currently. We're researching the matter.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
T
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "OndÅej Surý" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libodbc++
Version : 0.2.4pre3
Upstream Author : Manush Dodunekov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://libodbcxx.sourceforge.net
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C++
D
"Matt Taggart and others" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi debian-devel,
For a couple years now a few of us have been talking about an idea called
"multiarch". This is a way to seamlessly allow support for multiple
different
binary targets on the same system, for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I have created a new page in the wiki to track info and status
> >
> > http://wiki.debian.org/multiarch
>
> I looked at the "upstream standards proposal":
> http://lackof.org/taggart/hacking/multiarch/
>
> It's good.
> I am particularly pleased by the specification:
>
On 5/10/06, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Better to create 15.000 additional DEB's with pics and additonal
descriptoons (per screenshoot) and make Meta packages to instal with
apt-get install aptpics-all (for installing the
whole
David Nusinow wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:30:40PM +0200, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
>
>> He has packaged the last version of bacula, and it is not uploaded
>> because it's not ready, then a new version was showed up... he has a
>> personal apt repository that users from bacula mailing list
Em Qui, 2006-05-11 às 09:56 +0200, Gabor Gombas escreveu:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:33:45PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > Why would that not fly?
> > Both versions of the arch-independent package could be installed at
> > the same time.
> /usr/share/foo/bar can't point to two different fil
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 23:07 +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> > John has managed to not only update to the latest upstream version in his
> > upload, but he's also managed to fix 24 bugs by my count. It is notable
> > that he has managed to achieve so much while Jose struggled just to update
> > to
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roberto Lumbreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
>> Ok, the maintainer has not fixed the bugs, has not packaged the last
>> version of it in time, etc, but he has done a great job anyway, and I
>> still don't see the point of hijacking the
Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> hi,
>
>> there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
>> whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading to
>
> what about the t
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 23:54]:
> Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > what about the transition to python 2.4? is it going to start or etch
> > is going to ship with 2.3?
>
> Yeah, what about it?
>
> There is an open bug, it's blocking lilypond which should
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 10:48]:
>> Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 10:09 +0200, Domenico Andreoli a écrit :
>> > what about the transition to python 2.4? is it going to start or etch
>> > is going to ship with 2.3?
>>
>> An upload of pytho
also sprach Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.2219 +0200]:
> I think this is the whole point of licensing a library under the GPL.
For me the point of a library is code reuse. Putting a library under
the GPL is more of a political statement.
> There's not much point in using a copy
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 23:54]:
>> Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > what about the transition to python 2.4? is it going to start or etch
>> > is going to ship with 2.3?
>>
>> Yeah, what about it?
>>
>> There
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 23:56]:
> So, what are the issues that need to be fixed? Currently #360851
> doesn't say it's blocked by anything, and two packages are blocked
> waiting for it.
As said, I put it on my "need to work on"-list, and you'll get results
in May (and ho
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060512 00:00]:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 23:54]:
> >> Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > what about the transition to python 2.4? is it going to start or etch
> >>
* Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 20:21]:
> On Thu, 11 May 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Ganesan Rajagopal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 14:12]:
> > > > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > >> An upload of python-defaults switching to 2.4 has been repeatedly asked
>
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 11:07:55PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote:
[ snip ]
> I have myself fixed in excess of 40 bugs in my packages in the last 48h,
> when I have been back to speed.
> So what???
I had already checked the packages you posted on sf.net and have not been able
to find bug fixes an
Package: general
Severity: wishlist
Looking at the myriad ways of starting messages in /var/log/boot,
Starting X TrueType font server: xfstt.
Starting /usr/sbin/chronyd...
Starting anac(h)ronistic cron: anacron.
Starting deferred execution scheduler: atd.
Starting periodic command scheduler
(e
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:32:36PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Julian Gilbey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 22:17]:
> > Does anyone know why the binary package gnome is no longer in testing?
> > The source package meta-gnome2 is there
>
> Seems like an accident currently. We're researching th
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:30:40PM +0200, Roberto Lumbreras wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 08:37:35AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> : > Jose Luis doesn't want just his name in some place, he has worked a lot
> : > in bacula in the past, and I don't know why he can't remain as
> : > maintainer or
to, 2006-05-11 kello 07:13 -0700, Ben Pfaff kirjoitti:
> It's not clear to me, from the description, what the program does
> that the md5sum and sha1sum utilities do not.
It handles .dsc, .changes, and Sources files. But I also forgot to
mention the main reason I wrote it: it gives progress feedba
Hi,
I'd add localepurge - witch save my >25 % disk space on 6-700 mb
installation.
Thanks!
Eugen Paiuc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:49:26PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
> On the other hand, if we continue that thought process we could end up
> with all headers and libraries in /usr/share/, which is absurd.
Why? This is exactly what's beautiful, especially if EVERYTHING ends up in
/usr/share/ at one day,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> It is the responsibility of a package maintainer to ensure that fixes for
> bugs are uploaded in a timely manner. If José Luis isn't able to do this,
> because he doesn't have a sponsor or for any other reason, then he is not an
> effective maintainer for the package.
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Santiago Ruano Rincón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: asterisk-prompt-es-co
Version : 0.0.20060503
Upstream Author : Avatar Ltda. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.avatar.com.co/
* License : GPL
Description
On Thursday 11 May 2006 01:25, Frank Küster wrote:
> The only things that should be installed separately are
> probably aptitude, apt and dpkg, then just dist-upgrade.
>
From memory, upgrading apt + friends seperately isn't possible whilst synaptic is installed. In sarge, the gnome meta package
Stephen Frost wrote:
>> If the maintainer still wants to maintain it, help him, do NMUs, whatever,
>> but I'm still looking for one reason you can take over the package against
>> the maintainer's opinion.
>>
>
> He wants to have his name on the package w/o doing the work
> (apparently).
What
* Jos? Luis Tall?n ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Actually, we've heard in this thread that Stephen (his AM) *did* offer to
> > sponsor bacula uploads, and José Luis did not avail himself of this.
> When the offer did come, I wasn't able to prepare the upload anyway.
> I sus
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
