Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:46:22PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: >> also sprach Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.11.1535 +0200]: >> > * License : GPL v2 or later >> >> That will make it pretty useless for non-GPL applications. > > Non-GPL compatible applications, you mean?
Which non-GPL license can I choose for a software that uses this library? > Seconds, since when do we consider the GPL to be viral? Don't know about you, but the FSF does - it has created the LGPL because of this. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
