On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:56:04PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 11:34:50AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:59:27AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > > there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team > > > > > whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading > > > > > to > > > > what about the transition to python 2.4? is it going to start or etch > > > > is going to ship with 2.3? > > > what about the transition to libgnutls13 ? I noticed yesterday when > > > debootstraping that we get libgnutls11, 12 AND 13 installed by default. > > > Do we really need that many libgnutls ? > > I don't see anything at all in the reverse-deps that would explain > > libgnutls11 being pulled in by debootstrap. Is it still hard-coded in a > > package list somewhere in the version of debootstrap you're using? > # grep-available -s Package -s Priority -P libgnutls > (...) > Package: libgnutls12 > Priority: standard > > Package: libgnutls13 > Priority: important > > Package: libgnutls11 > Priority: important Cool, even better: fixable just by filing a bug on ftp.d.o asking for the priority to be dropped. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
