> Well, my point was to have a common predefined way of doing it: once you
> install kdm (or someone else), or move to xdm or whatever, you still can
> disable the start of X by putting nox in the command line, instead of having
> to erase the links in rc2.d.
Acutally there should be no link in ru
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I noticed the pdp1Â-unix-v{5,6,7} images - how useful are they really?
popcon suggests that only a few people have installed them.
Since Kevin now orphaned them and they are non-free, can we get rid of
th
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 09:04:21AM +0100, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
>
> > Well, my point was to have a common predefined way of doing it: once you
> > install kdm (or someone else), or move to xdm or whatever, you still can
> > disable the start of X by putting nox in the command line, instead of hav
> Thats not true. Read the Debian Policy. Its just that some other
> distributions use runlevel 2 for console mode. In Debian thats all up to
> the user/administrator of the system. Of course we can change this but
> its not true currently.
Sorry, consider me spoiled by SuSE which I am forced to
ATTN: READ CAREFULLY,
Compliments of the season.I have to start by introducing myself to you.I am
Dr.Mark David,the
Head of Delegation to the WorldBank in West Africa.I am the linkman between
the Organization
For Petroleum Exporting Countries -OPEC and the petroleum sector in a West
African c
On Friday 04 March 2005 10:22, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> > Thats not true. Read the Debian Policy. Its just that some other
> > distributions use runlevel 2 for console mode. In Debian thats all up
> > to the user/administrator of the system. Of course we can change this
> > but its not true curren
> see
> http://www.linuxbase.org/modules.php?name=specrev&url=http://www.linuxbase.org/spec//booksets/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/set1.html
> for what the LSB has to say about the subject
So its seems SuSE was following LSB recommendations.
Just wondering if Debian should switch to LSB reco
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: debsync
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Jerome Alet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://www.librelogiciel.com/software/debsync/acti
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:12:48PM +0100, Florian Ragwitz wrote:
>debsync is a Python command line tool which helps to synchronise the
>installed packages lists on several existing Debian GNU/Linux
>machines.
>
>debsync gets a list of installed packages from a master host, and
>
When you install an alsa-modules package for the 2.4 kernel, you get
alsa-base per the dependencies. However, when you install sarge with a
2.6 kernel, alsa-base doesn't end up being installed. The result is that
for most sound cards, both OSS and ALSA modules end up installed,
resulting in various
Josselin Mouette wrote:
2.6 kernel, alsa-base doesn't end up being installed. The result is that
for most sound cards, both OSS and ALSA modules end up installed,
resulting in various and random problems. To avoid that, shouldn't the
kernel-image packages for 2.6 depend on alsa-base?
Please not. Th
Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 03:47:32PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 03:25:48PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
Obfuscated code does not satisfy DFSG#2. I hope nobody seriously
disagrees with this.
Let's not be so fast with this. I haven't taken a
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 12:12 +0100, Florian Ragwitz wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> * Package name: debsync
> Version : 1.0
> Upstream Author : Jerome Alet <[EMAIL PROTE
A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 03:47:32PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 03:25:48PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>>>
>>>
Obfuscated code does not satisfy DFSG#2. I hope nobody seriously
disagrees with t
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Source code is source code. Obfuscated or not does not change that. It
> fullfills at least the letter of DFSG#2. For it to violate DFSG#2 you
> would have to show that it is not source and the gcc already prooves
> you wrong there. If you use 'obf
Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Source code is source code. Obfuscated or not does not change that. It
>> fullfills at least the letter of DFSG#2. For it to violate DFSG#2 you
>> would have to show that it is not source and the gcc al
Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Source code is source code. Obfuscated or not does not change that. It
> > fullfills at least the letter of DFSG#2. For it to violate DFSG#2 you
> > would have to show that it is not source and the gcc already prooves
> > y
Maykel Moya dijo [Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 02:54:09PM -0400]:
> Don't know whether the appropiate list for this post should be
> debian-users or this.
>
> March 25, a Congress of Free Software will take place at UCI, here in
> Cuba. I'd been preparing myself to give a talk about the Debian Project.
>
Gah... Sorry for this Spanish last mail, it was supposed to be sent
only to Maykel Mora.
/me ducks.
Greetings,
--
Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)1451-2244 / 5554-9450
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
--
To UNSUBSCRI
* Kalle Kivimaa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050304 17:35]:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Source code is source code. Obfuscated or not does not change that. It
> > fullfills at least the letter of DFSG#2. For it to violate DFSG#2 you
> > would have to show that it is not source an
Le vendredi 04 mars 2005 à 15:29 +0100, Thomas Viehmann a écrit :
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > 2.6 kernel, alsa-base doesn't end up being installed. The result is that
> > for most sound cards, both OSS and ALSA modules end up installed,
> > resulting in various and random problems. To avoid that,
sorry, wrong posting
(I must switch to a better news reader!)
a.
A Mennucc wrote:
Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 03:47:32PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 03:25:48PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
Obfuscated code does not satisfy DFSG#2. I hope nobody serious
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:31:06PM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:18:14AM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > > If so... then it's flat-out not available on the set of systems in
> > > question
>
> > Hm? it is on all my systems:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 05:08:36PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> In my eye even _deliberate_ obfuscation (which remains to be proven)
> does not violate the letter of DFSG#2 while it does not follow its
> spirit. There are other sources in Debian that are far more unreadbale
> or even compil
> When you install an alsa-modules package for the 2.4 kernel, you get
> alsa-base per the dependencies. However, when you install sarge with a
> 2.6 kernel, alsa-base doesn't end up being installed. The result is that
> for most sound cards, both OSS and ALSA modules end up installed,
> resultin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: camlrpc
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : Gerd Stolpmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.ocaml-programming.de/programming/rpc.html
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, M
[Nikita V. Youshchenko]
> Maybe it's better just not to provide oss drivers for chips supported
> by alsa? AFAIK OSS will be removed from kernel soon...
It may or may not be removed soon - I note that it isn't listed in
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt in kernel 2.6.11 yet.
Anyway, two
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Can we assume your systems are all Linux-based Debian?
Frankly I dont care about others, yes. I mean it is OK to use portable
interfaces where present, I just dont think this works in all cases.
In that specific case of course runlevel is already a gen
hey folks,
you might remember some time ago i started a thread[1] or two[2] about
developing a consistant policy/feel for how database (more specifically
rdbms) application packages should work. well, since then i've spent
a lot of time working on both a 'best practices' document as well as
a deb
Bug 296693 is a grave bug which reports a catastrophic guile crash in
gnucash. However, it doesn't happen for me. The user told me that it
did happen even for other machines of his. Yet, nobody else has
reported it.
Can a user with an i386 attempt to reproduce the bug and report back?
Also, I
Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 05:08:36PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> In my eye even _deliberate_ obfuscation (which remains to be proven)
>> does not violate the letter of DFSG#2 while it does not follow its
>> spirit. There are other sources in Debian
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> 2.6 kernel, alsa-base doesn't end up being installed. The result is that
>> for most sound cards, both OSS and ALSA modules end up installed,
>> resulting in various and random problems. To avoid that, shouldn't the
>> kernel
to reply to my own post...
i was under the impression that because dbconfig-common was previously
in experimental that i wouldn't have problems related to the stalled
NEW queue, but i was wrong.
so you can get them here:
deb http://people.debian.org/~seanius/policy/examples/ ./
deb-src http:
Heyllooo it's me Jessica... husband left me home alone
I have an profile online, which you can browse...if you want to have some =
fun we can meet up
http://cloudygrand.com/d/b/8.php
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
On Friday 04 March 2005 23.57, sean finney wrote:
> anyone who is tired of having to spend hours maintaining their
> home-rolled mysql/pgsql mangement maintainer script code is whole
> heartedly encouraged to check this out!
*applaudes heartily*
That's sorely needed. Now I hope that the point wh
tags 296693 +unreproducible
thanks
On Saturday 05 March 2005 00.16, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Can a user with an i386 attempt to reproduce the bug and report back?
I appear to be able to use gnucash just fine, I checked all the library
versions in the bug report and adjusted my system accord
36 matches
Mail list logo
