Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Source code is source code. Obfuscated or not does not change that. It > > fullfills at least the letter of DFSG#2. For it to violate DFSG#2 you > > would have to show that it is not source and the gcc already prooves > > you wrong there. If you use 'obfuscation' or in other words > > 'readability' as measurement what source is then a lot of perl code > > would not qualify in my eyes. > > Source code is commonly defined as "the author's most preferred source > of making modifications".
That's not the common definition but the GPL one. IMO the IOCCC stuff is source, and it's unlikely the author wrote it in the final form. Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
