* Kalle Kivimaa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050304 17:35]: > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Source code is source code. Obfuscated or not does not change that. It > > fullfills at least the letter of DFSG#2. For it to violate DFSG#2 you > > would have to show that it is not source and the gcc already prooves > > you wrong there. If you use 'obfuscation' or in other words > > 'readability' as measurement what source is then a lot of perl code > > would not qualify in my eyes. > Source code is commonly defined as "the author's most preferred source > of making modifications".
No. There are people running around claiming this, but that doesn't make it truth. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
