Your mail to 'Consume-thenet' with the subject
Re: That movie
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Post by non-member to a members-only list
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
notification of th
Dear ,
JARING E-Mail Virus Scanner has detected virus(es) in your e-mail attachment(s)
Original Date: Aug 21 12:57:10
Original Sender:
Original To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Original Subject: Undeliverable: ALERT: You may have sent a Virus
Virus info:-
Attachname: h7L4
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:57:06PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> Who is interested in stack protection?
>
> I think it would be good to have some experiments of stack protected packages
> for Debian. Probably the best way to do this would be to start with
> ssh-stack and sysklogd-stack being up
Scott James Remnant:
If you read the script,
I did, but I couldn't figure out what was the input.
The only MD5 sums that GNU have provided are for 2.4, 2.4.1 and 2.4.2
Right. I sent them an update mail earlier this week, but I guess they're
quite busy at the moment...
--
\\//
Peter - http://www.s
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:18:24AM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, cobaco wrote:
> > > I'd agree if there had been a rewrite of kdelibs or something, but
> > > kde 3.1 -> 3.2 is evolutionary without big changes to what was
> > > already t
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 14:56, Brian May wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:57:06PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > Who is interested in stack protection?
> >
> > I think it would be good to have some experiments of stack protected
> > packages for Debian. Probably the best way to do this would be to
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 19:00:54 -0600, Jamin W Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 14:46, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On 20 Aug 2003 10:51:54 -0400, Adam C Powell IV said:
>> >
>> > Greetings, Installing a new kernel package can be a bit of a
>> > pain, especially for newbies, w
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 23:40:18 -0400 (EDT), Jaldhar H Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Since the source goes into Debian main, keeping the sources
>> together means that we are distributing non-free material in Debian
>> main, which not only violates
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hello,
>
> The package barrendero is a candidate for removal from testing. It has
I had a quick look at the BTS and it seems that the two RC bugs may be
easily fixed (one is a missing Build-Depends on debhelper, the other
an error in debian/rules for
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 15:16:05 +0200, Josef Spillner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>- the KDE release plan might be delayed (as well...)
The sarge release plan _will_ be delayed.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | "
С уважением,Андрей Кислухин, ТДА(8652) 995
850/1/2/3/4
Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Of course, I could (and have) uploaded my key on public servers, meaning
> that other Debian member could check than a given mail with my address
> desserve the trust they habitually give me. But those guys would have to
> configure their email spe
Your mail to 'suse-s390-announce' with the subject
Re: Approved
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Post by non-member to a members-only list
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
notification of
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 08:56:31AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 15:16:05 +0200, Josef Spillner
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >- the KDE release plan might be delayed (as well...)
> The sarge release plan _will_ be delayed.
Quite confident, are we?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Russell Coker wrote:
> Who is interested in stack protection?
> I think it would be good to have some experiments of stack protected packages
> for Debian.
> Also is there any interest in uploading a kernel-image package with the grsec
> PaX support built in?
grsec is IMHO
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 10:04:40AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Ok. Lets leave aside for a moment the .debs which would go into contrib
> or non-free so would have to be built seperately. What happens if
> webmin-squid has an RC bug? As Goswin said, all the webmin-* packages
> will be held ba
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 05:20:42PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> As for the problem with the source file containing non-free code,
> if you have prestine source code, this is something that
> really needs to get fixed upstream :-(, eg. split into two
> files.
Looking at the other messages in the thr
Quoting Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Quoting Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > > No he wouldn't. FDL is about free documentation. :-)
> > > >
> > > Except it isn't :-)
> >
> > According to you :-)
>
> According to deb
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 17:39, Xavier Roche wrote:
> Major issues for a ro-/ are maybe:
> - using devfs for /dev (kernel 2.4 and package devfsd installed)
Devfs is getting less support now, it might not be the best time to start
depending on it.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security
Recipient of the attachment: SEXCHANGE, RADIANT\RII, StellaHsieh(謝立欣)/收件匣
Subject of the message: Re: That movie
No action was taken on the attachment.
Attachment document_9446.pif was Logged Only for the following reasons:
Scan Engine Failure (0x80004005)
Recipient of the attachment: SEXCHANGE, First Storage Group\Mailbox Store
(SEXCHANGE), mailbackup/收件匣
Subject of the message: Re: That movie
No action was taken on the attachment.
Attachment document_9446.pif was Logged Only for the following reasons:
Scan Engine Failure (0x80004005)
Hi Steve,
thanks for the work. A couple of questions for clarity's sake (as
sysadmin, not packager)
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 10:37:59PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> - Per-package /etc/pam.d/ configuration files should not include
> explicit 'password' blocks. Instead, services should us
At Thu, 21 Aug 2003 00:17:27 +1000,
Anthony Towns wrote:
> [1 ]
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 08:49:33AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:49:25PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > Also make sure to include some leg room if you depend on packages that
> > > have a tendency to
"Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > >
> > > > The only problem with that is the current failure to comply to policy,
> >
JÃrÃme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> JÃrÃme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Quoting Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
> No he wouldn't. FDL is about free documentation. :-)
Except it isn't :-)
>>>
>>>
Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 15:02, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Installing a new kernel package can be a bit of a pain, especially for
> > newbies, what with ha
Quoting Martin Quinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Of course, the signature is not sufficient to get the needed trust. But I'm
> coordinator of the french translation team since a few years, so my skills
> should be trustable, I guess.
>
> But the point is that without the key, anyone can forge mails
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003, Steve Langasek wrote:
> But descriptions can be deceiving. Does anyone use this package who
> could comment on its reliability? Does the lack of other bugs indicate
> that the software is mature and stable, or unused?
I am trying barrendero but don't trust it enough yet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 16:06, David Smith wrote:
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
> Content-Type: text/html;
[ dsmith_sig1.GIF]
people here tend to regard stuff like your mail as spam already ...
Uli
-BEGIN PGP
This is an automated response to your e-mail.
Your e-mail has been received
by the McCall Pattern Company:
Butterick,
McCall's and Vogue Patterns.
E-mail is answered in the order it i
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > Of course, I could (and have) uploaded my key on public servers, meaning
> > that other Debian member could check than a given mail with my address
> > desserve the trust they habitually give me. Bu
Russell Coker wrote:
It sounds like we need a propolice enabled GCC.
I have talked to Matthias Klose, one of the GCC maintainers, about this.
He included the patch so he could built ProPolice-enables packages of
gcc and g++ but he's currently too busy with other things. He might
accept a patch t
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>
> > Why not? Just block binary uploads completely, and let everything get
> > built by the buildds. I certainly plan to do that with my own uploads.
> > (I've already set up my own buildds).
> >
> > I'd go one
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 17:22:38 +1000, Anthony Towns
wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 08:56:31AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 15:16:05 +0200, Josef Spillner
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >- the KDE release plan might be delayed (as well...)
>> The sarge release plan _will_ be del
Xavier Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Russell Coker wrote:
> Major issues for a ro-/ are maybe:
> - using devfs for /dev (kernel 2.4 and package devfsd installed)
Alternatively you can copy /dev to a ramdisk.
And please don't use devfsd. That somewhat cancles out half of
Quoting "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This has been covered to death already. There are a sufficient number
> of respondents that see it as non-free. The RM's recent post indicates
> that possibly the FSF has even come around to the idea that their
> license is less than Free. Can w
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:37:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:34:12PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 15:49, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 11:44:22PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> > > > The negative effect for the use
* GOTO Masanori wrote:
> AFAIK, the unresolved difficult bugs are: (1) hppa build (2) dpkg
> (setjmp/longjmp) on sparc (3) NIS (will be fixed?) (4) misterious
> apache on ia64 bug. Note that (3) becomes ok to revert patches, (4)
> may be non-glibc bug. Well, they are still something hard work.
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Devfs is getting less support now, it might not be the best time to start
> depending on it.
Indeed, it's looking likely that GregKH's `udev' will replace devfs
sometime in the future.
[It was amusing to see Christoph Hellwig's recent patch on the lkml
Quoting Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> consensus
>n : agreement of the majority in sentiment or belief
>[syn: {general agreement}]
>
> unanimity
>n : everyone being of one mind
>
>
> A world of difference.
No, no, no! You don't get it. There
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: horde-sam
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : The Horde Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cvs.horde.org/cvs.php/sam/
* License : GPL
Description : Spamassassin module fo
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: phpdocumentor
Version : 1.2.2
Upstream Author : Joshua Eichorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.phpdocumentor.org/
* License : PHP
Description : php auto docum
From Netcraft newsletter and web site:
Debian Linux distribution 10 years old today
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2003/08/16/debian_linux_distribution_10_years_old_today.html
I'm not so sure about the value of their Debian geographical
distribution, maybe... :-)
bye
Christian
--
Christia
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-21
Followup-For: Bug #206536
As Thomas said, the right URL is http://www.phpdoc.org, not
http://www.phpdocumentor.org.
Thank you very much, Thomas.
Regards.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel:
Quoting Christian Surchi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> From Netcraft newsletter and web site:
>
> Debian Linux distribution 10 years old today
>
> http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2003/08/16/debian_linux_distribution_10_years_old_today.html
>
> I'm not so sure about the value of their Debian geographi
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:59:30AM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
> From Netcraft newsletter and web site:
>
> Debian Linux distribution 10 years old today
>
> http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2003/08/16/debian_linux_distribution_10_years_old_today.html
>
> I'm not so sure about the value of th
Hi
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:56:34PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:57:06PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > Who is interested in stack protection?
x86 only? Pro police is the most platform independent iirc.
> > I think it would be good to have some experiments of stack prot
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 19:13, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> However, ProPolice has not been ported to all architectures yet, see
> http://www.research.ibm.com/trl/projects/security/ssp/statuschart.html
> for details.
Not being ported to all architectures is not a problem IMHO.
Such stack protection should n
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: nicotine
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Hyriand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://nicotine.thegraveyard.org/
* License : GPL
Description : feature complete clien
On Thursday 21 August 2003 13:36, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I like "having a significant following in the former Iron Curtain
> countries". So the two major "former Iron Curtain" countries seem to
> be France and Germany.. :-)
Well, part of Germany was on the far side of the Iron Curtain regardl
* Goswin von Brederlow
| There is also another reason, not mentioned before, for source only
| uploads. It takes way less bandwith to upload a diff.gz+dsc file than
| to upload a big binary package.
Bandwidth has costs for buildds as well.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 05:52:32PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> AFAIK, the unresolved difficult bugs are: (1) hppa build (2) dpkg
> (setjmp/longjmp) on sparc (3) NIS (will be fixed?) (4) misterious
> apache on ia64 bug.
Is there a bug# for (2)? If not, could someone forward the appropriate
mai
cobaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2003-08-20 15:33, John Goerzen wrote:
> > tne pain of breaking desktops is no less when
> > you consider how many more desktops we're talking about here.
>
> that's assuming that all those desktops crash at the same time no?
No, it's assuming that all those
Citat Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting Christian Surchi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > From Netcraft newsletter and web site:
> >
> > Debian Linux distribution 10 years old today
> >
> >
>
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2003/08/16/debian_linux_distribution_10_years_old_today.html
>
> Who is interested in stack protection?
I am.
>I think it would be good to have some experiments of stack protected packages
>for Debian. Probably the best way to do this would be to start with
>ssh-stack and sysklogd-stack being uploaded to experimental. I don't have
>time to do this, but
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-19
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: livejournal
Version : 2003042200
Upstream Author : Brad Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.livejournal.com/code
* Lic
Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 19:13, Stefan Gybas wrote:
However, ProPolice has not been ported to all architectures yet, see
http://www.research.ibm.com/trl/projects/security/ssp/statuschart.html
for details.
Not being ported to all architectures is not a problem IMHO.
Such stack prote
Are we expecting the latest unstalble gcc compiler to correctly
compiler the kernel?
> gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.2 20030812 (Debian prerelease)
I'm getting a new error when I compile the kernel. In the structure
below, it doesn't like the declaration for slot_tablen complaining
that
id
Steve Langasek wrote:
> - It will now be possible to choose md5 vs. crypt passwords at install
> time without violating policy. (Currently, a number of conffiles are
> being modified by maintainer scripts in order to enable md5
> passwords.) Actually making this process policy-compliant wil
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 09:37:40AM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
> > gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 3.3.2 20030812 (Debian prerelease)
> I'm getting a new error when I compile the kernel. In the structure
> below, it doesn't like the declaration for slot_tablen complaining
> that
> ide-cd.h:440: err
> __u8 short slot_tablelen;
Isn't it just a plain error? Either it's a char, or it's a short. It
can't be both, right?
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
Op do 21-08-2003, om 09:49 schreef Russell Coker:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 17:39, Xavier Roche wrote:
> > Major issues for a ro-/ are maybe:
> > - using devfs for /dev (kernel 2.4 and package devfsd installed)
>
> Devfs is getting less support now, it might not be the best time to start
> depending
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:39:35AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>
> I am only realistic. When in history did a non-trivial software
> product meet its release schedule?
>
> I am surely hoping for the best, but I seriously do expect sarge to be
> released in early 2004. Which is a pretty good track re
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 07:16:46PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Devfs is getting less support now, it might not be the best time to start
> > depending on it.
>
> Indeed, it's looking likely that GregKH's `udev' will replace devfs
> sometime in the fut
> We musn't let the bigots decide for us! ;-)
Sorry, but that insult doesn't put a winksmiley on my face.
Please don't try to start a useless flamewar. They break
out so easily on their own. There is no need to discuss
this matter here; it has already been thoroughly discussed
in debian-legal an
On 21 Aug 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Doogie already said he wants to implement a smart comparator for deb
> in dpkg 2.0 which would then be used to compare that different builds
> of the binary-all even give the same result.
This means you give the 2 debs(which probably only differ by d
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 22:41, Brian May wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 07:16:46PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> > Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Devfs is getting less support now, it might not be the best time to
> > > start depending on it.
> >
> > Indeed, it's looking likely that Gr
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 05:52:32PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > AFAIK, the unresolved difficult bugs are: (1) hppa build (2) dpkg
> > (setjmp/longjmp) on sparc (3) NIS (will be fixed?) (4) misterious
> > apache on ia64 bug.
>
> Is there a bug# for (2
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:44:11PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > __u8 short slot_tablelen;
>
> Isn't it just a plain error? Either it's a char, or it's a short. It
> can't be both, right?
That's what I think, too. It looks, too, to be something added in a
patch because the indentation is dif
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Talk with the maintainer. Or NMU. Or make noise on -devel.
> But don't "fork" packages.
I agree and disagree. Talking with the maintainer works
sometimes. Sometimes one is in a position to NMU. Sometimes
it helps to make noise on debian-devel
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:53:12AM +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
FU> Dmitry Borodaenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
FU> libyaml-ruby1.8 (<- libyaml-ruby)
I think that since whytheluckystiff is developing Syck/YAML right in the
Ruby CVS, there is little chance for a separation of libyaml-ruby1.8 in
the ne
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:42:28AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > But descriptions can be deceiving. Does anyone use this package who
> > could comment on its reliability? Does the lack of other bugs indicate
> > that the software is mature and stable
Jérôme Marant dijo [Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:18:10PM +0200]:
> > consensus
> >n : agreement of the majority in sentiment or belief
> >[syn: {general agreement}]
> >
> > unanimity
> >n : everyone being of one mind
> >
> >
> > A world of difference.
>
> No, no, no!
* Martin Quinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 05:03:17PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > I doubt a poor translation would make it into a released version.
> A lot of poor translation get into stable, mainly by lack of manwork, but
> you are right no offending translation get
* Martin Quinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Judging from the amount of translation rotting in the BTS, I guess some of
> you guys react the same way, and I want to change this by easing this trust
> relationship, if possible.
Eh. Personally I tend to doubt it's lack of trust that's causing
tran
Christian Perrier dijo [Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:36:02PM +0200]:
> Wow.According to this chart, about a third of hosts running Debian
> are in France.. :-)
>
> For sure, several major web hosting and Internet Access Providers run
> Debian hosts for their key servers herebut I think this gr
On Aug 21, Xavier Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>- using devfs for /dev (kernel 2.4 and package devfsd installed)
devfs will probably disappear. It's better to look at udev (which I'm
packaging).
>- transforming several /etc files as symlinks and moving them to some
>other place (/var/etc ?
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 03:05:00PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> But sometimes there are fundamental disagreements about how something
> should be packaged and then it must be possible for two competing
> packages to exist in Debian
Says who?
Debian is not just a collection of packages, it's
Well, I know that in postinst and prerm, but when which argument is
passed?
I thought that "cd /var/lib/dpkg/info && grep -10 update-alternatives
*postinst|less -S"
would help me, but it did quite the contrary. There is a total mess!
A quick summary of how it is called in different packages:
- a
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:18:10PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> We musn't let the bigots decide for us! ;-)
Thanks for excusing yourself from the discussion thus.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Software engineering: that part of
Debian GNU/Linux | computer sci
Hi all,
The main goal of this party was to translate Debian package descriptions.
Unfortunately Gluck, where the ddts server is, was down quite a long
time and installing a local server was not so easy as it was the first
time I did this. The local server was up only a few minutes before Gluck
co
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 08:05:01PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> So, all mails sent to bugs with release-critical severities, including
> acknowledgements of control messages, will now be copied to a new
> list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Very nice!
--
Jamin W. Collins
To be nobody but yourself when
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:41:16PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > Indeed, it's looking likely that GregKH's `udev' will replace devfs
> > sometime in the future.
>
> Dare I ask the obvious question: what is udev? Why is it better then
> devfs?
It's mostly in user-space, lighter-weight, and more conf
I retain hope that this discussion can end in agreement on the
issue raised in #156161. Toward that end I offer the following
interpretation of what has been said and finally a proposal.
The original question was about how to prevent services from
being started. Some packages employ a mechanism
V I R U S A L E R T
Do not reply to this email, no human will read it!
Our email server viruschecker found the following virus(es)
or worm(s) in an email received from your system:
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The email was addressed to the following recipient(s):
-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The E-mai
The Advanced Virus Detection software on grnleafinc.com has reported that you
sent an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], containing the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
virus in the
your_details.pif attachment. The subject of the E-mail was "Re: Wicked
screensaver".
The E-mail containing the virus has been q
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 11:18, JÃrÃme Marant wrote:
> No, no, no! You don't get it. There may be a majority among the
> debian-legal zealots, but we need a consensus among Debian as a
> whole (which means voting of course).
>
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> We musn't let the bigots decide for us! ;-)
>
Jérôme Marant said:
> Quoting Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> consensus
>>n : agreement of the majority in sentiment or belief
>>[syn: {general agreement}]
>>
>> unanimity
>>n : everyone being of one mind
>>
>>
>> A world of difference.
>
> No, no,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:36:02PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> So the two major "former Iron Curtain" countries seem to be France and
> Germany.. :-)
Maybe they meant to say "Old Europe".
>8-)
/me goes to a priest to have the evil spirit of Donald Rumsfeld exorcised
--
G. Branden Robinso
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:39:00AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> I also like the idea of rebuilding packages with newer versions of
> their build-depends (or tool-chain) when a buildd is idle. That too
> would require a more automatic handling of maybe-successfull builds
> that won't be u
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:59:30AM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
> From Netcraft newsletter and web site:
>
> Debian Linux distribution 10 years old today
>
> http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2003/08/16/debian_linux_distribution_10_years_old_today.html
>
> I'm not so sure about the value of th
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 09:52, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> My concern is (1) hppa build. If we can't get hppa glibc, we may need
> to drop it finally...
I don't think the hppa glibc is as inscrutable as all that. The main
problem seems to be that Carlos is the only person working on the bug,
and he is
rintek wrote:
Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 19:13, Stefan Gybas wrote:
However, ProPolice has not been ported to all architectures yet, see
http://www.research.ibm.com/trl/projects/security/ssp/statuschart.html
for details.
Not being ported to all architectures is not a problem IMHO.
Su
On Wednesday, Aug 20, 2003, at 09:52 US/Eastern, Santiago Vila wrote:
Will we some day consider seriously the idea of autobuilders compiling
against testing those packages which do not need libraries from
unstable to be built?
If by "seriously consider" you mean "ignore all the arguments against
i
Le jeu 21/08/2003 à 09:33, Jérôme Marant a écrit :
> > According to debian-legal consensus.
>
> Is there any? John's message proves that there isn't any yet, IMO.
I have trouble with the concept of another "nonono gfdl is free because
there is free in the acronym" message affecting the consensus.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I plan on packaging raggle, a console RSS aggregator.
"Features include customizable keybindings, basic HTML rendering, HTTP proxy
support,
OPML import/export, themes, support for various versions of RSS, Screen
support. browser
auto-detection, and more. Raggle
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to package ncurses-ruby, which is a ruby extension for the ncurses C
library.
It is placed under the LGPL 2.1. It's required by raggle.
http://ncurses-ruby.berlios.de
--
Brian Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
System Administrator, Core Messaging Systems
I have hope that this discussion can end in agreement on the
issue raised in #156161. Toward that end I offer the following
interpretation of what has been said and finally ask whether
we can agree to implement the reinterpreted #156161.
The original question was about how to prevent services fro
*** DO NOT REPLY DIRECTLY TO THIS EMAIL ADDRESS ***
*** YOUR EMAIL WILL NOT BE DELIVERED OR READ ***
You sent an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Thank you!
This is an unmonitored email account and your mail
has been deleted from our system. If you require general
support, please email [
Hi!
grub-client is a distributed webcrawler client written in c++. The
biggest problem with it is that it simply doesn't work, and I don't grok
why. I'm not that familar with c++ and multithreading and don't know
where to look for the bug. Furthermore it seems that on the search
engine fr
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
