Quoting "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> This has been covered to death already.  There are a sufficient number
> of respondents that see it as non-free.  The RM's recent post indicates
> that possibly the FSF has even come around to the idea that their
> license is less than Free.  Can we please move along now?

Just don't read the thread.

-- 
Jérôme Marant


Reply via email to