Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Devfs is getting less support now, it might not be the best time to start > depending on it.
Indeed, it's looking likely that GregKH's `udev' will replace devfs sometime in the future. [It was amusing to see Christoph Hellwig's recent patch on the lkml changing devfs from `EXPERIMENTAL' directly to `OBSOLETE' (and he has a fairly good record of getting devfs patches accepted by Linus). :-/ ] -Miles -- Is it true that nothing can be known? If so how do we know this? -Woody Allen
