* Matthias Urlichs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > There is no shortage of opinions about what "we" should do, but there is
> > unlikely to be any action until an "I" arises who actually does the work.
> > This has been discussed over and over with the same result each
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:59:49PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> There are no mirrors of security.debian.org, and have not been for as long
> as I have been aware. See the security team FAQ.
deb http://mirror.pacific.net.au/debian-security/ stable/updates main
> Do you honestly think would be a
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:59:49PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman arranged a set of bits
into the following:
> There are no mirrors of security.debian.org, and have not been for as long
> as I have been aware. See the security team FAQ.
FALSE.
There are at least several mirrors. I myself use them as for
Manoj Srivastava wrote :
> On Tue, 13 May 2003 09:12:25 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Maintainers or developers do not have a say on how translations are
> > done except for gettext sintax errors. If you do not like how a
> > translation team works, but
Clay Crouch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My most humble apologies.
> It has become quite clear that the culture that the DD community
> shares has evolved in my absence. My absence disallowed me to
> evolve with it. The culture you now enjoy is not the one I left.
> I truly didn't expect to be at
On Thu, 15 May 2003 14:37, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Ahem. Your email wouls have to contain a few highly unlikely phrases to be
> classified as "uncertain" by me. FWIW, yours ends up as
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-42.6 required=5.0
Sorry, if you are only using that when spamassasin records it as
Joe Buck wrote:
> However, the output is redundant in many cases.
Fixed now.
--
Björn
对不起 打扰之处请见谅
本公司是一家专业致力于网络服务的专业性公司，提供高质空间，优质服务，为您建设网站提供必不可少的各类型空间及域名；
域名80元 送20个次级域名
标准主机空间 100M网站空间+100M邮局空间
可支持asp/php/cgi/access 可运行论坛程序200元/年
不论您是单位企业还是个人，我们都将竭诚为您提供贴身个性化的网络支持服务
同时本公司还推出网站建设服务，最低999元就可让您拥有包含：空间+域名+邮局+网页
的完整网站
同时为只需简单介绍各类信息的个人及企业提供网站简化模式――网络名片
最低只需100元/年
如果您在单位里不
On Wednesday 14 May 2003 16:05, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 02:24:25PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Usually this is controlled by the Content-Disposition: header.
> > "Content-Disposition: inline" should be displayed inline;
> > "Content-Disposition: attachment" will often be hidd
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 03:57:58PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 10:14:53AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> >I'm sorry, I am on a public terminal, and can't quite remember where I
> >read it - But testing should always be close to a releasable state.
>
> That assumption is both
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > This is, after all, more than just a herd of cats.
> How on earth did you get that quaint idea?
>From looking at Debian. It is far more structured, organised and controlled
than the great majority of free software projects out there.
> If you want a universally held fi
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 01:03:07PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2003 19:17:50 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 02:18:04AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> As a package developer I hold veto powers over anything
Hi, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> (a) Before I do something like that, I'd need to be accepted as DD.
>
> False statement.
So non-DDs can get accounts on Debian machines to setup something like
this (install FTP directories, setup autobuilders, etc.)?
If that's so, cool, I'll have free time in two we
Keegan Quinn wrote:
> Funny how myself and every admin I know have only very minor issues with
> running unstable. What, pray tell, makes it such an 'obvious' non-option
> for end users?
How about constantly repeated statements to the effect?
"So you did not even look at the release announcement
Hi, Stephen Frost wrote:
> honestly, if you care enough about what other people think to not take
> any action on your own chances are pretty good whatever you did wouldn't
> get very far anyway.
My approach is somewhat different. I freely admit that I'm fairly new to
Debian and probably have som
Hi, Chris Leishman wrote:
>> - If the build is successful, it's available for apt-getting from
>> testing-updates; otherwise the maintainer gets a helpful ;-) email.
>
> I'm just curious why the updates couldn't just go straight into testing
> itself. It's not as if the testing distribution is
Hello!
I was wondering how to improve mailcap system to become useful.
First step was to able mc use mailcap. Now, I want to make nautilus to
use mailcap. And I have a few questions.
1. Where nautilus (gnome2?) keeps info about mime types?
2. (more complicated) Does run-mailcap differs x and non
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:13:19PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:12:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Take the harden package, or create something similar: a package that
> > conflicts with all versions of packages with known security holes.
>
> Why not just /fix/ the hol
Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to all who replied to my recent question on this subject.
> Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> With glibc I'd use
>> iconv --from=SRC-ENCODING --to=DST-ENCODING//TRANSLIT
>> if it is acceptable to change the length of strings. This
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 10:51:42AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2003 09:14:20 -0400, Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > If that's the case, then maybe the testing distribution has outlived
> > its usefulness. But if people feel otherwise, then it would make
> > sens
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 03:19:02PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:59:49PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > There are no mirrors of security.debian.org, and have not been for as long
> > as I have been aware. See the security team FAQ.
>
> deb http://mirror.pacific.net.au
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 05:37:51PM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 May 2003 04:53 pm, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> > What's worse, saying testing is not for public use means there is _no_
> > place to get updates, since unstable is obviously not an option for end
> > users. This makes Debia
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:10:35AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:22:27AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 02:02:27PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > This is a far cry from ``Do not touch l10n files''.
> >
> > Hey, this was the subject, I had
Hello,
> # partimage
>
> Error: volume hedaer size != 512 (520)
> This version has been compiled with an uncompatible version of
> gcc.
I received this bug report (#193391) today and I cannot reproduce it on
i386. Looks like a problem on powerpc. I'm not very familiar with
powerpc.
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:17:50PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
[...]
> > As a package developer I hold veto powers over anything
> > shipped in my package, since it is my signature that goes with it,
> > and I am responsible for all bugs.
>
> You do hold upstream responsibl
Hi,
I just catched this conversation on the misc OpenBSD mailinglist.
Does this in any way afflict debian?
greets Uwe
--
X-Tec GmbH
Institute for Computer and Network Security
WWW : http://www.x-tec.de/
IPv6: http://www.ipv6.x-tec.de/
--- Begin Message ---
> I'd like to encourage the OpenBSD develo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: latex209
Version : 25.mar.1992
Upstream Author : Leslie Lamport
* URL or Web page :
ftp://ctan.tug.org/tex-archive/obsolete/macros/latex209/distribs/latex209.tar.gz
* License : Public Domain
Description : Commands and
Hi,
There is currently no consensus whether translated man pages should
be shipped along with original man pages or within manpages-xx packages.
Unfortunately this leads to conflicts when a translation is first
shipped by the latter, then incorporated into the former (e.g. when
it becomes part of
There must be some mistake :-m
Joey Hess dijo:
> Tor Slettnes
> mindi
> mondo
> smail
> xcdroast
> yard
> zmailer
> zmailer-ssl
These are Héctor García's and he is not MIA at all.
What happened?
--
I would rather starve than lose your accept
对不起 打扰之处请见谅
本公司是一家专业致力于网络服务的专业性公司，提供高质空间，优质服务，为您建设网站提供必不可少的各类型空间及域名；
域名80元 送20个次级域名
标准主机空间 100M网站空间+100M邮局空间
可支持asp/php/cgi/access 可运行论坛程序200元/年
不论您是单位企业还是个人，我们都将竭诚为您提供贴身个性化的网络支持服务
同时本公司还推出网站建设服务，最低999元就可让您拥有包含：空间+域名+邮局+网页
的完整网站
同时为只需简单介绍各类信息的个人及企业提供网站简化模式――网络名片
最低只需100元/年
如果您在单位里不
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:04:39AM +0200, mcINEK wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I was wondering how to improve mailcap system to become useful.
> First step was to able mc use mailcap. Now, I want to make nautilus to
> use mailcap. And I have a few questions.
>
> 1. Where nautilus (gnome2?) keeps info about
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:24:14AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is currently no consensus whether translated man pages should
> be shipped along with original man pages or within manpages-xx packages.
> Unfortunately this leads to conflicts when a translation is first
> shipped by t
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:24:14AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> There is currently no consensus whether translated man pages should
> be shipped along with original man pages or within manpages-xx packages.
> Unfortunately this leads to conflicts when a translation is first
> shipped by the latter
W liście z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 11:54, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
> If you already parsed mailcap into mc's configuration, you should've
> seen this (picking out a random one):
>
> application/vnd.sun.xml.draw; openoffice '%s'; edit=openoffice '%s';
> test=test "$DISPLAY" != "" ; description="Open
Sorry, my terminal was too small to check all the replies in the thread,
including Hector's himself 0:-)
Glad to see this clarified.
--
I would rather starve than lose your acceptance
.''`.My eyes will always show my empty soul
: :' :- Boy Sets Fire
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030514 15:42]:
> organization, though. Tollef, do you know if there'll be wireless base
> stations around or, will we be doing ad-hoc mode?)
yes, there will be wlan. not user about the mode of operation.
and there will also be some stationary pcs there.
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:09:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:13:19PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:12:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Take the harden package, or create something similar: a package that
> > > conflicts with all versions o
* Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-27 18:12]:
> Martin, while maintaining the archive, contacted me, because he wanted to
> remove the orpahaned ipchains-perl module. He noticed, that my fwctl is
> depending on it.
>
> So here is my question, is anybody willing to take over fwctl/ipch
Ok, I've been trying to stay out of this as much as possible, since I think
Denis' original post:
> > So I would like to ask developers not to edit l10n files (templates,
> > PO files, etc) themselves; if you believe that something goes wrong,
> > notify the translator or his translation team
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:11:03PM +0200, mcINEK wrote:
> W li?cie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 11:54, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
> > If you already parsed mailcap into mc's configuration, you should've
> > seen this (picking out a random one):
> >
> > application/vnd.sun.xml.draw; openoffice '%s'; edit=
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:03:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:09:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:13:19PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:12:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > > Take the harden package, or creat
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:03:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:09:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:13:19PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:12:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > > Take the harden package, or creat
W liście z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 13:00, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
> Here's your error: if you do that, it's not the user who can change his
> browser, but the system administrator. Those two are not always the
> same.
But, does it eliminate my soluton? As you wrote later, user always can
change /et
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:24:42PM +0200, mcINEK wrote:
> W li?cie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 13:00, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
> > Here's your error: if you do that, it's not the user who can change his
> > browser, but the system administrator. Those two are not always the
> > same.
>
> But, does it
W liście z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 13:30, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
> I really think it would be a bad idea to go the alternatives road here.
But why? Could you give me any reasons? I've said why yes, so you tell
why not ;]
> If you must, you could write a front-end that parses /etc/mailcap, and
> f
On Thu, 15 May 2003 12:11:03 +0200, mcINEK wrote:
[...]
> We see a conflict. It doesn't matter how many browser user installed,
> always will be run galeon (it's above so it's first - am I right?).
>
> The best solution, I think, is that galeon (mozilla, etc) shouldn't
> provide a /etc/mailcap rec
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:35:22PM +0200, mcINEK wrote:
> W li?cie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 13:30, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
> > I really think it would be a bad idea to go the alternatives road here.
>
> But why? Could you give me any reasons? I've said why yes, so you tell
> why not ;]
Alternativ
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:13:59AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:03:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:09:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:13:19PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:12:1
W liście z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 13:49, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
> Alternatives and mailcap are two different worlds. Please keep them
> separated.
OK, so leave alternatives.
> > It won't work, because the aren't any 'standards'. I don't have idea how
> > make x/non-x choice from mailcap. I REALL
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:04:14PM +0100, Thom May wrote:
> Ok, I've been trying to stay out of this as much as possible, since I think
> Denis' original post:
> > > So I would like to ask developers not to edit l10n files (templates,
> > > PO files, etc) themselves; if you believe that somethi
* Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:04:14PM +0100, Thom May wrote:
> > I'm also quite upset to see off hand insults - I've never claimed to "know
> > what a foreign language should look like", what we've asked is for a
> > rational explanation as to why when we
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 02:13:32PM +0200, mcINEK wrote:
> > > It won't work, because the aren't any 'standards'. I don't have idea how
> > > make x/non-x choice from mailcap. I REALLY think alternatives could be
> > > good.
> >
> > It's done in there, all over the place! There's a 'test' option, w
* Colin Watson
| (I'm not involved with the organization, though. Tollef, do you know
| if there'll be wireless base stations around or, will we be doing
| ad-hoc mode?)
The area is covered with WLANs already, but we'll have a few switches
for people who don't have wireless.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
W liście z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 14:30, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
> Uh. You can create such a tree in-memory, no? Parsing the file is not
> *that* hard.
Of course, I can. But I don't understand why don't improve BAD
mechanism. If sth is bad and doesn't pass our requests we should change
it. Is upda
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:26:35PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:13:59AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:03:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:09:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:13:1
On Thu, May 15, 2003, Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger wrote:
> I just catched this conversation on the misc OpenBSD mailinglist.
> Does this in any way afflict debian?
This subject has already been discussed forever on debian-legal. The
general consensus is that "without fee" does not mean "you may redis
* Matthias Urlichs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> >> (a) Before I do something like that, I'd need to be accepted as DD.
> >
> > False statement.
>
> So non-DDs can get accounts on Debian machines to setup something like
> this (install FTP directories, setup autobuild
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 05:37:51PM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote:
> Hmm. Funny how myself and every admin I know have only very minor issues
> with
> running unstable. What, pray tell, makes it such an 'obvious' non-option for
> end users? Well-timed unstable snapshots are often more 'stable' th
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:09:08AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> I think it is proper to include translated man pages with original man
> pages, and to use apt-localepurge (now) or dpkg exclusions (when they're
> implemented) if people are worried about space. My gut feeling is that
I believe this
Le jeu 15/05/2003 à 14:49, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
> The area is covered with WLANs already, but we'll have a few switches
> for people who don't have wireless.
Side question: will there be a few machines for people who can't bring a
laptop ?
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
:
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 02:46:34PM +0200, mcINEK wrote:
> W li?cie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 14:30, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
> > Uh. You can create such a tree in-memory, no? Parsing the file is not
> > *that* hard.
>
> Of course, I can. But I don't understand why don't improve BAD
> mechanism.
I f
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:52:26AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Matthias Urlichs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Hi, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >
> > >> (a) Before I do something like that, I'd need to be accepted as DD.
> > >
> > > False statement.
> >
> > So non-DDs can get accounts on Debian ma
On Thu, May 15, 2003, someone calling themselves "LapTop006" wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:59:49PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman arranged a set of
> bits into the following:
> > There are no mirrors of security.debian.org, and have not been for as long
> > as I have been aware. See the security te
W liście z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 15:23, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
> I fail to see why it would be bad. It's not perfect, but that's far from
> the same thing. Moreover, I think your ideas would make things worse,
> rather than better.
It's not perfect. Importand bugs are for me:
* doesn't allow to
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 07:32:55AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
> The situation is very different from the situation maintainer face with
> upstream code because in fact apt should be able to install l10n packages
> related to a given program package when it installs the program package.
> S
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:27:07PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
> >> so maybe it was actually only filed in my brain (which has no web
> >> interface) ...
>
> > We need a bug system for developer's brains.
>
> Agreed...
>
> $ mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -s "Misplacement of apostrophes"
> Package: do
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:25:56PM +0100, Thom May wrote:
> * Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:04:14PM +0100, Thom May wrote:
> > > I'm also quite upset to see off hand insults - I've never claimed to "know
> > > what a foreign language should look like", wha
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 03:35:33PM +0200, mcINEK wrote:
> W li?cie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 15:23, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
> > I fail to see why it would be bad. It's not perfect, but that's far from
> > the same thing. Moreover, I think your ideas would make things worse,
> > rather than better.
>
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 03:19:02PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 11:59:49PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Do you honestly think would be a good idea to use testing-security this way
> > on a continual basis?
>
> Yes, I do. I think we should release DSA's for security
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 05:53:50PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Manoj's answer, while witty, is closer to the mark than you may
> realize.
>
> Debian will always be for whoever the people contributing to Debian
> are willing/want it to be for. No more, no less.
Um, when we all agreed to be Debia
W liście z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 15:42, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
> Yes it does. Create a ~/.mailcap with the application of your choice for
> a given MIME-type at the top.
>
> My suggestion of a front-end was to create some application that would
> help $USER to manage ~/.mailcap.
I think it's go
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 05:37:51PM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote:
>
> Sure, every now and then a badly-broken package makes it in for a
> day or two. This seems to be far less harmful than the massive
> headache that treating 'testing' as a usable release seems to be
> causing.
Something that would
Hi all
Currently we have both OpenMosix and Mosix in our main archive.
See http://openmosix.sourceforge.net/ and http://www.mosix.com/
for background information. Both software provide the same
features for clustering (but IMHO OpenMosix is more actively developed
and has more prospectives, e.g.
On 14 May 2003, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > I would recommend this. When I was in Bordeaux in 2000 without my own
> > Laptop
> > it was much less fun. :-( The educational effect decreases drastically!
> Well, that sould definatly interesting. I just hope I manage to get a
> laptop 'till then. O
Hi,
Sven Luther wrote:
> You again forget that debian is not x86 only, or do you expect Matthias
> to have access to machines of all the supported arches ?
>
Right.
Besides, I don't want to do this on my own, I want to do this as part of
Debian. I don't yet know enough about the setup of testing
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 04:05:28PM +0200, mcINEK wrote:
> > Please point me to where I said we should leave things as they are.
> You didn't say that, but you want use *minimal* solution, which aren't
> always good.
>
> PS1. Windows are done this way. MS created took w2k and sticked
> more,more an
On Tue 13 May 2003, James Troup wrote:
> Of the 191 pings were sent out:
> o 34 people's ping bounced[1].
> o 28 people replied asking to be retired.
> o 29 people replied with various different responses.
> o 10 people replied who were active.
> o 90 people didn't reply within the 2 month de
"Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Q: is content-disposition handled properly, especially for
> messag/rfc822 type attachments? (Or if not, are message attachments
> displayed inline by default?)
Gnus: yes (since 5.8.0, the first MIME-aware version)
> (Y
W liście z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 16:38, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
> What's that supposed to mean? Doing that does have its advantages, too
> (such as "you don't have to re-integrate everything with the new
> system").
>
> Granted, pushing that to extremes will end you up with an unworkable
> system
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 10:19:08AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > >If unstable has a fix for the bug, then it is a waste of time to work on
> > >testing because users can just upgrade. If unstable does not have a fix
> > >for the bug, then it is still a waste of time because unstable needs to
>
Hi, Sergio Rua wrote:
>> # partimage
>>
>> Error: volume hedaer size != 512 (520)
>> This version has been compiled with an uncompatible version of
>> gcc.
>
I'll check. Sergio: Which source package from where, please?
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAI
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:08:03AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 05:37:51PM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote:
> >
> > Sure, every now and then a badly-broken package makes it in for a
> > day or two. This seems to be far less harmful than the massive
> > headache that treating 't
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:08:03AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 05:37:51PM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote:
> >
> > Sure, every now and then a badly-broken package makes it in for a
> > day or two. This seems to be far less harmful than the massive
> > headache that treating 't
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:08:03AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> package to re-install. If you're not a developer, you don't have
> access to archives, so your choice is to either go back to the stable
> or testing version of the package, or try to find a mirror that still
With the pool system t
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 04:53:32PM +0200, mcINEK wrote:
> W li?cie z czw, 15-05-2003, godz. 16:38, Wouter Verhelst pisze:
> > What's that supposed to mean? Doing that does have its advantages, too
> > (such as "you don't have to re-integrate everything with the new
> > system").
> >
> > Granted,
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 06:15:07PM +0900, TSUCHIYA Masatoshi wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: latex209
> Version : 25.mar.1992
> Upstream Author : Leslie Lamport
> * URL or Web page :
> ftp://ctan.tug.org/tex-archive/obsolete/macros/latex209/distribs
Hi, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:26:35PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> No, it's sitting there, waiting for someone to use it. After a year's
>> neglect it might need some metaphorical oil on its hinges and some
>> dusting, but it really is there. I'm not just saying this for
>>
Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> In that case, I invite any maintainer with a security fix for their package
> in 'testing' to upload it to testing for testing-proposed-updates. Problem
> solved. Are you the one who will be responsible for reviewing the
> packages?
testing, in the absence of a freez
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:52:26AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Matthias Urlichs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > Hi, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > >
> > > >> (a) Before I do something like that, I'd need to be accepted as DD.
> > > >
> > > > False state
Hi, Sven Luther wrote:
> [...] and gave the impression that testing was more
> stable/secure/preferable/whatever to unstable [...]
That was my first impression too.
> I don't say that what you say is wrong, just that people are not aware
> of it, because we did tell them differently back then.
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 04:22:30AM -0700, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:03:06PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 08:09:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 01:13:19PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 07:12
* Matthias Urlichs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > You again forget that debian is not x86 only, or do you expect Matthias
> > to have access to machines of all the supported arches ?
> >
> Right.
Wrong, as I pointed out in my other message.
> Besides, I don't want to do this
* Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-05-15 16:44]:
> It's about bugs in mrtg that caused me to look for him.
> It may be necessary to hijack his packages if he is in fact MIA.
mj:
2003-03-21: Contact
2003-03-22: NMU by schepler: wmmatrix
2003-03-23: willfix
I didn't check yet whe
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:09:08AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:24:14AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > There is currently no consensus whether translated man pages should
> > be shipped along with original man pages or within manpages-xx packages.
> > Unfortunately this
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:47:34AM -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
> "Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > (Yes, I've stopped caring about users of a certain other widespread MUA, as
> > you've probably guessed anyway when you notice me using PGP/MIME to sign
> > messa
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:08:03AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 05:37:51PM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote:
> >
> > Sure, every now and then a badly-broken package makes it in for a
> > day or two. This seems to be far less harmful than the massive
> > headache that treating 't
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 04:16:39PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > You again forget that debian is not x86 only, or do you expect Matthias
> > to have access to machines of all the supported arches ?
> >
> Right.
>
> Besides, I don't want to do this on my own, I wa
I compiled and ran the debian kernel-source-2.5.69 package. It boots OK,
however, none of he modutil functions work. I keep getting the following
error message: "QM_MODULES: Function not implemented" whenever I try things
such as insmod, lsmod, or depmod. I suspect the source for this was o
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 10:47:34AM -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
> "Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Q: is content-disposition handled properly, especially for
> > messag/rfc822 type attachments? (Or if not, are message attachments
> > displayed inline by defaul
Hi, Steve Langasek wrote:
> If none of the people who are in a
> position to approve packages for inclusion in testing or
> testing-security are willing to commit resources to doing so
... or if the process is (or can be) sufficiently automated that the
general case doesn't need any human interve
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
