On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 05:37:51PM -0700, Keegan Quinn wrote: > On Wednesday 14 May 2003 04:53 pm, Björn Stenberg wrote: > > What's worse, saying testing is not for public use means there is _no_ > > place to get updates, since unstable is obviously not an option for end > > users. This makes Debian the only linux distribution I know of that > > completely eschews software updates between frozen releases (except for > > security fixes). > > Hmm. Funny how myself and every admin I know have only very minor issues > with > running unstable. What, pray tell, makes it such an 'obvious' non-option for > end users? Well-timed unstable snapshots are often more 'stable' than > commercial Linux releases, in my limited experience.
Because we give them the impression that testing is more adapted to them than unstable. Friendly, Sven Luther
