On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 23:08:08 +1200, Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 08/06/05, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [Nigel Jones]
>> > if "coreutils" is made absolutely dependant on libselinux1, then
>> > the user gets no choice...
>>
>> One think is depending on the librar
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:44:30PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> It's been implied that people will be basicly *forced* to use selinux,
wrong. completely wrong.
in the debian kernel builds (as arranged i believe by
manoj), the default option for the selinux kernel module is
"selinux=0".
that
Le jeudi 09 juin 2005 à 17:43 +1200, Nigel Jones a écrit :
> > Did you know that all Debian kernels now have SELinux compiled in?
> Yeah, thankfully, I build my own kernels...
It seems that for many people, building your own kernel is still
considered as a proof of virility. Great.
> >
On 09/06/05, Manoj Srivastava va, manoj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:44:30 +1200, Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > It's been implied that people will be basicly *forced* to use
> > selinux,
>
> Where on earth did you get that idea? The goal is to make it
>
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:44:30 +1200, Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> It's been implied that people will be basicly *forced* to use
> selinux,
Where on earth did you get that idea? The goal is to make it
_feasible_ for people to run SELinux on Etch by configuring boot
> so couldn
ired" package?
>> >
>> > the possibility of having debian/selinux is totally dependent on
>> > this one thing happening.
>> >
>> > no libselinux1="Required", no debian/selinux [all dependent
>> > packages e.g. coreutils
* Thijs Kinkhorst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, June 8, 2005 12:50, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > In RedHat, using selinux is a run time option. If one don't want to use
> it,
> > all one need to do is update a config file and reboot. I'm sure can get
> > something similar working in Debi
On Wed, June 8, 2005 12:50, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> In RedHat, using selinux is a run time option. If one don't want to use
it,
> all one need to do is update a config file and reboot. I'm sure can get
> something similar working in Debian.
If it's not necessary for basic operation of the p
* Nigel Jones
| Hmmm, I can see your point, BUT, if a user is not going to use selinux
| at all, then what is the use of downloading extra dependencies that
| you don't need. I thought that a feature of APT was that it makes you
| only download the libraries that you need/use.
Yes, and coreutil
On 08/06/05, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Nigel Jones]
> > if "coreutils" is made absolutely dependant on libselinux1, then the
> > user gets no choice...
>
> One think is depending on the library, another is actually using
> selinux. Your objection to use selinux might have
[Nigel Jones]
> if "coreutils" is made absolutely dependant on libselinux1, then the
> user gets no choice...
One think is depending on the library, another is actually using
selinux. Your objection to use selinux might have some merit, but
your objection to have a package depend on libselinux1 d
It's been implied that people will be basicly *forced* to use selinux,
so couldn't it be easier to have a coreutils-selinux package on the
side? just like how the kernel team maintain a couple different
branches of the kernel at the same time. There are people that
*REFUSE* to use selinux (persona
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:56:17PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > last time i spoke to him [name forgotten] the maintainer
> > of coreutils would not accept the coreutils patches -
> > already completed and demonstrated as working and
* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> last time i spoke to him [name forgotten] the maintainer
> of coreutils would not accept the coreutils patches -
> already completed and demonstrated as working and sitting on
> http://selinux.lemuria.org/newselinux - because libselinu
> > on this one thing happening.
> >
> > no libselinux1="Required", no debian/selinux [all dependent packages
> > e.g. coreutils will be "policy violations"].
>
> Uhhh, it's the other way around. Get coreutils to Depend on libselinux1
> and it'll
* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050607 02:01]:
> any progress on making libselinux1 a "Required" package?
>
> the possibility of having debian/selinux is totally dependent
> on this one thing happening.
>
> no libselinux1="Required", no
* Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> any progress on making libselinux1 a "Required" package?
>
> the possibility of having debian/selinux is totally dependent
> on this one thing happening.
>
> no libselinux1="Required", no debian
hi,
any progress on making libselinux1 a "Required" package?
the possibility of having debian/selinux is totally dependent
on this one thing happening.
no libselinux1="Required", no debian/selinux [all dependent packages
e.g. coreutils will be "policy violations"
18 matches
Mail list logo
