On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:44:30 +1200, Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> It's been implied that people will be basicly *forced* to use
> selinux,
Where on earth did you get that idea? The goal is to make it
_feasible_ for people to run SELinux on Etch by configuring boot
> so couldn't it be easier to have a coreutils-selinux
> package on the side?
Since the original premise was flawed, this would just add to
package bloat.
> just like how the kernel team maintain a couple different branches
> of the kernel at the same time. There are people that *REFUSE* to
> use selinux (personal/political/etc... reasons), if "coreutils" is
> made absolutely dependant on libselinux1, then the user gets no
> choice...
Did you know that all Debian kernels now have SELinux compiled in?
> Personally, I am one of the above. Sadly however there is becoming
> a lack of distributions that provide such a choice.
Well, you can keep your box security free for as long as you want.
manoj
--
I find you lack of faith in the forth dithturbing. Darse ("Darth")
Vader
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
