On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 08:24:31PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > any progress on making libselinux1 a "Required" package? > > > > the possibility of having debian/selinux is totally dependent > > on this one thing happening. > > > > no libselinux1="Required", no debian/selinux [all dependent packages > > e.g. coreutils will be "policy violations"]. > > Uhhh, it's the other way around. Get coreutils to Depend on libselinux1 > and it'll be brought up to Required. You don't get the library > "Required" first, having a library be "Required" but nothing "Required" > actually depending on it is senseless. last time i spoke to him [name forgotten] the maintainer of coreutils would not accept the coreutils patches - already completed and demonstrated as working and sitting on http://selinux.lemuria.org/newselinux - because libselinux1 is not a "Required" package, and could not be made a "Required" package because of the sarge freeze.
either way i don't particularly care. well - the bit i care about is that libselinux1 should have been made "Required" some time well over a year ago. l. -- -- <a href="http://lkcl.net";>http://lkcl.net</a> -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
