On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 10:15:53PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> On 15-09-2023 21:54, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > armel != armhf
> Of course
> > and nobody should be running armel on a NEON-capable CPU...
> Not sure why you say it like that, I guess you don't meen CI purposes here.
I m
On Fri, Sep 15 2023 at 03:00:05 PM -04:00:00, Andres Salomon
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15 2023 at 08:30:20 PM +02:00:00, Paul Gevers
wrote:
Hi,
On 15-09-2023 17:52, Andres Salomon wrote:
Any thoughts on this?
Please be aware of bug #1036818 [1]. Currently /proc/cpuinfo is
empty on
armel ci.
Hi Steve,
On 15-09-2023 21:54, Steve Langasek wrote:
armel != armhf
Of course
and nobody should be running armel on a NEON-capable CPU...
Not sure why you say it like that, I guess you don't meen CI purposes
here. But anyways, it seems that also the arm64 host that runs our armel
and arm
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 08:30:20PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
> On 15-09-2023 17:52, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > Any thoughts on this?
> Please be aware of bug #1036818 [1]. Currently /proc/cpuinfo is empty on
> armel ci.debian.net workers. (I'm failing to spot neon in the list of
> features of
On Fri, Sep 15 2023 at 08:30:20 PM +02:00:00, Paul Gevers
wrote:
Hi,
On 15-09-2023 17:52, Andres Salomon wrote:
Any thoughts on this?
Please be aware of bug #1036818 [1]. Currently /proc/cpuinfo is empty
on
armel ci.debian.net workers. (I'm failing to spot neon in the list of
features of
Hi,
On 15-09-2023 17:52, Andres Salomon wrote:
Any thoughts on this?
Please be aware of bug #1036818 [1]. Currently /proc/cpuinfo is empty on
armel ci.debian.net workers. (I'm failing to spot neon in the list of
features of that machine.)
Paul
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
- Original Message -
> From: "Paul Tagliamonte"
> To: "Andres Salomon"
> Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, "Timothy Pearson"
> , debian...@lists.debian.org
> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2023 11:29:56 AM
> Subject: Re: armhf NEON exce
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 12:18 PM Andres Salomon wrote:
> So my proposal for chromium is this:
> a) Enable NEON for chromium's armhf build.
> b) Add a check in debian/rules for 'neon' in /proc/cpuinfo's Features: line,
> and fail to build if NEON is not present. This should ensure that any buildds
> "Andres" == Andres Salomon writes:
Andres> Any thoughts on this? Please explicitly Cc me on replies, as
Andres> I'm not subscribed to any of the lists.
Makes sense to me.
Hi,
The latest chromium is failing to build on armhf because upstream broke
non-NEON builds. While that is technically an upstream bug, I'm not
sure upstream is going to care enough to even accept a patch to fix it.
I understand that the baseline for the armhf architecture is to not
support N
10 matches
Mail list logo
