On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 10:15:53PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Steve,
> On 15-09-2023 21:54, Steve Langasek wrote: > > armel != armhf > Of course > > and nobody should be running armel on a NEON-capable CPU... > Not sure why you say it like that, I guess you don't meen CI purposes here. I mean "no user should be choosing armel as the architecture for software to run on a NEON-capable machine". CI is something different. > But anyways, it seems that also the arm64 host that runs our armel and armhf > VM's doesn't have NEON in the feature list. That sounds like a bug then since NEON is a required part of the ARMv8-A ISA.[1] -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org [1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/102525/0100/Compiling-for-Neon-with-Arm-Compiler-6
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
