On 2023-10-26 Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2023-10-26 02:03:49 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
[...]
> Hmm... This seems to be due to a bug in the BTS when the bug was
> reopened for stable. At
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051563#25
> "Bug reopened Request was from Antonio
El 26/10/23 a las 2:11, Vincent Lefevre escribió:
This seems to be due to a bug in the BTS
[...]
Hello. This is a bug or a feature depending on how you look at it.
Reopening a bug is known to clear the version on which it was closed
(I think this normally makes sense and the cases where it doe
On 2023-10-26 02:03:49 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/mutt that mutt was
> removed from testing on 2023-10-25, with a link to
>
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/1473564/mutt-removed-from-testing/
>
> which says:
>
> ---
hi
On 06/24/2016 05:32 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:59:00PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> * Holger Levsen , 2016-06-24, 09:05:
I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz.
>>> I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say
>>> tha
* Adam Borowski , 2016-06-24, 17:32:
I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to
say that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's from the
authors initials, but… to me it sounds like "mutt-hitler" or probably
worse.
Send complaints to Karel's parents...
Eve
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:59:00PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Holger Levsen , 2016-06-24, 09:05:
> >>I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz.
> >I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say
> >that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's fr
* Holger Levsen , 2016-06-24, 09:05:
I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz.
I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say
that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's from the
authors initials, but… to me it sounds like "mutt-hitler" or
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 07:33:40AM -0300, Tiago Ilieve wrote:
> His package is in the archive for over two years[3] and
> looks like no one felt offended enough to fill a bug before.
I only noticed mutt-kz three months ago…
And I'd also be fine with a rename to mutt-karel or mutt-karel-zak.
-
Holger,
On 24 June 2016 at 06:05, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say
> that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I know it's from the authors
> initials, but… to me it sounds like "mutt-hitler" or probably worse.
Wait... What? So are
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:05:16AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> And I don't think this is a german thing (well…) - the term "KZ" is
> known by millions of non german speaking people, cause their loved ones
> suffered and died there.
s#non german speaking people#non german speaking and german spea
Hi Victor,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:30:16AM +0200, Víctor M. Jáquez L. wrote:
> I'm sorry, I didn't know. Thanks.
> The name comes from the main author of the project: Karel Zak.
[...]
> Independently of the badly chosen name, I accepted to deprecate mutt-kz in
> favor or neomutt.
wow, very coo
On 06/24/16 at 09:05am, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:44:18AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> > I am suggesting that I remember what happened with mutt-kz.
>
> I have no idea what you are referring to here, but it reminds me to say
> that I think the name "mutt-kz" is a NO-GO. I kn
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 04:37:53AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> I need help with:
> - classifying and forwarding upstream open bugs
> - eventually packaging the mutt CVS tree, as the author has not made any
> new snapshots in the last months
I could co-maintain mutt if only after sept the 5th. I
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 04:37:53AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> - eventually packaging the mutt CVS tree, as the author has not made any
> new snapshots in the last months
He doesn't seem to be committing much, either. A patch I sent was
repeatedly ignored.
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 12:17:07PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> What do the columns in slabinfo mean?
Umm, you can read the meaning in the source. There is an interesting
additional profile option where ou can actually see the nuber of use of the
slab cache. (turn on CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB or only #define
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I have configured "mutt -y" so it returns a list of a number of
> Maildirs, and noticed something strange in performance.
...
> I have tried restarting the LDAP server, but this doesn't help.
Are you running nscd?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 03:05:28AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Perhaps it is just a dcache problem. Perhaps you can see anything in
> /proc/slabinfo or you could try to run find first? Could be that memory is
What do the columns in slabinfo mean?
> filled up and therefore the cache for the di
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 09:17:34AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> At one stage, I thought it might be related to the speed of my LDAP
> server (the problem goes away if I remove it from nsswitch.conf),
> however, I can't see any evidence that the LDAP server
> (localhost) is slowing down.
Perhaps it is
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 11:00:58AM -0900, Christopher S. Swingley wrote:
> > A quick search of the debian-devel archive didn't turn up
> > anything about this, but I might have goofed the search.
> > Anyway, mutt-1.3.24-2 works well enough for me, but 1.3.24-3
> > won't let me modify /var/mail/foo.
> A quick search of the debian-devel archive didn't turn up
> anything about this, but I might have goofed the search.
> Anyway, mutt-1.3.24-2 works well enough for me, but 1.3.24-3
> won't let me modify /var/mail/foo.
# chown root:mail /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock
# chmod 2755 /usr/bin/mutt_dotl
On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 09:42:54AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Marco writes:
> > Look like there is consensus to move mutt-i to main. In the next days I
> > will upload it along with some fixes.
>
> Do you think we should check with ME first? While I don't believe he is at
> any risk of pr
Marco writes:
> Look like there is consensus to move mutt-i to main. In the next days I
> will upload it along with some fixes.
Do you think we should check with ME first? While I don't believe he is at
any risk of prosecution, we should respect his wishes.
We should also consider moving any ot
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 02:10:52PM +0200, Michael Dietrich wrote:
> why is mutt compiled without pgp-support as default?
Because of US export restrictions on software containing cryptographic code.
The version that's available from ftp.debian.org and its mirrors ("mutt") is
compiled without PGP s
23 matches
Mail list logo
