On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 06:53:29PM +0100, Davide Prina wrote:
> * some packages are in T and P but with different versions (libace-6.0.1);
> * some packages have more versions in T than in P (eog-plugins);
I can not confirm these two specific packages. However, the importer of
translations into U
On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 18:53 +0100, Davide Prina wrote:
> Packages (P) and Translation-en (T) have some differences, I don't
> understand that there are correct:
> * some packages are in P, but not in T (today I don't found one);
> * some packages are in T, but not in P (lib32z1);
Which architectu
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 06:53:29PM +0100, Davide Prina wrote:
> >I support the dak change to split off the long descriptions into their
> >own files.
>
> Packages (P) and Translation-en (T) have some differences, I don't
> understand that there are correct:
> * some packages are in P, but not in T
Hi Ian,
On 21/02/2012 15:30, Ian Jackson wrote:
I support the dak change to split off the long descriptions into their
own files.
Packages (P) and Translation-en (T) have some differences, I don't
understand that there are correct:
* some packages are in P, but not in T (today I don't found
Quoting Davide Prina (davide.pr...@gmail.com):
> the DDTSS is totally broken :-(
When this change happened, I somehow secretly expected someone to step
up and try fixing the DDT* things. I have to say that I personnally
never anticipated the consequences of the change, even if I had been
warned t
Davide Prina writes ("Re: Description-less Packages indices"):
> the DDTSS is totally broken :-(
Well, I don't know anything about "DDTSS". I don't know what it is,
at all, and I have never been involved in the translation effort. But
I do think I understand
On 19/02/2012 22:38, Joe Dalton wrote:
Martin Eberhard Schauer writes:
The changes have ill side-effects:
- DDTP/DDTSS is partially broken (1). The Database has $(nr_of_packages)
new entrys since 01-22 containing just the short description.
the DDTSS is totally broken :-(
No new tra
Martin Eberhard Schauer writes:
> The changes have ill side-effects:
> - DDTP/DDTSS is partially broken (1). The Database has $(nr_of_packages)
>new entrys since 01-22 containing just the short description.
> - These (untranslated) one-liners is what one gets visiting (2), e.g. (3).
> - Th
Martin Eberhard Schauer wrote:
The changes have ill side-effects:
[...]
- These (untranslated) one-liners is what one gets visiting (2), e.g. (3).
Oh-oh. This was reported as #657557:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657557
- There are no new Translation-xx files (4).
Co
The changes have ill side-effects:
- DDTP/DDTSS is partially broken (1). The Database has $(nr_of_packages)
new entrys since 01-22 containing just the short description.
- These (untranslated) one-liners is what one gets visiting (2), e.g. (3).
- There are no new Translation-xx files (4).
-
On 2012-01-22 14:28, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Filipus Klutiero (22/01/2012):
am I missing something? The main i386 Packages.bz2 in both dists and
newdists still seems to weigh 8 MB:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/newdists/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/
http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/bi
Filipus Klutiero (22/01/2012):
> am I missing something? The main i386 Packages.bz2 in both dists and
> newdists still seems to weigh 8 MB:
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/newdists/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/
> http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/
The former is symlinked to
Hi archive team,
On 2012-01-22 11:08, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Hi,
as announced earlier[1] we have just changed dak to only include the
short description in the Packages indices for the testing, unstable,
experimental, p-u and testing-p-u suites. The full description can be
retrieved from the T
13 matches
Mail list logo
