On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 18:53 +0100, Davide Prina wrote: > Packages (P) and Translation-en (T) have some differences, I don't > understand that there are correct: > * some packages are in P, but not in T (today I don't found one); > * some packages are in T, but not in P (lib32z1);
Which architecture and suite are you looking at the packages file for? lib32z1 only exists on amd64 and kfreebsd-amd64, so if you're using another architecture then it's not surprising that it's not included. > * some packages are in T and P but with different versions (libace-6.0.1); I'm a little confused here. The translation file only contains one stanza for libace-6.0.1. In sid the binary package only exists on armel, so if you're looking at other architectures then it won't be present in the packages file. > * some packages have more versions in T than in P (eog-plugins); In the case of eog-plugins, it looks like all of the long descriptions are basically the same but have the list of plugins ordered differently. There are 10 stanzas in the translation file and the package is built on 11 architectures. I haven't checked the package but my guess would be that the plugin list in the description is generated during the binary package build and nothing ensures ordering of that list. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1331403828.24969.27.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
