e you compared the build logs, especially the configure-like step
where CMake examines the environment and looks for various syscalls,
functions, etc, to see if there were differences between the schroot
and unshare backend builds?
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@deb
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 12:44:47AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 10:46:23PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 11:22:50PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > > > I am among the people who have moved towards the Sequoia family of
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 10:46:23PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 11:22:50PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > > I am among the people who have moved towards the Sequoia family of
> > > cryptographic tools; in particular, sqop (a Sequoia implementa
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 11:05:11PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 07:45:12PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Dear Debian developpers,
> >
> > popularity-contest relies on /usr/bin/gpg for encrypting files.
> > (it cannot use gpgv which
rypted data [sym alg is specified in pub-key encrypted session
key]
(plain text + MDC SHA1(20 bytes))
[roam@straylight ~]$
Hope that helps!
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org pe...@morpheusly.com
PGP key:https://www.ringlet
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 02:59:16PM +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 at 14:35, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 10:19:34AM +0100, Julien Plissonneau Duquène wrote:
> > > Le 2025-01-07 21:52, Peter Pentchev a écrit :
> > > >
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 10:19:34AM +0100, Julien Plissonneau Duquène wrote:
> Le 2025-01-07 21:52, Peter Pentchev a écrit :
> >
> > Hm. That sounds interesting, but I think the Debian project cannot
> > protect such a mirror from automatically bringing in non-DFSG content
&g
An automatic mirror cannot do that.
(and no, even if one says "well the responsibility is on the developer who
first marked that remote repo for mirroring", no, I don't think there is
a way that developer can know that, two weeks later, somebody will push
bad stuff there)
G
uestion is really about reprepro, then take a look at
the "Contents" option in the definition of a distribution
(the conf/distributions file); putting "Contents:" on a line by
itself will make reprepro generate the files.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 11:01:43PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 07:00:36PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 10:08:19AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 12:22:38PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > &g
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 07:00:36PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 10:08:19AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 12:22:38PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > They are planning to remove the --badname option from useradd, making
> >
's not actually essential for adding a user. If you don't like the policy
> that useradd sets...just don't use it.
In the context of the whole thread, are you suggesting that adduser(1)
should be changed to use something other than useradd(8) under the hood?
G'luck,
P
ll-time DD who often wishes he would
allocate more time to help with Rust packaging in Debian: go for it.
(not sure if you were actually asking for lurkers to pipe in;
thought I would on the off chance of "everyone who agrees is silent")
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ri
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 . _ -
The last three characters are the , , and
characters, respectively.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org pe...@morpheusly.com
PGP key:https://www.ringlet.net/roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
s for your desire to make working on Debian easier and
better!
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org pe...@morpheusly.com
PGP key:https://www.ringlet.net/roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
k, except for
the low chance of anybody having a 1.14-7+something local version.
Still, I thought I'd mention this for the more general case.
And thanks for holding this discussion in the first place!
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org pe...@morpheusly.com
yping, and I do use it for some local
projects, but unfortunately I don't think it will ever gain the popularity
it deserves)
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org pe...@morpheusly.com
PGP key:https://www.ringlet.net/roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Zutils is a collection of utilities for dealing with any combination
> > of compressed and non-compressed files transparently. Currently the
> > supported compressors are gzip, bzip2, lzip, xz, and zstd.
There are also acat in the atool package, and bsdcat in
the libarchive-tools package.
G
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Pentchev
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, team+pyt...@tracker.debian.org,
r...@debian.org
* Package name: python-test-tunnel
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Contact: Peter Pentchev
* URL : https://devel.ringlet.net
$dirname: $!\n";
say "locked, it seems";
sleep(3600);'
I only put the sleep() part so I could check using lsof that
the directory was indeed locked. And yeah, the v5.10 part is a leftover
from the days (...until a month or two ago...) when I still had to
support st
ty,
default "yes", so that it is activated on new automatically installed
systems, but people who upgrade their current Debian installations can
choose to keep the old behavior?
I do realize that more debconf prompts are not always desirable, and
such decisions must be taken on a case-by-cas
that not what "the second countermeasure" part was?
If a first commit has ever been pushed, the second one would not
be "visible".
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.ke
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 10:40:51AM +, Traut Manuel LCPF-CH wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 05:02:29PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 03:25:01PM +0100, Manuel Traut wrote:
> >>> On 7 Feb 2024, at 18:27, Dima Kogan wrote:
>
umbrella.
>
> What's the problem with
>
> nc -lp 80 > file
>
> ?
>
> Does this provide some sort of browser interface?
To start with, raven seems to allow uploading more than one file :)
The description on the project homepage lists several features such as
access
g *all* of these problems and making sure none of the libraries that
might cause them ever migrates to testing - this is the whole point.
So yeah, thanks a lot to the drivers of this transition, to the Release Team,
and to DDs (porters and otherwise) who help with that! IMHO, it is goi
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 05:02:29PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 03:25:01PM +0100, Manuel Traut wrote:
> > Hi Dima,
> >
> > > On 7 Feb 2024, at 18:27, Dima Kogan wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi. Thanks for your contribution. I looked at
four bytes to the kernel - and they are 0, 0, 0, and... 0.
So it turns out that uio_disable_irq() and uio_enable_irq() do
exactly the same - send a 32-bit zero value to the kernel.
Is this the expected behavior indeed?
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@stor
fix this?
I haven't tested that, but my first attempt would be to add --no-start to
the invocation of dh_installsystemd in your rules file (you may need to
add an override_dh_installsystemd target to do that), and then your
postinst script would look something like that:
#DEBHELPER#
setup f
-dev sbin localization/locales
>
> Are any of these (like arping) literally duplicates of the same binary for
> some reason? Or are they true conflicts (different binaries with the same
> name)?
I don't know about many of the others (although I have my suspicions), but
the two pr
o
> >determine whether the user is in a restricted shell, and pkexec is
> >essentially a type of sudo and should be unavailable to anyone who is
> >using a restricted shell.
>
> Ah okay, makes sense…ish (sudo does not check this).
It does if one configures it to by settin
nd in this particular case, Lauren, I *will* get
around to taking a look at yours soon, honest!)
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E
w
been proven through testing that some of the dependent modules are
not really affected by the incompatible change. In my experience,
nowadays this happens much, much more rarely than 10 or 15 years ago.
I have no idea how long it will take the Rust ecosystem to realize
that. I know that some of the most widely used modules have already
done that, some of them have been at the same 0.x.* or even 1.*
version for years (yes, really, years). So... here's hoping.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
nd shipped in macOS
> containing embedded firmwares. See asahi-fwextract ITP: #1055206
>
> Regards,
> Andreas Henriksson
>
>
> [1]:
> https://salsa.debian.org/bananas-team/asahi-fwextract/-/blob/debian/unstable/debian/patches/0001-Use-versioned-library-name-for-liblzfs
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Pentchev
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Debian Python Team
, r...@debian.org
* Package name: check-build
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Contact: Peter Pentchev
* URL : https://gitlab.com/ppentchev/check-build
hich seems to be the only way it supports
multithreaded operation right now), this could be arranged - I just
never thought anybody wanted that until now.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roa
en, if there is a default shipped in /usr,
the service authentication attempts may suddenly start succeeding
when the PAM packages are upgraded on an existing system.
Yes, I know that the override/drop-in mechanism provides a way to
do that by creating a /dev/null override symlink, but the sysad
package, that the "Python library" part may be
important: the upstream authors of the other project may have
decided to use it, as a Python library, instead of fiddling with
child process management by themselves.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ight now.
So... yeah. Thanks for your work, I know you mean well and you are
trying to make the life of Debian developers better, but this
particular approach will likely fail on a non-trivial set of
Debian -dev packages.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p.
reating and testing patches for this transition.
> Marking removal is too much.
On the other hand, the bugs have been open for an year and a half now...
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roa
/snaps exactly for that reason. But nothing do with
> anything discussed here though, as far as I can tell?
If an ELF executable, compiled on Debian, records its interpreter as
/usr/lib/ld-linux.so.2, what happens when one tries to run it on
a non-usr-merged system? Even one wi
ay (consciously or not) learn to ignore it.
I think a one-time notification via a (Debian) NEWS entry would be
a better choice.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 05:01:07PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 06-04-2023 15:37, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > I feel like I cannot ask for an unblock from the release
> > managers since the sparc64 buildd started failing on this package
> > at some point i
On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 04:37:16PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The libzstd package in testing is currently missing a couple of
> build-time tests and a fix for a very rare data corruption bug.
> Both of these have been fixed in libstd-1.5.4+dfsg2-5 in unstable;
..
ully. Is it possible that
something is wrong with the sparc64 buildd? Could somebody with
an actual sparc64 box try to build libstd-1.5.4+dfsg2-5 and
let me know if it works for them?
Thanks in advance!
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.co
" pledge is hard enough, but doing it as
a good phishing campaign with a large chance of success makes
it a lot harder.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
dh_auto_test:
dh_auto_test -- check
(any arguments after the ones that the debhelper tools understand will be
passed right on through to the build tools that they execute)
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 03:26:47PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 01:55:02PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Peter Pentchev (2023-02-22 10:49:30)
> > > So I've seen this idea floating around in the past couple of years
> > > (and i
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 01:55:02PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Peter Pentchev (2023-02-22 10:49:30)
> > So I've seen this idea floating around in the past couple of years
> > (and in some places even earlier), but I started doing it for
> > the couple of pi
Thanks for reading this far, and keep up the great work!
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 09:51:50AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 at 10:21:31 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > I can't speak of many other systems, but at least with Perl's XS
> > (the standard way to write Perl modules parts of which are compiled C
d say that "record the C compiler flags at build time" is
pretty much standard practice for such interface providers.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Pentchev
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, team+pyt...@tracker.debian.org,
r...@debian.org
* Package name: python-parse-stages
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Contact: Peter Pentchev
* URL : https://gitlab.com
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Pentchev
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, team+pyt...@tracker.debian.org,
r...@debian.org
* Package name: python-test-stages
Version : 0.1.1
Upstream Contact: Peter Pentchev
* URL : https://gitlab.com
using those symbols.
JFTR (I'm pretty sure that both Scott and Russ know this),
https://sources.debian.org/ can help one figure out whether some other
Debian package uses them.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://p
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 02:11:00PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 09:11:40PM -0500, nick black wrote:
> > it's 2023 and imho time to stop supporting unshadowed passwords
> > from the installer.
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-te
s 2. i just don't think this belongs in the
> installer anymore.
I know what NIS/YP is, I know of a couple of places where it is
still in use, and, as Mark Haber said, the people running those
places know how to find and flip a switch.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringle
ot;ping is not setuid"
default, then mention that debconf setting in a comment in the file that
the package installs in the sysctl.d/ directory.
Other than that, I think making ping not setuid is a great idea.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p.
have autopkgtests that compile trivial programs for other
library packages, I don't know why I didn't add one (and now, it seems,
at least two) for libzstd when I adopted it. Thanks again for the idea!
Once again, thanks to everyone for the relevant critique and helpful
suggestions!
G
On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 02:00:31PM +0100, Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
> Il giorno lun 26 dic 2022 alle 08:37:51 +02:00:00, Peter Pentchev
> ha scritto:
> > In #1020403 there is a request to install the CMake build glue for
> > the zstd library in its -dev package. I think that this
On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 08:37:51AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In #1020403 there is a request to install the CMake build glue for
> the zstd library in its -dev package. I think that this is a good
> idea, and I have a pretty much ready-for-uploading set of changes
>
ry.
That's not a big hurdle; if people say that this is the way to go, then
this is what will be done.
Many thanks to all the people who keep working on all the tools and
toolchains that make this message make sense at all!
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.n
in this: (an older version of)
the unidic-mecab package is already in the Debian archive.
This is not about a new package, but a package update.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.a
g 5.?
Do you mean having packages with the same names, but different versions
(even if only Debian revisions) and totally different contents, and also
built from different source packages, in different sections of the same
suite in the archive?... I'm... I'm not sure this would work
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Pentchev
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, r...@ringlet.net
* Package name: remrun
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Peter Pentchev
* URL : https://gitlab.com/ppentchev/remrun/
* License : BSD-2-clause
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 05:11:07PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Am Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 07:40:26PM +0200 schrieb Peter Pentchev:
> > > there was a (private) request to upgrade libzstd to latest 1.5.2.
> > >
> > > I'd like to repeat that
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Pentchev
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org,
r...@debian.org
* Package name: python-cfg-diag
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Peter Pentchev
* URL : https://github.com/storpool
ill try
to do that in the next couple of days. Apologies for the months of
delay, and thanks a lot for all of your team's work!
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerp
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Pentchev
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, r...@debian.org
* Package name: tox-delay
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Peter Pentchev
* URL : https://devel.ringlet.net/devel/tox-delay/
* License : BSD-2
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Pentchev
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, r...@debian.org
* Package name: utf8-locale
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Peter Pentchev
* URL : https://gitlab.com/ppentchev/utf8-locale
* License : BSD-2
ND=gnome
after installing the libgtk3-perl package ought to work, and it seems to
work for me:
sudo env DEBIAN_FRONTEND=gnome dpkg-reconfigure locales
...brings up a GTK+ interface.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://peo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Pentchev
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, r...@debian.org,
team+pkg-...@tracker.debian.org
* Package name: deltarpm
Version : 3.6.3
Upstream Author : Michael Schroeder
* URL : https://github.com/rpm-software
ound my service and
started it.
So, it's not as bad as it looks at first :)
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
come outdated and it is okay to use a mirror for
the security repository; just thought I'd mention that.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
oks listed at https://www.debian.org/doc/
Hope that helps! If you have any further questions, feel free to ask!
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17
le who say "the decision that
one specific action did not mean that SCO owns the copyright still
does not necessarily mean that there are no other reasons for
SCO-name-of-the-month to own the copyright")...
Sorry... some people do say that I sometimes worry too much and throw
w
ian/master
pristine-tar checkout -s ../confget_2.3.4.orig.tar.xz.asc
../confget_2.3.4.orig.tar.xz
gpg --verify ../confget_2.3.4.orig.tar.xz{.asc,}
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:24:02AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:50:35PM +0200, Boian Bonev wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > While playing with glibc 2.33 (I made a couple of
ram uses it, you need to depend on that".
But, yeah, the libc6 symbols file actually declares a << dependency
relation, too, so there it is :)
Hope that helped!
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
of having a no-op service vs a target]
(looks up from taking notes for the long-long-long-overdue conversion of
stunnel4 to systemd, being held back mainly by myself not having a very
clear idea which of the options to choose)
Thanks *a lot* for this awesome concise yet complete explanati
> And the same applies when _OPTIONS is filtered instead of _PROFILES.
>
>
> Did I get that right?
Just as a data point: for some time now I've been checking both
variables with a single check :)
ifeq (,$(filter nodoc,${DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS} ${DEB_BUILD_PROFILES}))
...
endif
...does the job, with some possible overkill, but, hey, it works.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t;> it's ok(ish) if the stuff is outdated today, but in 6 month it really
> >> should be current.
> >> (and then after the release we can slack a bit again, though usually it's
> >> less effort to always package and upload the latest version.)
> >>
from
> ~" — Isn't it what \w produces?
Yes, and there are some distributions that use \W, not \w, in their
default prompt, and there are lots of people Out There(tm) who do not
even realize that \w is an option :)
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@debian.org p
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Pentchev
Control: block 912338 by -1
* Package name: libmodulemd
Version : 2.9.4
Upstream Author : Stephen Gallagher , Igor Gnatenko
* URL : https://github.com/fedora-modularity/libmodulemd
* License : Expat
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Pentchev
Control: block 912338 by -1
* Package name: zchunk
Version : 1.1.5
Upstream Author : Jonathan Dieter
* URL : https://github.com/zchunk/zchunk
* License : BSD-2-clause
Programming Lang: C
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Pentchev
Control: block 912338 by -1
* Package name: libdrpm
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : Matej Chalk
* URL : https://github.com/rpm-software-management/drpm
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: C
t; what do we gain by this?
We do not let services start exposing information that was just lying
there because something else - or someone else - created a /srv/ftp
directory for some other use?
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev roam@{ringlet.net,debian.org,FreeBSD.org} p...@storpoo
e, that's not two lines, but it is a sensible (at least for me)
compromise between flexibility (allow the downstream packagers to easily
modify the flags) and policy (add a couple of flags in 99% of the
builds, unless the downstream packager or the user doing a manual build
has explicitly specifi
g/remembering!
You were indeed quite right to close both.
Keep up the great work!
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev roam@{ringlet.net,debian.org,FreeBSD.org} p...@storpool.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
992b134b4c89c7b0da5d2f9e141d03ffe29ff76729c4a4975
> >
> > Please, rebuild your package against the correct file.
> >
> > Please try to fix it and re-upload. Thanks,
> >
> > -- mentors.debian.net
> > (The sha256sum in the .dsc file is correct, btw.)
--
Peter
t trivial to
> configure as part of Debian packaging.
tcpserver certainly does not, it implements the UCSPI protocol, which is
a good one in itself, but it is still a different one.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev roam@{ringlet.net,debian.org,FreeBSD.org} p...@storpool.com
PGP key:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 05:06:10PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 03:34:37PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> [snip]
> > Highlighting changes inside the line is a massive improvement.
> >
> > There's an implementation of this in "git" i
iff
[roam@straylight ~]$
You're welcome... and thanks for bringing diff-highlight to my attention so
that I could whip these up :) Now only to figure out how to get the colors
more similar to the ones that Vim uses (I use a ~/bin/vdiff script that
pipes stuff through `vim -c 'set ft=diff&
ne else wants to beat me to it, i
> > certainly wouldn't complain :)
>
> I'll probably look into it once I've gone over some of the immediate
> stuff I have on my plate, if there's been no patch submitted by then.
> :)
Here you go :)
https://gitlab.com/dkg/soc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Pentchev
* Package name: libperl-prereqscanner-notquitelite-perl
Version : 0.9904
Upstream Author : Kenichi Ishigaki
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Perl-PrereqScanner-NotQuiteLite
* License : Artistic or GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Pentchev
* Package name: libregexp-trie-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Dan Kogai
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Regexp-Trie
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Description
ns to use the debsnap(1) tool from the devscripts package.
(debsnap(1) was one of the tools that I only learned about because of
the "dpkg -L devscripts | grep bin/ | shuf -n10" question in
the NM templates; many thanks to whoever added this one - and this
goes for both the tool and
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 03:38:35PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 02:34:42PM +0100, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 14:07, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > > So these days I decided that DEP-14[1] actually seems to b
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 02:34:42PM +0100, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 14:07, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > So these days I decided that DEP-14[1] actually seems to be a Good
> > Thing(tm) and I started thinking about switching my packages' Gi
than "pkg/"?
Thanks to the people who came up with the idea of a harmonized layout of
Debian packaging repositories and then did the work of writing up
the DEP itself! And, yeah, well, does what I'm trying to do feel like
de-harmonizing the layout by introducing Yet Another Branch Namin
e maintainers of the stack will first package the dependencies, wait
for them to migrate to testing, then backport them, and then they will
upload the main piece of software first to unstable and then to the new
suite under discussion.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev roam@{ringlet.net,debi
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
