Re: how to tell people to dpkg-reconfigure exim4-_CONFIG_?

2006-10-09 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:23:48 +0200, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >funny, i'd have said the ultimate solution was finding a way to make the > >users learn about looking at README.Debian :) That is, "they should be paying more attention t

Re: looking for the article with a graph of the relations between maintainer scripts

2006-10-02 Thread James R. Van Zandt
"Andrew Saunders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Can any one point me to the article with a graph of the relations > > of the various maintainer scripts? > > Sounds like you're after > http://women.debian.org/wiki/English/Main

Re: Problem including (linux-kernel-headers 2.6.17)

2006-09-30 Thread James R. Van Zandt
> I am trying to prepare packages for the new MaxDB release 7.5.00.38 and > am having problems with a new piece of code in there. > > The code in question looks like this and is known to work on Suse SLES9: ... > # include > are user-space applications not supposed to include any headers belo

Re: Bug#386911: ITP: Claroline -- Course Management System for Online Learning

2006-09-11 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Minor point: the package name should not contain any upper case letters :-) > 5.6.7. `Package' > > > The name of the binary package. > > Package names must consist only of lower case letters (`a-z'), digits > (`0-9'), plus (`+') and minus (`-') signs, and period

Bug#386034: ITP: astronomical-almanac -- astronomical almanac - calculate planet and star positions

2006-09-04 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "James R. Van Zandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This replaces the formerly proposed package "aa". Package name: astronomical-almanac Version : 5.6 Upstream Author : Steve Moshier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL

Bug#383940: ITP: aa -- astronomical almanac - calculate planet and star positions

2006-08-20 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "James R. Van Zandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: aa Version : 5.6 Upstream Author : Steve Moshier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.moshier.net/ * License : under discussion (probably G

Re: Bug#375410: ITP: epdfview -- Lightweight pdf viewer based on poppler libs

2006-06-25 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > epdfview is a pdf viewer based on poppler libs, like evince but without > all gnome libs dependencies, it only uses gtk libs. So I'd expect a smaller memory footprint and faster startup. What would I be losing? The ability to drag a PDF file a

Re: *-doc package should not gzip PDF file

2006-06-25 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If anyone wants this to be fixed following should happen. > > > > * Write a patch to the debhelper gzip text/pdf/ps file logic > >- do not compress if the package is *-doc and file extension is >

Re: Why does doc packages need to contain gzipped files?

2006-06-24 Thread James R. Van Zandt
> > > 2. xpdf doesn't want to open gzipped pdfs by default which > > > makes this a pain in the **tt for people who want to read the > > > pdf. > > > > There's "zxpdf" in the xpdf package, analogous to zless and zcat it > > views gzipped files. And some of us want to use evinc

Re: bits from the release team

2006-05-08 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Goswin von Brederlow: > > > Doesn't work if the key is ever compromised and a new one has to be > > created out of schedule. Or when you spend your x-mas holidays away > > from your system and couldn't upgrade before new years eve. > > Exac

Re: Adoption of the FHS

1999-05-25 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 12:53:51PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote: >> Can I upload packages with the /usr/info -> /usr/share/info modification? > >Yes you may :) GNU info has been set to read its files from that directory >since long time ago, IIRC before hamm.

Re: a question about scsi installs

1999-05-25 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Daryl Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >i would like to install debian on a dell poweredge 4300 with a PERC/2 >SC raid scsi controller from AMI. ... >there is a driver available from the manufacturer of >this card, however it does not appear to be on any debian >installation media or software

Re: Intent to package: reportbug

1999-05-15 Thread James R. Van Zandt
>* Version for virtual packages is the date of the report (/MM/DD) Any chance of making that an ISO-8601 format date instead? That is, -MM-DD. - Jim Van Zandt

Re: Debian coding style?

1999-05-09 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> Remember that the person who is most qualified to test any >>> piece of code is the person who wrote it. > >Wichert> I can argue about that. But I won't :) > >I can & I will. :) > >The person who wrote the code is almost always the *lea

Re: Installation Profiles

1999-01-31 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Jonathan P Tomer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >a possibility i considered: divide user-space...packages into >heirarchical groups (structure identical or similar to the debian >menus, possibly?). have a level wherein the user selects any of these >he wants; it will be easy to skip those things he

Re: Crypto software that *is* exportable from the USA

1999-01-25 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Paul Sheer wrote: >I remember someone was maintaining the debian release of this software >(although then, it did not support encryption). Please get the latest >version from: > ftp://lava.obsidian.co.za/pub/mirrordir/US/ I maintain the Debian package of mirrordir. The last version I packa

Re: Unsatisfied depends in slink main

1999-01-22 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Dale Sheetz writes: ... > >Package not in archives Package which depends on > Package not in archives > ... >tclx emacspeak >tclx74

Re: Volunteer(s) wanted to help with owner@bugs.debian.org

1998-06-14 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Steve Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >"James R. Van Zandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I'd sure like a mechanism, with either email or a browser, to get a >> list of the bugs registered against a particular package. > >Wha

Re: Volunteer(s) wanted to help with owner@bugs.debian.org

1998-06-13 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Where should I start? I'd sure like a mechanism, with either email or a browser, to get a list of the bugs registered against a particular package. It would help cut down duplicate bug reports. Now, I'm forced to download a list of *all* the bugs.

SATAN package?

1998-06-07 Thread James R. Van Zandt
I just finished reading the article on SATAN in the August '97 Linux Journal. SATAN can find weaknesses in the network configuration. I realize it can be a bad thing or a good thing, depending on the user's intent. I joined Debian after SATAN came out. Was there some decision made at that time

Re: hamm

1998-05-09 Thread James R. Van Zandt
>On Wed, 6 May 1998, James R. Van Zandt wrote: >> >..since >> >I saw this thread I couldn't resist to ask: what's the recommended way >> >(program) to keep an updated unstable distribution for a home user? >> >> I don't know of any easy wa

Re: hamm

1998-05-08 Thread James R. Van Zandt
>> I maintain a hamm mirror at work. According to my records, the >> traffic to keep hamm up to date amounts to about 20 MB/day. >I'm a bit of a newbie with respect to Debian, and I've recently susbcribed >to some mailing lists. I'm still reading a lot of FAQ material, but since >I saw this thre

Re: hamm

1998-05-06 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> Trying to upgrade via FTP to hamm would be too painfull at 28.8KB! > >Hi, > It depends on your pain threshold, I guess. I thought that too, >until I started the bo testihng program a little over a year ago. >Since then I

Re: Install process

1998-04-19 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Gregory S. Stark wrote: > It might even be possible to pass a parameter from loadlin with the > dos path the kernel was loaded from; the user could mount the msdos > filesystem and the install program could read the base disks (or a > single image) straight from the original dos partition. I was

intent to package flip

1998-04-18 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Here are the author's description and copyright. I have questions about each. > This program converts text file between MS-DOS and **IX format. It > works under System V, 4.3BSD, Ultrix, and MS-DOS/Turbo C. It detects > binary files in a nearly foolproof way and leaves them alone unless you > o

Re: vim, help files and vimrc

1998-04-12 Thread James R. Van Zandt
David Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >The debian conffile system has a weakness: there's no simple way to >announce what the significance of a changed conffile at administrator >decision time. I was thinking the other day that when dpkg discovers a conffile has been changed, it should displa

Re: package pre-selections tool

1998-04-10 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Enrique - I would like to update my package profiles. I have settled on just two. Here are their statistics: basic 33113 KB main=76 contrib=0 non-free=0 standard 122680 KB main=137 contrib=0 non-free=0 Here are my suggested description lines: "basic" standalone system witho

Re: package pre-selections tool

1998-04-09 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Here are three package selections to start things off. They are based on the package priorities: The first includes only "base", the second adds "important", and the third adds "standard". The only real oddity is that gcc and cpp are among "base". Is this only because dpkg needs it, to get the

Re: package pre-selections tool

1998-04-09 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Yann - >James R. Van Zandt writes: > > ( ) minimal 40 MB > > ( ) router/firewall 70 MB > > ( ) server (ftp, nfs, smb, and http servers) 90 M

Re: base-files 1.6 (source all) uploaded to master

1998-04-08 Thread James R. Van Zandt
>However, I'm willing to set default root's prompt in base-files to >'\h:\w\$ ' if enough people prefer it to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:\w\$ '. I would prefer '\h:\w\$ ' - Jim Van Zandt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Re: What's Debian's /usr/src policy

1998-01-10 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Ian Jackson writes: >I think that /usr/src should the be domain of the local admin. I agree. My policy is: If the binaries are in /usr/local/bin, then the sources go into usr/local/src. If the binaries are in /bin or /usr/bin, then the sources go into /usr/src. - Jim V

Re: Device files

1998-01-02 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Martin - >I'm packaging a kernel driver for the Gravis Ultrasound sound card. >It requires some special device files to be created (in addition to >those normally used by the OSS driver) in order for all of its >features to work. My question is, how should I create the device >files? The same is

Re: RfD: Debian is not randomly installing services

1997-06-29 Thread James R. Van Zandt
David Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Let dpkg/diety do something like this: >0. The question was already answered during an old install (and stored > via dtxtdb or something better) -> take that answer ... If this feature is implemented, it should be governed by a meta-question. An experienc

Re: Documentation Policy

1997-06-22 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> proposes: > > The documentation will be distributed via several packages: > > foo-doc-html for HTML docs > foo-doc-info for GNU info docs (where available) > foo-doc-xxx for other formats (only where appropria

"bazaar" model for Debian software development

1997-06-21 Thread James R. Van Zandt
John W. Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (the maintainer of Octave) has pointed out a very interesting document by Eric S. Raymond: http://www.ccil.org/~esr/writings/cathedral.html It discusses two models for software development. One is the standard method of "test thoroughly, and release inf

bug server feature request: "index-summary foopackage"

1997-06-15 Thread James R. Van Zandt
Milan Zamazal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >One problem with reporting bugs I feel personally is what to do to >avoid repeating reports. I use the following algorithm, when I >discover a bug: >1. I go through the list of pending bugs posted to bug list > periodically, and check whether it could

Re: deleting binary soft link on ftp sites

1997-06-05 Thread James R. Van Zandt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > In anticipation of Debian being released (publically)for platforms > other than ix86 it would be a good idea to phase out the use of > the binary -> binary-i386 link on the ftp sites as this could > cause confusion. Is there anything that actually uses this link? I do