On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:53:41AM +0100, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> > Also ive offered my resignation in the past.
> > I do still offer to resign from the FFmpeg leader position, if it
> > resolves this split between FFmpeg and Libav and make everyone work
> > together again. I never understood why pe
Quoting Josselin Mouette (j...@debian.org):
> I’d like the thread to be useful, and for that goal it would be much
> appreciated if the d-i team could you tell us what the relevant criteria
> are and what people need to work on.
Here is my opinion. Please take it as "opinion of someone who's been
On 07/08/14 23:10, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> Popularity: One of the metrics discussed by the tasksel change proponents
> mentioned popcon numbers. 8 months after the desktop change, Xfce does not
> seem
> to have made a dent on install numbers. The Debian GNOME team doesnât feel
> popconâs data
>
>
> I’d like the thread to be useful, and for that goal it would be much
> appreciated if the d-i team could you tell us what the relevant criteria
> are and what people need to work on.
>
> → Is the installation CD size still relevant?
> → What is the target audience of Debian-installer for the
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 06:34:46PM -0400, Hashem Nasarat wrote:
>
> The following "first party" extensions are developed along with
> gnome-shell and are updated for each gnome-shell release.
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-shell-extensions/tree/extensions
>
> Extensions on https://extension
On 13/08/14 23:08, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> the common reaction I get from new Linux users [...]
> I would also recommend to go for
> this user group when selecting a default, since any more experienced
> user can absolutely be expected to pick the right image with their
> favourite flavour of Debi
Le mardi 12 août 2014 à 12:26 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
> Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Do you intend to review (or are you reviewing) the decision taken in
> > July 2012 [1] ? If so, is this discussion here on -devel useful ? If
> > it is useful, what questions should we be focusing on ?
>
> See my
On 08/13/2014 06:08 PM, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> 2014-08-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Theodore Ts'o :
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:18:49PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
>>> Well, Linus' extensions won't break because GNOME updates them with
>>> every release and ships them with the official GNOME release.
2014-08-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Theodore Ts'o :
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:18:49PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
>> Well, Linus' extensions won't break because GNOME updates them with
>> every release and ships them with the official GNOME release.
>
> From the README found in "gnome-shell-extensions"
Am 07.08.2014 12:32, schrieb Anton Zinoviev:
> I have two bugs reported against console-setup about keybord not working
> properly under X Window. In both cases I have asked the reportes to
> provide the file /etc/default/keyboard and in both cases the file was
> correct. Therefore, the bugs
On 2014-08-13 14:34, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, Colin Watson wrote:
I don't think there's a good reason to build them separately, and some
good reasons not to (for example, it would waste a good deal of buildd
time for a number of packages without very hygienic separation of
th
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:18:49PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> Well, Linus' extensions won't break because GNOME updates them with
> every release and ships them with the official GNOME release.
>From the README found in "gnome-shell-extensions" sources:
GNOME Shell Extensions is a collec
2014-08-13 22:05 GMT+02:00 Anthony F McInerney :
>> But I'm actually back to gnome3 because with the right
>> extensions it is more pleasant."
>
> So the question is does debian have the extensions he speaks of?
> (and) Have debian tweaked those extensions by default, to his liking?
>
> And to quo
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 12:24:49 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Guillem Jover wrote:
> > # Full build, but filter the generated .changes file to only inlcude
> > # source and possibly arch-indep binaries, will not fail if the
> > # latter are missing.
> > $ dpkg-buildpackage --changes-option=-
>
> But I'm actually back to gnome3 because with the right
> extensions it is more pleasant."
>
So the question is does debian have the extensions he speaks of?
(and) Have debian tweaked those extensions by default, to his liking?
And to quote a not so famous computer user who said "what's that c
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Antonio Terceiro
* Package name: ruby-exception-notification
Version : 4.0.1
Upstream Author : Jamis Buck
* URL : https://github.com/smartinez87/exception_notification
* License : MIT (Expat)
Programming Lang: Ruby
De
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 04:09:25PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> To quote a fairly famous Linux user who eventually came back from XFCE
> to GNOME: "But I'm actually back to gnome3 because with the right
> extensions it is more pleasant."[1]
>
> But I'm not sure if he qualifies as a power user
Guillem Jover wrote:
> # Full build, but filter the generated .changes file to only inlcude
> # source and possibly arch-indep binaries, will not fail if the
> # latter are missing.
> $ dpkg-buildpackage --changes-option=-g
>
> The advantage of the second is that the package is fully built
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-xstatic-hogan
Version : 2.0.0.2
Upstream Author : Radomir Dopieralski
* URL : https://github.com/stackforge/xstatic-hogan
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python, JS
Desc
It has now appeared in the repos! Thanks everyone.
https://packages.qa.debian.org/libb/libbitcoin.html
On 13/08/14 09:20, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> Quoting Amir Taaki (gen...@riseup.net):
>>
>>> However, I think maybe this might have slipped through the cracks and
>>> has been missed. Any informa
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:30:05 +0200
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> I never understood why people who once where friends
> became mutually so hostile
You should know that better than anyone else!
You still claim to be my friend, yet you said and did things
that i have not seen from my enemies, let
Hi,
On 08/13/2014 15:43, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Is it the power user? Is it developers? Is it the typical users I've
> seen on Launchpad, such that I've largely stopped dealing with bug
> reports there --- far too many Ubuntu users can't file a proper bug
> report, and then other Ubuntu users Go
Hi,
Theodore Ts'o writes:
> This is actually the core (hidden) question which I think is driving
> the whole debate. Ignoring the claims of Debian as the "universal
> operating system", what audience does Debian what to target by default
> in its installer?
Agreed. Though "default" is a very im
Hello there,
Basically I’m emailing today to see if you offer any advertising options on
your site. I’m working with a Web Hosting company and I think advertising
or a sponsored post on your site would be really beneficial to them.
I have thought of a few ideas if you do offer sponsored post opti
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 05:17:10PM -0700, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
>
> That's why I see GNOME 3 as a tablet environment. I'd love to use a
> tablet with GNOME 3. But using it in a desktop just reduces the
> communication between me and my computer. What is Debian?
This is actually the core (hidden)
Tach Joël,
Am 13.08.2014 05:42, schrieb Joël Krähemann:
> Hi I develop an audio sequencer:
> http://ags.sf.net
>
> Now, what values would you recommend as JIFFIEs for the following
> threads:
>
> * AgsAudioLoop
> * AgsTaskThread
> * AgsGuiThread
> * AgsDevoutThread
the topic of the debian-devel
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> First, w-b has to recognize that arch:all packages need to be built.
> And they need to be scheduled on a buildd which builds the arch:all
> packages (and only the arch:all packages?).
>
> For the latter I assume sbuild would need an option to bu
Hi!
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 02:35:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> #756975 dpkg-dev: dpkg-genchanges option to only include arch:all debs
This is now available in dpkg 1.17.11, and as mentioned on the bug
report, you can use it in at least these ways:
# Source and arch-indep only build, will fail if
Hi!
[ I had a note to reply to the previous thread, but never got to it. ]
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 13:27:38 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> On 08/12/2014 12:33, Hector Oron wrote:
> > 2014-08-01 9:37 GMT+02:00 Ansgar Burchardt :
> >> We will allow not including arch:all packages in uploads once we
On 2014-08-12, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
>
>
> On 09/08/14 04:30, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Quoting envite (2014-08-09 10:43:25)
>>> XFCE (does not mount my USB disks)
>>
>> Did you perhaps suppress recommends?
>
> Should this really be a Recommends?
It surely fits the definition of Recommends.
|
Hello Charles
> Peer review can help, by making sure that the final controllers (the FTP
> Master
> team) do not waste their time reporting defects that others could have found.
> You can find a process for peer review at the URL below.
>https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReview
I like a lot
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, Brian May wrote:
> * Package name: cryptography
...
> I imagine the binary package will be called python{,3}-cryptography.
> Haven't got to this step yet.
Wouldn't it be better to also have the source package name in the python-
namespace? Its using a dictionary word for
Thank you.
On 13/08/14 09:20, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> Quoting Amir Taaki (gen...@riseup.net):
>>
>>> However, I think maybe this might have slipped through the cracks and
>>> has been missed. Any information would be much appreciated.
>>> The responsible team (Debian Bitcoin Team) seems to be dea
Hi!
Thanks for the response. I've had review on my license by the SFLC and
the FSF. See their responses here:
https://wiki.unsystem.net/en/index.php/Libbitcoin/License
Also I have emails from the Debian mailing list on this issue which I
can contribute. Is there anything I need to do to pass tha
> Quoting Amir Taaki (gen...@riseup.net):
>
> > However, I think maybe this might have slipped through the cracks and
> > has been missed. Any information would be much appreciated.
> > The responsible team (Debian Bitcoin Team) seems to be dead judging from
> > their mailing list.
Le Wed, Aug 13
On 08/11/2014 07:49 AM, Cameron Norman wrote:
> El dom, 10 de ago 2014 a las 11:39 , Kees de Jong
> escribió:
>> Why are we discussing CD/DVD sizes? Why not just use an USB
>> netinstall? It's then possible to download and install the stuff you
>> need, if you don't want to use a lot of bandwidth
36 matches
Mail list logo
