> > > I’d like the thread to be useful, and for that goal it would be much > appreciated if the d-i team could you tell us what the relevant criteria > are and what people need to work on. > > → Is the installation CD size still relevant? > → What is the target audience of Debian-installer for the default image? > → What is the required level of accessibility? > → Will you configure different defaults for different architectures? >
I concur with this message, i also ask that whatever DE is chosen that they are open to change of default packages, default settings and default recommends. So that the debian default is a reflection not of that DE but of debian actually doing something proactive with it. I'd also like to note that HiDPI appears (as per my message which was not commented on) appears to be completely irrelevant as no current solution in debian appears to support it fully. On 14 August 2014 00:32, Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> wrote: >but they can at least be good for people who >don't know which they prefer, because those people are reliant on the >default. Which i believe concurs with my statement above.
