On Wednesday 24 October 2007 05:42:57 pm Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11182 March 1977, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> >> Thoughts? Flames? Let me have it! :)
> >
> > Let's just switch to postfix, exim is way too much complex for most
> > applications.
>
> No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should,
Am Donnerstag 25 Oktober 2007 schrieb Vincent Danjean:
> racoon seems to be a replacement for a cisco system (server, NOT client)
>
> I cannot modify the server infrastructure at my work (this can change:
> I'm not the only one annoyed by the cisco client). So racoon does not
> seem to fit as a dro
Package: wnpp
Owner: Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sunflow
Version : 0.07.2
Upstream Author : Christopher Kulla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://sunflow.sourceforge.net/
* License : MIT/X + BSD
Description : rende
Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Bastian Blank [Wed, Oct 24 2007, 11:36:27PM]:
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:55:12PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> 107 cisco-vpnc3
> 143 cisco-vpnclient 1
(free replacement exists)
>>> Which one ? vpnc does
Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Vincent Danjean [Wed, Oct 24 2007, 08:55:12PM]:
>> Faidon Liambotis wrote:
107 cisco-vpnc3
143 cisco-vpnclient 1
>>> (free replacement exists)
>> Which one ? vpnc does not handle connection based on certificate.
Thanks anyway. You are welcome to do what you wish with my firefox bugs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Stefano!
I think Manoj already gave a good reason about supporting personal
repositories on Alioth [1].
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:50:39 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Seriously, I don't see the need to prescribe the structure of
> personal repositories ...
If the personal repository stores t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I dutifully re-checked each bug.
1. I did't see comments for each of your bugs saying "it's still
relevant for version X of iceweasl".
2. The comments you did mail were doing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Meaning neither the maintainer nor I were aware of your response. I had
to
Hi Raphael!
Please don't Cc: me, I read the list.
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:55:36 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Luca Capello wrote:
>> soon after darcs.d.o became a reality [1], Zack asked me about
>> including the support for it in debcheckout and I did it as bug
>> #445714 [
#include
* Vincent Danjean [Wed, Oct 24 2007, 08:55:12PM]:
> Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> >> 107 cisco-vpnc3
> >> 143 cisco-vpnclient 1
> > (free replacement exists)
>
> Which one ? vpnc does not handle connection based on certificate.
It does (less or more
#include
* Bastian Blank [Wed, Oct 24 2007, 11:36:27PM]:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:55:12PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> > >> 107 cisco-vpnc3
> > >> 143 cisco-vpnclient 1
> > > (free replacement exists)
> > Which one ? vpnc does not handle connection
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:55:12PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> >> 107 cisco-vpnc3
> >> 143 cisco-vpnclient 1
> > (free replacement exists)
> Which one ? vpnc does not handle connection based on certificate.
racoon.
Bastian
--
No one wants war.
Bastian Blank wrote:
>>> 14 zaptel 295
>> Not really considered for inclusion by upstream, yet.
>
> Not possible to merge in the current state.
I know, I'm comaintaining it :)
It may be a good candidate (along with mISDN/vISDN) for Greg KH's team,
however.
>>> 12 kvm
On (24/10/07 09:50), Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > 13 loop-aes305
>
> Deprecated by dm-crypt.
Not entirely true. However it is not going to go in to upstream, so the
effect is the same.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswe
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Nico Golde wrote:
> Oh ok thank you, that explains why it didn't work here even with
> deleting the config files, there is an MTA configured.
Uh... it asks you the questions even if there is an MTA configured.
Don Armstrong
--
Identical parts aren't.
-- Beach's Law
http:
Faidon Liambotis wrote:
>> 107 cisco-vpnc3
>> 143 cisco-vpnclient 1
> (free replacement exists)
Which one ? vpnc does not handle connection based on certificate.
If you know a free replacement of cisco-vpnclient that can handle
certificates, I would be ve
Hi Don,
* Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 20:42]:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Nico Golde wrote:
> > The question was if you get asked how to report bugs on install this
> > should have nothing to do with what the user has in his home
> > directory.
>
> Of course it should; reportbug needs
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Nico Golde wrote:
> The question was if you get asked how to report bugs on install this
> should have nothing to do with what the user has in his home
> directory.
Of course it should; reportbug needs to know who is sending the mail,
and the proper place to store that is in t
Hi Stephen,
* Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 20:35]:
> This one time, at band camp, Nico Golde said:
> > Hi Daniel,
> > * Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 20:25]:
> > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:00:20PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > > Just tried by doing an aptitude
This one time, at band camp, Nico Golde said:
> Hi Daniel,
> * Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 20:25]:
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:00:20PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > Just tried by doing an aptitude purge reportbug && aptitude
> > > install reportbug since I haven't install
Hi Daniel,
* Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 20:25]:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:00:20PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > Just tried by doing an aptitude purge reportbug && aptitude
> > install reportbug since I haven't installed a fresh system
> > for quite some time, but it didn'
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:00:20PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Just tried by doing an aptitude purge reportbug && aptitude
> install reportbug since I haven't installed a fresh system
> for quite some time, but it didn't ask at least on this
> system here.
I would imagine it's in $HOME/.reportbu
Hi Bernd,
* Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 19:49]:
> >> reportbug is able to talk smtp to bugs.d.o directly, reportbug-ng allows
> >> the user to select a MUA to edit and send the mail.
> >
> > Yes that's true however the default configuration should be
> > changed then.
>
> Doesn
>> reportbug is able to talk smtp to bugs.d.o directly, reportbug-ng allows
>> the user to select a MUA to edit and send the mail.
>
> Yes that's true however the default configuration should be
> changed then.
Doesn't reportbug just ask how to submit bugs while starting it the
first time? IMHO
On 24-Oct-07, 11:52 (CDT), martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.24.1742 +0200]:
> > No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should, (a move the exim
> > maintainer sure would love :), less bugreports), the only good option is
>
Hi Bernd,
* Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 19:04]:
> >> No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should, (a move the exim
> >> maintainer sure would love :), less bugreports), the only good option is
> >> to use a package that does not listen on any interface by default and
> >
Nico Golde schrieb:
> Hi Joerg,
> * Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 17:44]:
>> On 11182 March 1977, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>>
Thoughts? Flames? Let me have it! :)
>>> Let's just switch to postfix, exim is way too much complex for most
>>> applications.
>> No. if we ever switch away
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:22:32PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
[Fedora disallows non-upstreamed kernel modules]
Very interesting. I'd say we should atleast consider it due to various
points:
My concern is modules in the upstream kernel which have firmware
problems. While I am opposed to carryi
Hi,
>> No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should, (a move the exim
>> maintainer sure would love :), less bugreports), the only good option is
>> to use a package that does not listen on any interface by default and
>> just does local delivery.
> [...]
> Wouldn't this make it more di
* Joerg Jaspert [Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:42:57 +0200]:
> No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should, (a move the exim
> maintainer sure would love :), less bugreports), the only good option is
> to use a package that does not listen on any interface by default and
> just does local delivery
"Sune Vuorela" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2007-10-21, Ben Goodger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--=_Part_8909_32361462.1192962485303
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On 21/10/2007, Sune Vuo
also sprach Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.24.1742 +0200]:
> No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should, (a move the exim
> maintainer sure would love :), less bugreports), the only good option is
> to use a package that does not listen on any interface by default and
> just
Hi Joerg,
* Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 17:44]:
> On 11182 March 1977, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
> >> Thoughts? Flames? Let me have it! :)
> > Let's just switch to postfix, exim is way too much complex for most
> > applications.
>
> No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we sho
On 11182 March 1977, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> Thoughts? Flames? Let me have it! :)
> Let's just switch to postfix, exim is way too much complex for most
> applications.
No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should, (a move the exim
maintainer sure would love :), less bugreports), the only
Jim Paris escreveu:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Ehh... I meant something along the line of...
"Info for Debian VERSION users : if you see this warning there are
several solutions... blah blah".
For Debian, I don't think there are any complete solutions yet.
The related bug is
http://bugs.debian.org/c
On Oct 24, Soren Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thoughts? Flames? Let me have it! :)
Let's just switch to postfix, exim is way too much complex for most
applications.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Debian dudes!
In Ubuntu we've had a discussion about setting a default mta[1].
For purposes of consistency, I believe it would be a good idea if any
package that states a dependency on mail-transport-agent would also
state a (the same, of course) preferred package providing
mail-transport-agen
Here is a small status update on the dependency based init.d script
ordering effort.
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> As you might be aware, there are several bugs in the Debian boot
> sequence. The bugs affect some combinations of packages, and are some
> times hard to solve. To solve them once and for
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 11:32:26AM +1000, Paul Wise wrote:
> Interestingly, Fedora has a new policy that kernel module packages
> must be merged with kernel.org or removed from Fedora:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/KernelModules
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DavidWoodhouse/KmodPropos
In der sehr häufigen Hardwarekonfiguration erkennt SRM weder eine IDE
Festplatte noch über Adaptec 2940 UW SCSI angeschlossene Festplatten. Der
installer von CD funktioniert allerdings wunderbar und erkennt auch die
SCSI Karte und führt die Installation zu Ende. Start von Linux geht aber
>>> 34 thinkpad 54
>
> The acpi support?
No, the thinkpad modules provided a lot of useful functions for things
which are done by acpi now - but back at times when acpi was not useable
or didn't exist, they worked very well - and still do so for Thinkpads
which can't ha
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Luca Capello wrote:
> soon after darcs.d.o became a reality [1], Zack asked me about
> including the support for it in debcheckout and I did it as bug
> #445714 [2], arising some discrepancies in how the personal
> repositories are managed:
>
> - git.d.o uses $HOME/public
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:50:04PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> soon after darcs.d.o became a reality [1], Zack asked me about
> including the support for it in debcheckout and I did it as bug
> #445714 [2], arising some discrepancies in how the personal
> repositories are managed:
Sorry to side-s
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:44:03AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> > 25 ieee80211 109
> > 61 ieee80211softmac 14
Merged and deprecated by mac80211.
> > 14 zaptel 295
> Not really considered for inclusion by upstream, yet.
Not pos
44 matches
Mail list logo
