Bug#379196: ITP: beaglefs -- implements a filesystem representing a live Beagle query

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andrew Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: beaglefs Version : 1.0.3 Upstream Author : Robert Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/fuse/beaglefs/ * License : GPL Pro

Re: lilypond and python

Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > experimental has a python-defaults pointing to 2.4 When did this happen? Is there some reason you didn't reply to my status-requests with this information? Why are you trying to keep things secret from me? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI

Re: lilypond and python

Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> So, let me make plain: I am entirely happy to accept a workaround >> patch for lilypond's current upstream stable release that will make it >> build and use python 2.4 even when that is not installed as "

Re: lilypond and python

Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > well, there's curently only one person spreading lies and fud about > python packaging, so please don't talk about "lies" as well. I'm still > testing uprades and fixing upgrade issues. experimental has a > python-defaults pointing to 2.4, so you can pr

Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5

"Manoj Srivastava" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I see you have not fully followed through on reading policy here: ,[ § 7.2 ] | In case of circular dependencies, since installation or removal order | honoring the dependency order can't be established, dependency loops |

Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5

On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:25:16 -0400, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > "Manoj Srivastava" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:09:56 -0400, Joe Smith >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> >>> Well, strictly speaking all circular dependencies could

Re: Configuration file shadowed?

On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 21:54:50 +0200, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 21-Jul-06, 13:41 (CDT), Jean-Christophe Dubacq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> The way I see it, the /usr/share/texmf/mktex.cnf is a "default >>> value file", used in the s

Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5

"Manoj Srivastava" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:09:56 -0400, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Well, strictly speaking all circular dependencies could be considered a policy violation because they depend on dpkg not working as policy sta

[Ping] Packages-arch-specific: please add architectures to Ada packages

It has been a week since I sent the request below, and I received no answer. I am resending to the three maintainers of Packages-arch-specific, and CCing debian-devel. I've restricted the list of supported architectures to those where gnat-4.1 not only exists but also builds its shared libraries.

Re: Configuration file shadowed?

Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The difference here is that if you follow this path, ad > eschew the conffile mechanism, it is up to you to provide the benefit > to users that conffile mechanisms provide: namely, the user is > informde when the maintainer changes default

Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5

On Fri, Jul 21, 2006, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Well, strictly speaking all circular dependencies could be > > considered a policy violation because they depend on dpkg not > > working as policy states it does. > Could you elaborate on this? I think he meant that dpkg breaks the loop, a

Re: Bug#379089: Configuration file shadowed?

Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Re: Frank Küster 2006-07-21 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> I believe that we need to rephrase the TeX Policy. But this requires >> not just to specifiy that each "cfg" file must be in /etc. Instead, I >> think we need to find a distinction between >> >> - fil

Re: Configuration file shadowed?

Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 21-Jul-06, 13:41 (CDT), Jean-Christophe Dubacq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The way I see it, the /usr/share/texmf/mktex.cnf is a "default value >> file", used in the setup of the whole texmf hierarchy; the >> configuration is /etc/texmf/mktex.

Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5

On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:09:56 -0400, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Well, strictly speaking all circular dependencies could be > considered a policy violation because they depend on dpkg not > working as policy states it does. Could you elaborate on this? manoj -- Do inf

Re: Configuration file shadowed?

On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:41:38 +0200, Jean-Christophe Dubacq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Le 21 juil. 06 à 18:23, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : >> >> While it is true any file can be changed to change behaviour for >> TeX (like things can be changed in /usr/include/foo.h to change >> behaviour of a -

Re: Configuration file shadowed?

On 21-Jul-06, 13:41 (CDT), Jean-Christophe Dubacq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The way I see it, the /usr/share/texmf/mktex.cnf is a "default value > file", used in the setup of the whole texmf hierarchy; the > configuration is /etc/texmf/mktex.cnf, which, per web2c magic, > overrides the de

Re: Bug#379089: Configuration file shadowed?

Re: Frank Küster 2006-07-21 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I believe that we need to rephrase the TeX Policy. But this requires > not just to specifiy that each "cfg" file must be in /etc. Instead, I > think we need to find a distinction between > > - files that can be used to modify the behavior of prog

Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5

"Ian Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Allombert writes ("Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5"): Here the list of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by maintainers. Didn't we already have the conversation where we explained t

Re: Bug#379089: Configuration file shadowed?

Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > severity 379089 serious > thanks > > While it is true any file can be changed to change behaviour > for TeX (like things can be changed in /usr/include/foo.h to change > behaviour of a -dev package), any file with a name *.cnf is meant to >

Re: Configuration file shadowed?

Le 21 juil. 06 à 18:23, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : While it is true any file can be changed to change behaviour for TeX (like things can be changed in /usr/include/foo.h to change behaviour of a -dev package), any file with a name *.cnf is meant to be a configuration file, and must,

Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5

Bill Allombert writes ("Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5"): > Here the list of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by > maintainers. Didn't we already have the conversation where we explained that there is nothing necessarily wrong with a circular dependency ? Ian. -

Re: Configuration file shadowed?

severity 379089 serious thanks Hi, On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:57:20 +0200, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Because of this paragraph from the TeX Policy Draft: , 4.1 Configuration files | In a TeX system, in principle every TeX input file can be changed to | change the behavior of th

Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5

Dear Debian developers, Here the list of packages involved in circular dependencies listed by maintainers. This list is also available at (update daily, courtesy of Robert Lemmen). A list of dependencies including dependency graphs is avail

Bug#379126: ITP: ccontrol -- Compilation controller

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ted Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: ccontrol Version : 0.9.1 Upstream Authors: Rusty Russell : Michael Ellerman : M

Re: orphaning gitweb

Hi Andres, > I'm going to orphan gitweb; I haven't used it in a long time, and I've > been doing a poor job of keeping it up-to-date. It doesn't have any > bugs open on it; it just needs the occasional update (and the one patch > I've done for it should be fed upstream if they're willing to take

Re: lilypond and python

On Tue, Jul 18, 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > So, let me make plain: I am entirely happy to accept a workaround > patch for lilypond's current upstream stable release that will make it > build and use python 2.4 even when that is not installed as "python". > If such a functional patch appears

Bug#379104: ITP: complearn-mpi -- parallel quartet tree search system for clusters / supercomputers using MPI

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Rudi Cilibrasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: complearn-mpi Version : 0.9.3 Upstream Author : Rudi Cilibrasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://complearn.org/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: C Description :

Bug#379103: ITP: complearn-gui -- 3D drag-and-drop interface to CompLearn universal data mining system

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Rudi Cilibrasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: complearn-gui Version : 0.9.3 Upstream Author : Rudi Cilibrasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://complearn.org/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: C Description :

Re: orphaning gitweb

Selon Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Le ven 21 juillet 2006 04:09, Andres Salomon a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I'm going to orphan gitweb; I haven't used it in a long time, and > > I've been doing a poor job of keeping it up-to-date. It doesn't have > > any bugs open on it; it just needs th

Re: someone using apmd on ppc please test patch for #222635

Hi Aníbal! * Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060721 01:42]: > Someone using apmd on ppc please test patch for #222635 [0]. Works. I could reproduce the bug with 3.2.2-6, I couldn't reproduce it any longer with a patched 3.2.2-7: = [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/apmd-3.2.2$ apm -m On-l

RE: Package Selection for Debian Live

Thx, I know how to build a live CD or a pendrive with what I want on it (almost), and I know some tweaks to squash down all things (I comme from embedded developpment and even if it's far away now, this is always a concern for me). I was just thinking about your discussion on what kind of LiveCD de

Demande de renseignement

Bonjour,   je suis Monsieur KONAN ELVIS  Directeur  de CONTACT TRANS Distribution basée en Abidjan - Cote d'Ivoire.Je viens par ce message prendre contact avec vous dans le but d'effectuer une commande au sein de votre établissement, suite aux différents achats faits à Dubaï et Bankok qui n'o

Re: orphaning gitweb

(sorry for CC:ing you Pierre) Selon Thomas Girard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > According to [1], it has moved to git.git repo. It was distributed along with git from release 1.4.0 on, see: http://lwn.net/Articles/187062/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe

Re: orphaning gitweb

Selon Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm interested, but like said on IRC, I've not been able to find the > upstream: copyright file mention a password-locked FTP, and > git://kernel.org/./gitweb.git is now empty According to [1], it has moved to git.git repo. Indeed there's a gitweb

Re: orphaning gitweb

Le ven 21 juillet 2006 04:09, Andres Salomon a écrit : > Hi, > > I'm going to orphan gitweb; I haven't used it in a long time, and > I've been doing a poor job of keeping it up-to-date. It doesn't have > any bugs open on it; it just needs the occasional update (and the one > patch I've done for it

Bug#379087: ITP: libcomplearn -- data-compression based intelligence lib in C for machine learning researchers

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Rudi Cilibrasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libcomplearn Version : 0.9.3 Upstream Author : Rudi Cilibrasi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://complearn.org/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: C Description :

[MailServer Notification]Security Notification

WORM_NETSKY.DAM has been detected,and Replace has been taken on 21/07/2006 9.36.56. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Configuration file shadowed?

Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What does this imply? Why are configuration files (I am > assuming that something called mktex.cnf is actually a configuration > file) being installed in /usr/share/? I didn't notice that this was Cc'ed to -devel, and already answered to Ma

Re: Jubiläum Angebot.

"Izak Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/20/06, Barbara Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Streichen Sie mich unverzüglich aus Ihrer Liste! > > You can unsubscribe here: I bet she isn't subscribed, she just received spam that claimed to originate here... Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster S