On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:09:56 -0400, Joe Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Well, strictly speaking all circular dependencies could be
> considered a policy violation because they depend on dpkg not
> working as policy states it does.
Could you elaborate on this?
manoj
--
Do infants enjoy infancy as much as adults enjoy adultery? George
Carlin
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
