On Fri, Jul 21, 2006, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Well, strictly speaking all circular dependencies could be > > considered a policy violation because they depend on dpkg not > > working as policy states it does. > Could you elaborate on this?
I think he meant that dpkg breaks the loop, and installs packages despite their dependencies not being installed. -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
