On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 07:55:23PM -0700, Mashilamani Sambasivam wrote:
> Hello,
> I just want to get the opinion/comments of
> developers on some 10 slides I made, if you have time:
> 'Brief Analysis and Generalisation of Closed-Source
> Software Business Model to All Maximum-Profit Based
> Bu
Hello,
I just want to get the opinion/comments of
developers on some 10 slides I made, if you have time:
'Brief Analysis and Generalisation of Closed-Source
Software Business Model to All Maximum-Profit Based
Businesses '
the url:
http://logo3dforkids.sphosting.com/slide1.html
hope this is appr
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 12:38:41AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 06:45:26PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > But you remove the package from testing doesn't mean we won't have
> > users with it installed since it was present there so, IMHO, the
> > Confl
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 11:50:30AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Sorry, but I still don't understand it:
> >
> > You could continue to offer the complete archive as it is today, and it
> > shouldn't be a big amount of work to offer one or more
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 07:57:13PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10270 March 1977, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
>
> > 1. The ftpmaster was a member of pkg-php project, he boycotts my work and
> > don't offer something else.
>
> Im not a member of the php project and I would have rejected it too, I
In response to the Request For Package (RFP) #280209, [1]_ I've hacked
up a quick codeville package. The diff is attached. There are some
debian-legal matters concerning Open Source License v2.0 (and even
v2.1), so it'll probably end up in non-free (not that I agree with
these legal banterings at
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 09:10:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:52:02PM -0500, Adam M. wrote:
>
> > >Ideally, we would have agreement to update all of the following packages to
> > >libmysqlclient12 at the same time:
>
> > I would suggest that libmysqlclient14 should
Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Keep in mind that whenever you contribute something back to upstream,
> you generally get little recognition for it (at least in my experience).
> The code just becomes part of the new upstream version. I'm not too
> sensitive about the "recognition" part a
Hi Martin,
Thanks very much for the very thorough follow-up!
On 2 May 2005 at 16:23, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
| * Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-03 21:03]:
| > | Did you keep track which packages have been spoken for and for which
| > | you still need to file RFA or O reports?
|
Matthew Palmer wrote:
>I understood the proposal to be only for unchanged Debian source packages
>(ie pure rebuild). If an Ubuntuite is actively maintaining the package for
>Ubuntu, it stands to reason that they be listed as the Maintainer for the
>Ubuntu source package, with appropriate credit g
* Martin Schulze [Mon, 02 May 2005 20:46:44 +0200]:
> Maybe it's worth modifying the debian/control file a bit when you
> are altering the package such as
>Maintainer: becomes Debian-Maintainer
I like this. (In fact, I have a mail written proposing it. Glad I
postponed it and read the re
martin f krafft wrote:
>Apple has just released launchd, a init/cron/watchdog/etc.
>replacement. Has anyone looked at it? It seems like a bit of work to
>
>
It is not a good idea to replace multiple system utilities with one.
Right now I can install a different cron or inetd or atd, or I can
rem
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:34:09PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
>
>
>>Then I also found,
>>http://ubuntu.linux-server.org/mysql-query-browser/mysql-query-browser_1.1.4-1ubuntu2.dsc
>>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ gpg --verify mysql-query-browser_1.1.4-1ubuntu2.dsc
>>gpg: Signatur
Hi Martin!
You wrote:
> > | * the gsl set:
> >
> > -- is still mine though Bas Zoetekouw indicated that he would like to help.
> > I
> > think I got Chris Steigies to agree to help too.
>
> Looking at gsl itself, I can see neither of their names. Have they
> done any work and can they maybe d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 305753
Bug#305753: general: 38 packages still use "Origin: debian"
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> severity 305753 wishlist
Bug#305753: general: 38 packages still use "Origin: debian"
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> clone 305753 -1
Bug#30
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tomas Fasth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dbxml
Version : 2.0.9
Upstream Author : Sleepycat Software <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.sleepycat.com/download
* License : Sleepycat License, BSD compatible
Descr
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 12:25:28AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.03.0006 +0200]:
> > Another option would be to leave the source package maintainer the
> > same (to retain proper credit, etc.), but override the binary
> > package maintainer
also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.03.0006 +0200]:
> Another option would be to leave the source package maintainer the
> same (to retain proper credit, etc.), but override the binary
> package maintainer during the build (to reflect that it is
> a different build, and also dis
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 03:06:10PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> > Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > Every Debian derivative I have seen does this the same way. There is some
> > > inaccuracy in either case, but I think this is the le
* Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-03 21:03]:
> | Did you keep track which packages have been spoken for and for which
> | you still need to file RFA or O reports?
Let's make another round.
> | * the Octave complex
> -- is now in the hands on the pkg-octave-devel group with octave2.
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Every Debian derivative I have seen does this the same way. There is some
> > inaccuracy in either case, but I think this is the lesser of the evils:
> >
> > - Changing the maintainer field
> > - " is t
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Every Debian derivative I have seen does this the same way. There is some
> inaccuracy in either case, but I think this is the lesser of the evils:
>
> - Changing the maintainer field
> - " is taking credit for my work!"
> - Requires modification of every source packag
James Treacy wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:40:19AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > I have to confess this is mainly because I maintain both
> > packages.debian.org and packages.ubuntu.com and just copied the code.
> > If anyone has suggestions how to improve the wording on the Ubuntu
> >
Pascal Hakim wrote:
I've just created the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. You can
subscribe from http://lists.debian.org/debian-webapps/
And you can join the live discussions on #debian-webapps on irc.oftc.net :)
Let's have a nice collaborative work fellow developers!
--
Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I've just created the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. You can
subscribe from http://lists.debian.org/debian-webapps/
Cheers,
Pasc
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 13:50 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:21:30AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> > It really seems that such a list is need
I intend to orphan two of my packages: clara a GPLd OCR, designed for
large digitalizations of books - and vertex, a 3d OpenGL
modeller.
I do not use them anymore, and I've not been giving these packages the
attention they deserve for a while. I am sure someone else
will be able to do a much b
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 12:33:19PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> - you can build packages that aren't normaly autobuild (if the buildd
>> >> makes the debs available, encrypted witht the D
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:21:30AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> It really seems that such a list is needed, a lot of webapp maintainers
> would be happy to have a common place to talk about that.
Definitely.
> Here is the name that sounds to be the good one, according to this thread:
>
>
Sorry, forgot the upstream link. It's
http://lsec.cc.ac.cn/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/cct/cct/
--
Best Regards,
Carlos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 12:33:19PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> - you can build packages that aren't normaly autobuild (if the buildd
> >> makes the debs available, encrypted witht the DDs key or so)
> >
> > I don't see why that would be
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> - you can build packages that aren't normaly autobuild (if the buildd
>> makes the debs available, encrypted witht the DDs key or so)
>
> I don't see why that would be a _benefit_.
It comes down to: Because releases are so far apart.
Some Debian u
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Carlos Z.F. Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gbk2uni
Version : 0.22
Upstream Author : cxterm, Linbo Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Shujun LI <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : GPL
Desc
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 11:54:07AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Neil McGovern wrote:
> >As per the list creation guidelines, I'll suggest the following, unless
> >anyone can improve on it:
>
> Ok, thanks.
>
> I sent your report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and retitled the bug.
>
Thanks, saves me hav
Neil McGovern wrote:
As per the list creation guidelines, I'll suggest the following, unless
anyone can improve on it:
Ok, thanks.
I sent your report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and retitled the bug.
Cheers.
--
Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:21:30AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> >>>If interested people would think a l.d.o list
> >>>is better, that could also be nice.
> >>
> >>Once you've got me convinced the list is a good idea, it usually doesn't
> >>take too long to creat
On May 02, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not in Debian. Like all of Apple's "Open Source" stuff, this is released
> under APSL 2.0, which requires people who accept the license to give up all
> their patent rights.
There is no consensus that this is a DFSG violation, something which
also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.02.1031 +0200]:
> Not in Debian. Like all of Apple's "Open Source" stuff, this is
> released under APSL 2.0, which requires people who accept the
> license to give up all their patent rights.
>
>http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:14:43AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Apple has just released launchd, a init/cron/watchdog/etc.
> replacement. Has anyone looked at it? It seems like a bit of work to
> port it to Linux, but then it's also possibly a great tool which
> could revolutionise the sysv-rc s
Hello,
Lex Hider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> > On 10:26 Thu 28 Apr , Martin Mewes wrote:
> > > http://mbox.mewes.tv/ exists :-)
> >
> > Great! This is exactly the kind of thing I'm after. Probably the
> > month-by-month approach is most beneficial to me. I do think that
> > it's a pity that
Hi,
Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 12:45:17PM +0200, Martin Mewes wrote:
> > Pascal Hakim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> > > You might want to obscure those a little bit. You should probably
> > > munge the Return-Path from those emails, and possibly the top
> >
Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
If interested people would think a l.d.o list
is better, that could also be nice.
Once you've got me convinced the list is a good idea, it usually doesn't
take too long to create it.
It really seems that such a list is needed, a lot of webapp maintainers
would be h
Apple has just released launchd, a init/cron/watchdog/etc.
replacement. Has anyone looked at it? It seems like a bit of work to
port it to Linux, but then it's also possibly a great tool which
could revolutionise the sysv-rc stuff we have in Debian without us
having to write dependency-rc.
http://
> So, I'm not sure such kind of list
> will be useful for a long period. Of course, we could discuss about
> the meaning of 'long' in Debian metrics...
I disagree with that. A lot of people use webapps (through their
browser) a lot more than all the others.
I already explained my PoV about weba
su, 2005-05-01 kello 21:41 +0100, Neil McGovern kirjoitti:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I keep thinking that it should be in plural:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
also sprach GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.02.0610 +0200]:
> I agreed to Dickopp (you read the standard in detail). This is the
> implementation dependent behavior.
I never proposed to change the standard. I proposed to make use of
implementation-dependent freedom to implement timezon
45 matches
Mail list logo
