also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.03.0006 +0200]: > Another option would be to leave the source package maintainer the > same (to retain proper credit, etc.), but override the binary > package maintainer during the build (to reflect that it is > a different build, and also display a more appropriate name in > "apt-cache show" etc.). > > What do you think about this approach?
It would misappropriate any changes made by the Ubuntu maintainers
to the source package, no?
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
"everyone has a little secret he keeps,
i like the fires when the city sleeps."
-- mc 900 ft jesus
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
