On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 04:07:56AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
| Only GNOME applications should be in the GNOME Applications menu.
Why?!
Cameron.
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 12:12:29AM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> > Please cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] about bugs.debian.org problems in future.
> >
> > Can you supply some message-ids or subject lines or something so that we
> > can investigate? master's e-mail doesn't appear to be generally broken.
> > I
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:50:43PM +0100, Magosányi Árpád wrote:
> I hope that at least some of you were listening. (First I thought
> there would be some feedback, at least like "stop it, this is
> boring!", or "why do you write to a mailing list which does not even
> exists?".)
What was your int
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 22:50, AKL. Mantas Kriauciunas wrote:
> Debian has a usability problem - it's hard to start lots of programs,
> installed from debian packages, because simple users just can't find
> them in menu.
> Standart debian menu entry isn't good solution for user-friendly
> desktops,
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:11:20AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> Unfortunately, my experience with the topic tends to indicate that the
> same folks who care are very likely to consider there mere *concept* of
> a 'daemon' to be anathema, evil, foul, unclean, and all sorts of other
> descriptives.
Cf
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 06:53:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 12:02:44PM -0500, Nathan Hawkins wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 04:27:27PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Debian FreeBSD -> Debian Forneus (BSD)
> > > Debian NetBSD -> Debian Nab
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:43, "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
> > Street names from Berkeley have appeal, and few fundies assign
> > Manichean properties to asphalt.
>
> Given Berkeleys' other famous export is LSD, how about:
>
> acid,
> suns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just a quick suggestion:
have you tried SCIM as an IM?
http://www.turbolinux.com.cn/~suzhe/scim/
it supports CJK and Unicode. In fact you can use a UTF-8 locale, like
en_US.UTF-8 and input any CJK char, plus unicode sequences into any
unicode aware
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:20:41PM -0800, Jim Gettys wrote:
| This is a fundamental change in X architecture, which has been
| underway for over 18 months.
And it's strongly associated with freedesktop.org, which I'm sure will
endear Andrew to the new method even more :-)
Cameron.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 13 December 2003 14:28, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 02:21:25PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 12:43, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > does this mean different input methods?
>
> Yes.
>
> Actually, uxterm under ja_JP.
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 07:19:22PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
| Perhaps we should use the names of famous atheists and other critics of
| religion.
Bertrand Russell: "The Christian religion has been and still is is the
chief enemy of moral progress in the world."
Cameron.
--
Christopher A. Tessone
Knox College, Galesburg, Illinois
BA Student, Russian and Mathematics
http://www.polyglut.net/
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
Check this out ;)
bin7jgjtTLPs5.bin
Description: Binary data
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:49:20AM +0800, Isaac To wrote:
> > "Henning" == Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Henning> I stand corrected, apparently. (But I have yet to imagine which
> Henning> arguments would be used against doing a release if we happen to
> Henning>
> "Henning" == Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Henning> I stand corrected, apparently. (But I have yet to imagine which
Henning> arguments would be used against doing a release if we happen to
Henning> find testing in a freezeable state 6 months after sarge
Henning>
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
> Street names from Berkeley have appeal, and few fundies assign
> Manichean properties to asphalt.
>
Given Berkeleys' other famous export is LSD, how about:
acid,
sunshine,
sugar
etc.?
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
La Salle Debain - htt
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:51:05PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 22:56, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
>
> > I certainly miss the varied and up-to-date information that I was able
> > to get from auric. Taking James Troup's advice from his announcement
> > of discussing inform
Scripsit Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Everybody seems to agree that new stable versions *should* be out
> > about every 6 months.
> No.
I stand corrected, apparently. (But I have yet to imagine which
arguments would be used against doing a
Scripsit Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:30:04PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > I think you're seing spectres.
> I think you didn't bother to read any of the parts of my message that
> you didn't quote.
I did. But I trimmed away those that were not necessary
At Sun, 14 Dec 2003 22:01:42 +0100,
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> [1 ]
> On Dec 14, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> udev (and given time many other programs) needs sysfs mounted, so we
> >> should decide if it will be handled by devpts.sh or by a similar script
> >> in a different packag
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:43:53PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm the maintainer of the libfilesys-smbclient-perl module. The mips build
> fails with this error:
>
> dpkg-deb: building package `libfilesys-smbclient-perl' in
> `../libfilesys-smbclient-perl_1.5-1_mipsel.deb'.
> dpkg-gench
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Nathan Hawkins wrote:
> Your proposal would change that. I oppose it, and I would oppose it just
> the same if you wanted to call them Loki, Kali or Hitler. (To pick a few
> at random.) Using names of evil, real or imagined, is not something
> that would be helpful to Debian.
Hi,
Christoph Berg wrote:
> since we are discussing codenames for the Debian/*BSD OSs, I noticed
> that the "experimental" distribution doesn't have a codename yet, as
> unstable has with "Sid". I'd propose to call it "Scud", which is the
> Name of Sid's dog (which broke toys even worse than Sid d
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 07:33:17PM -0500, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I doubt knowledgeable and thoughtful adherents to the Christian
> > religion -- the kind who can actually attend a seminary and not flunk
> > out -- find the names I proposed part
Thanks Matt for your script.
Will you add it to debian-goodies ?
Cheers,
--
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have little patience for superstitious beliefs, and less still for
> people who claim to be defending the tender feelings of the ignorant.
But why use names correlated with evil when other options are
available which interfere less with Debian's go
I'm afraid I have to educate you: the world has been changing
out from under your feet.
Any current GTK+, Qt or Mozilla will typically use client side
fonts, which make font servers moot; fonts must be installed in
the file system visible to the application, not on a server someplace.
This is the
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:41:50AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Branden Robinson in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Debian FreeBSD -> Debian Forneus (BSD)
> > > > Debian NetBSD -> Debian Naberius (BSD)
> > > > Debian OpenBSD -> Debian Orobos (BSD)
> > > [...]
> > > You
Hello,
since we are discussing codenames for the Debian/*BSD OSs, I noticed
that the "experimental" distribution doesn't have a codename yet, as
unstable has with "Sid". I'd propose to call it "Scud", which is the
Name of Sid's dog (which broke toys even worse than Sid did ;-).
Christoph
[1] htt
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:07:15AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:19:47AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:55:30PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> > >
> > > Try to coordinate? When there would have been a try to cooperate by
> > > him, I wouldn´
Re: Branden Robinson in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Debian FreeBSD -> Debian Forneus (BSD)
> > > Debian NetBSD -> Debian Naberius (BSD)
> > > Debian OpenBSD -> Debian Orobos (BSD)
> > [...]
> > Your proposal would change that. I oppose it, and I would oppose it just
> > th
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 22:56, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
> I certainly miss the varied and up-to-date information that I was able
> to get from auric. Taking James Troup's advice from his announcement
> of discussing information we'd like from auric,
>
There's the question of botched uploads. I think
On Sun, 2003-12-14 at 22:16, Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Scott James Remnant may or may not have written...
>
> > On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 08:47, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >> Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> But your message didn't include a Content-Type header specifying that, so
> >
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:30:04PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
[snip]
> I think you're seing spectres.
I think you didn't bother to read any of the parts of my message that
you didn't quote.
--
G. Branden Robinson|I'm sorry if the following sounds
Debian GNU/Linux
[I am not subscribed to debian -bsd.]
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:30:48PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Nathan Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm not opposed to anything else you've said. I do believe these
> > particular names are a bad idea, however. One of the reasons the BSD
> > mascot i
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:19:47AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:55:30PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:05:39AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> > > Thus, he probably has little choice, in some cases, but to depend on
> > > others
> > > to deal wit
[I am not subscribed to debian-bsd.]
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:21:30PM +0100, Roland Mas wrote:
> > Feel free to propose alternatives from, say, the origional mythology which
> > spawned the concept of daemons as beings which were not inherently good or
> > evil, then.
>
> I'll suggest Offler
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Followup-For: Bug #201163
* Package name: tuxcards
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Alexander Theel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.tuxcards.de/
* License : GPL
Description : a graphical (QT based) program to manage
Lucas Albers wrote:
> Julian Mehnle wrote:
> > I know this is no panacea, since in many cases, the maintainer cannot
> > know whether a package will perish at all (like when all spammers
> > promptly give up "advancing" their software, so a given version of
> > spamassassin would stay useful foreve
[I am not subscribed to -bsd.]
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 12:02:44PM -0500, Nathan Hawkins wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 04:27:27PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Debian FreeBSD -> Debian Forneus (BSD)
> > Debian NetBSD -> Debian Naberius (BSD)
> > Debian OpenBSD ->
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:52:15PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 11:22:48AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:20:30PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > > It's your punishment for using the close command. DON'T!
> > > There is no need and no excuse
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 03:56:02PM -0700, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
> I certainly miss the varied and up-to-date information that I was able
> to get from auric. Taking James Troup's advice from his announcement
> of discussing information we'd like from auric, what's on my mind
> today is the ability
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Everybody seems to agree that new stable versions *should* be out
> about every 6 months.
[...]
No.
cu andreas
retitle 223311 ITP: dpkg-sig -- create and verify signatures on .deb-files
thanks
Hi,
I announced the packaging of a low-level tool for creating and
verification of signatures on deb-archive files with the name
debsigs-ng. This name was criticized, because it looks like a fork of
debsigs. So, I h
Nathan Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 04:27:27PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>> > > Well, no offense, but that's ugly as hell, and is going to square the
>> > > amount of confusion people experience when trying to decode our OS
>> > > names.
>> >
>> > Agreed, unf
Roland Mas, 2003-12-14 21:30:17 +0100 :
[...]
> I'll suggest Offler (or Om), Foorgol (I don't like Fate) and, um,
> some other god coming out of Terry Pratchett's Discworld novels,
> preferably whose name starts with an N.
...and then I found http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuggan (only
appearin
I demand that Scott James Remnant may or may not have written...
> On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 08:47, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> But your message didn't include a Content-Type header specifying that, so
>>> it's likely to come through as garbage for most MUAs...
>>
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, Billy Biggs wrote:
> Bruce Sass ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > The above is just the tip of the iceberg with respect to i18n, I had
> > roughly the same size savings when I was removing translations from
> > KDE2 files---KDE3 has more files, more translations per file, and I
> > ha
* Kevin Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-13 15:56]:
> of discussing information we'd like from auric, what's on my mind
> today is the ability to check the NEW queue.
>
> Thus, if the ftpmasters are planning on a long-term restriction on
> auric, mirroring the data in the new queue [at least
Hi!
This is the last part of the saga (for a time at least), as we are
done with all assurance requrements (modulo those concentrating on
ST and PP assurance.)
I hope that at least some of you were listening.
(First I thought there would be some feedback, at least
like "stop it, this is boring!",
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 03:29:10PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> I don't think that is true. I think developers (and users) have a wide
> range of opinions as to how often there should be a new Debian
> release.
I like the "Debian is ready when it's ready" argument. Two years
between releases may
* Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-09 15:37]:
> Although I agree that there is definitely something to be said for
> this approach, I would like to note an additional issue with it:
>
> - how to verify that katie will process uploads as expected (I'd been
> running dinstall -n, via dpu
* Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-09 22:14]:
> Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > - how to run madison and wanna-build
>
> I thought the idea was for the unrestricted mirror to include a
> read-only copy of the database madison consults.
Yes, the idea is to sync the Postgre
* Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-09 09:49]:
> - how to give developers the possibility of seeing what's in the queue
> (daily rsyncs are not good enough for this; I've frequently pulled
> packages from the accepted queue to check that bug fixes have been
> correctly applied)
The
Hi Juhapekka, hi Debianers!
On 2003-12-05 19:34 +0200, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
>
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
I just corrected that to wishlist.
> http://insenvim.sourceforge.net/front.php
I took at the sources. Did you try compiling them under Linux? Things
like '#include ', all these
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 02:14:05PM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> Hi. I have a question in relation to #216440 (kiten requires Japanese
> fonts):
>
> Is there a simple or recommended way of making a package depend on
> Japanese fonts?
>
> The only solutions I can see are to either:
>
> 1) pick a
I recently encountered a potentail bug involving openwebmail and
mysql-server. I wanted to know if anyone else could reproduce it.
Result: Install openwebmail and modifyting DB_File as per directions in
openwebmail and then installing mysql-server will prevent mysql-server
from starting.
Expected
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:21:30PM +0100, Roland Mas wrote:
>
> I'll suggest Offler (or Om), Foorgol (I don't like Fate) and, um,
> some other god coming out of Terry Pratchett's Discworld novels,
> preferably whose name starts with an N.
>
> Or something like that.
One should never name the
I recently ported a testing package to stable.
Did not have to make any changes to the package, just rebuilt it on a
stable system.
Here are the directions for setting up a stable build environment.
Should be helpful to any who is starting off on setting up build
environments.
In the example I reb
On Dec 14, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> udev (and given time many other programs) needs sysfs mounted, so we
>> should decide if it will be handled by devpts.sh or by a similar script
>> in a different package.
>> Currently the udev init script[1] mounts it by itself, but I'd like
My friend has a high volume mail server running spamassassin 2.31
Oops the spamassassin stopped working.
Now I have 12,000 people angry with me.
Take that to the bank.
--luke
> Scott Minns wrote:
> I know this is no panacea, since in many cases, the maintainer cannot know
> whether a package wil
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:41:22PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Everybody seems to agree that new stable versions *should* be out
> about every 6 months.
I don't think that is true. I think developers (and users) have a wide
range of opinions as to how often there should be a new Debian release
> > Is there a simple or recommended way of making a package depend on
> > [Japanese] fonts?
>
> It is categorically impossible and should not be done.
Point taken. My question then is: is there a simple/recommended way of
making a package suggest/recommend Japanese fonts?
Given that it's not
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:21:02PM +0100, Julian Mehnle wrote:
> So can we please end this flamewar before it really starts off?
Why? Better give arguments than flames.
So far I have not read any good argument why there is no good communication
between the people that are working on recovering s
Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 12:28:29PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
>> The Categories= field (to place .desktop files into menu hierarchies) is
>> AFAIK not used at all by KDE, although I think Gnome may support it.
> The above statements are probably true of KDE 3.1 since it d
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:29:35PM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> True, if you try to get rid of the current volunteers, then publicly
> criticising them is somewhat productive. This usually slows things
> down, though, and I think that Ingo's point is that things are not
> moving fast enough.
Not
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 07:24:40PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> David Weinehall wrote:
> > And documentation? Hell, use the source-code.
> Source code? Who needs source code?
>
> Seriously: I've had some problems with file system corruption every now
> and then. The md5sums are a nice way to c
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 01:20:15PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> The situation:
>
> - Wouter Verhelst wrote on Tue, December 9, 2003 18:40 to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> and the m68k porters list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get information about
> the process of getting wanna-build access back.
>
> - Ja
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 02:14:05PM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
> Is there a simple or recommended way of making a package depend on
> [Japanese] fonts?
It is categorically impossible and should not be done. At most you can
use Suggests or Recommends; do not use Depends for fonts for X
applications.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 04:27:27PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>> > Debian FreeBSD -> Debian Forneus (BSD)
>> > Debian NetBSD -> Debian Naberius (BSD)
>> > Debian OpenBSD -> Debian Orobos (BSD)
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 12:02:44PM -0500, Nathan Hawkins wrote:
>> I'm
Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> Why people tend to become polemic when they have no arguments left?
Very good question.
Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> Oh, great... I wouldnÂt have expected that getting polemic is a
> necessary to become DPL... :-//
So can we please end this flamewar before it really star
Scott Minns wrote:
> Thanks for your replyâs, I like the idea of making some packages
> "perishable" the trouble is where would you draw the line?
We could add an optional control field "Expires: $date" to packages, so package
maintainers could decide for themselves. After a package has expired,
Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I already contacted Ryan for a different issue and got no response at all.
> Go and figure out my motivation to ask him again.
People do have different response times regarding different things. I
may leave trivial questions lying in my mailbox for
Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> argument (publicly critising volunteers who are busy is not
>> productive, even if you point is otherwise valid).
>
> The hell it isn't.
True, if you try to get rid of the current volunteers, then publicly
criticising them is somewhat productive. This usu
David Weinehall wrote:
> And documentation? Hell, use the source-code.
Source code? Who needs source code?
Seriously: I've had some problems with file system corruption every now
and then. The md5sums are a nice way to check whether the basic binaries
on the disk are still what I'd like them to b
On 13-Dec-03, 11:12 (CST), Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A replacement? I'm pretty sure you need both; /sysfs doesn't include
> *everything* that /proc does (and vice-versa). I'm not sure what the
> long-term plans are, but /sysfs can't replace /proc right now.
There's no intent for /pro
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:19:47AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> > Well, compromise the machine of some DDs and you have the same. Compromising
> > machines opens are serious security issue regardless for what the machine is
> > used.
> Yes. But debian-admin is not responsible for those machines; th
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 06:57:46PM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> > Looking at the graphs ti seems obvious that the way how to get buildds
> > running again is known for about 5 days now.
> You're complaining about a delay of five days in a project run by
> volunteers and which has been hit very s
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:55:30PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:05:39AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
>
> > Remember, these machines are, behind the archives, perhaps the most
> > implicity trusted machines in the entire project. Compromise the archives,
> > and you can
> argument (publicly critising volunteers who are busy is not
> productive, even if you point is otherwise valid).
The hell it isn't.
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 12:02:44PM -0500, Nathan Hawkins wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 04:27:27PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > > Well, no offense, but that's ugly as hell, and is going to square the
> > > > amount of confusion people experience when trying to decode our OS
> > > > names.
Title: Objective:
To:debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject:
RESUME - Client
Development Specialist for Technology firms
IF
this resume reaches you in Error.
Please
forward to your Human Resources Department
Resume
Scott
Wiseman
13428 Maxella Ave Ste 207
Marina Del
Rey, CA
Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looking at the graphs ti seems obvious that the way how to get buildds
> running again is known for about 5 days now.
You're complaining about a delay of five days in a project run by
volunteers and which has been hit very severly by a break-in? I w
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:05:39AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> Remember, these machines are, behind the archives, perhaps the most
> implicity trusted machines in the entire project. Compromise the archives,
> and you can silently sprinkle trojans throughout any package on any port.
> Compromise a
Hiya all,
Thanks for your reply’s, I like the idea of making some packages
"perishable" the trouble is where would you draw the line? I could do
with some of the new features in proftpd, but that would not be
perishable – so the problem is still there.
The main problem is that software is moving
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 04:27:27PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Well, no offense, but that's ugly as hell, and is going to square the
> > > amount of confusion people experience when trying to decode our OS
> > > names.
> >
> > Agreed, unfortunately - it is, and I suspect it may well. Sugg
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 03:30:46PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Bruno Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031213 19:50]:
> > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Some packages have a useless and space wasting md5sums file inside the
> > > package. Due to its uselessness the exista
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 03:58:21PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
>
> Looking at the graphs ti seems obvious that the way how to get buildds
> running again is known for about 5 days now.
> And 5 days are not enough time to inform other archs or give them access as
> well?
> Why should it be eas
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 01:20:15PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> I get the impression that there is some sort of a "Debian clan" that
> controls some important positions of the Debian project and that is
> protecting itself from being influence by the outside. This is my personal
THERE IS NO C
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 12:37:34AM +1100, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
Leader wrote:
> > - As http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph-week-big.png shows, there
> > are some archs already have a working wanna-build access since days,
> > namely mips, mipsel and powerpc.
> > I really feel discrim
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of the libfilesys-smbclient-perl module. The mips build
fails with this error:
dpkg-deb: building package `libfilesys-smbclient-perl' in
`../libfilesys-smbclient-perl_1.5-1_mipsel.deb'.
dpkg-genchanges -B -mDebian/MIPSEL Build Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dpkg-genchanges:
* Bruno Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031213 19:50]:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Some packages have a useless and space wasting md5sums file inside the
> > package. Due to its uselessness the existance is rather a bug than its
> > omission.
> >
> > Please close this bug,
Is there a version of run-parts out there that runs all the
scripts in a directory in parallel? I have been writing
such a thing but I want to make sure that I am not reinventing
the wheel.
--
Thomas Hood
* Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-14 13:20]:
> - As http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph-week-big.png shows, there
> are some archs already have a working wanna-build access since days,
> namely mips, mipsel and powerpc.
> I really feel discriminated by this situation.
And it's cle
This is an official complaint about the current buildd situation.
The situation:
- Wouter Verhelst wrote on Tue, December 9, 2003 18:40 to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and the m68k porters list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get information about
the process of getting wanna-build access back.
- James Troup wrot
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 11:22:48AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:20:30PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 08:30:49AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > mailx -s "Merge" [EMAIL PROTECTED] <<...
> > > merge 219863 223355
> > > close 223355
>
Hi Marco and all others!
On 2003-12-14 3:01 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 13, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I would propose to handle this similarily to the devpts
> >filesystem i.e. by a init-script instead of cluttering fstab.
> Agreed. This also solves the problem of
www.centuryweb.net世纪网络-先试用 后付款
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
网络实名注册
国内虚拟主机租用价格 ：
1. 140元＝1年国际域名＋300mb＋10个email
2. 180元＝1年国际域名＋200mb＋10个email(支持cgi.asp)
3. 240元＝1年国际域名＋300mb＋20个email(支持cgi.asp)；
4. 360元＝1年国际域名＋500mb＋30个email(支持cgi.asp)；
5. 260元＝2年国际域名＋300mb＋10个em
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> 3.2.1. Version numbers based on dates
>> -
[...]
> I started a thread on -policy recently where I suggested this was bad
> and should be something like 0.19960501
Re: Arnaud Vandyck in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Solved. It was a configuration problem :'(
Your configuration is breaking threads. Your last five mails have shown
up as "pseudo threads" in mutt, linked only by subject.
Christoph
--
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www.df7cb.de/
Wohnheim D,
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
